In Which We Explore The Ridiculousness Of "Dressing For Your Shape"
LatestThere’s perhaps no fashion magazine feature as infuriating as “dressing for your shape,” as most designated shapes don’t really take a real woman’s body into consideration, but rely on dated and slightly offensive descriptions instead.
Take, for example, this Glamour feature from last year, which breaks women’s body types into these categories: Tall, Busty, Petite, Boyish, Plus-Size, and Pear-Shaped. Which is all well and good, I suppose, unless you happen to be a Pear-Shaped Busty Tall Woman looking for ideas on Plus-Size gowns, because the advice for each category is markedly different, which would lead many women to believe that there are only certain aspects of their bodies that are truly worth addressing, as opposed to concentrating on what fits and feels good.
Also, as someone who generally falls into the “oh, dear, puberty forgot to deliver your boobs” category, I think it would be nice if fashion magazines could stop referring to thin women without many curves as “boyish.” Femininity comes in many shapes and sizes, thanks, and Glamour’s advice only reinforces the fact that they feel that flat-chested women need to blow up their bust lines to achieve sexiness: “Don’t have voluptuous curves? Fake ‘em!” Ah yes, because nothing makes me feel more confident than putting in my fake temporary boobs in order to wear a dress.
Yet we here at Jezebel still want to provide a general set of guidelines for women who seek some guidance when it comes to “dressing for your shape.” And so we’ve compiled a list, so that you’ll never accidentally put a “boyish” frock on your “busty” frame again. Heaven forbid!
Snork: If you are shaped like a Snork, we highly recommend this casual ensemble. Not only will you be dressed to thrill, but the matching bows on the side of your head will take the attention off of the giant strawlike appendage you use for breathing. Because breathing is so 2008!