Clarence Thomas Uses Immigration Case to Attack the Right to Birth Control
The Supreme Court justice seized the opportunity, on his 75th birthday, to remind everyone that he really hates the 1965 opinion in Griswold v. Connecticut.
JusticePolitics

One year ago this week, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, ending the federal right to abortion. Justice Clarence Thomas agreed with that decision, but wrote separately to say that the court should also overturn the cases legalizing marriage equality and guaranteeing the right to use birth control. The latter case, Griswold v. Connecticut, was decided back in 1965 and laid the right-to-privacy foundation on which Roe was built. Thomas called the opinion “demonstrably erroneous” in his Dobbs concurrence.
On Friday—his 75th birthday, incidentally—he reminded everyone again that he really, really hates that old birth control ruling; and this time he chose to do so in an immigration case.