The Academy Introduces Major Changes to Increase Oscar Diversity

Illustration for article titled The Academy Introduces Major Changes to Increase Oscar Diversity

In response to the overwhelming whiteness of this year’s Oscars (and Hollywood’s diversity problem in general), and as promised by president Cheryl Boone Isaacs, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has introduced a major overhaul to their membership process.

In a statement on their website, the Academy outlined the changes they plan to make to ensure that the voting population of the organization does not remain, as it is now, comprised of mostly old white men.

Variety reports that the so-called “emergency board meeting” took place on Thursday night with Cheryl Boone Isaacs and Academy CEO Dawn Hudson deciding not to wait until the next scheduled board meeting on January 26 to make these changes.

Advertisement

The steps they plan on taking are designed to increase the diversity of Academy members, as well as ensure that those who are inactive in the film industry are not allowed to remain voting members like they’re Supreme Court justices.

Beginning later this year, each new member’s voting status will last 10 years, and will be renewed if that new member has been active in motion pictures during that decade. In addition, members will receive lifetime voting rights after three ten-year terms; or if they have won or been nominated for an Academy Award. We will apply these same standards retroactively to current members. In other words, if a current member has not been active in the last 10 years they can still qualify by meeting the other criteria. Those who do not qualify for active status will be moved to emeritus status. Emeritus members do not pay dues but enjoy all the privileges of membership, except voting. This will not affect voting for this year’s Oscars.

In addition to a “global campaign” to recruit new members, they also plan on immediately adding three new seats to the Board of Governors.

Currently the board has 51 members, and every single one—with the exception of Isaacs and cinematographer Daryn Okada—is white, while only 17 (including Isaacs) are women. They also plan to add new members to its committees and executive boards immediately.

Advertisement

While we’ll have to wait to see what tangible changes these decisions produce, it is hard to deny that it was the noise made by people like Lupita Nyong’o, Spike Lee, Will Smith and Viola Davis that helped get the ball moving. Additionally, the Twitter hashtag created by April Reign #OscarsSoWhite has been a major player in the call for more representation.

This year’s white nominees and notable snub of films like Creed and Straight Outta Compton sparked conversations about the waning importance of the Academy Awards and whether they’ve become outdated as they fail to afford equal opportunities and reflect the demographics of America.

Advertisement

Contact the author at kara.brown@jezebel.com .

Images via Getty.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

I found the reviews for Straight Outta Compton too unimpressive to convince me to buy tickets to a film I otherwise had no interest in (its top critics reviews were at 78%, which is below what will make me consider attending a film).

To my mind, it was Tangerine and Beasts of No Nation that were snubbed. Creed has terrific reviews, but I was more interested in the novel, complex performances and stories of the first two films. They were each innovative in their own ways. Tangerine starred unknown trans actresses and was shot on an iPhone. Beasts of No Nation should have been Oscar-bait: its material is important and affecting, it was actually shot in West Africa (which has frequently not been the case for films meant to portray the region). Unfortunately, I think that one of the things about it that was so innovative - being released on Netflix - may have hurt its cause. I was glad to see the Netflix documentary on the Ukraine recognized in nominations.