Richard Dawkins Thinks 'Mild Pedophilia' Is No Big Deal

Illustration for article titled Richard Dawkins Thinks 'Mild Pedophilia' Is No Big Deal

New theory: Richard Dawkins is a hardcore evangelical Christian masquerading as an atheist to give non-believers a bad name. It's going well, because he recently said that "mild pedophilia" isn't too bad and we should all accept it as a natural part of growing up, like "mild rape" or "mild limb severance."

Advertisement

From RNS:

In an interview in The Times magazine on Saturday (Sept. 7), Dawkins, 72, he said he was unable to condemn what he called "the mild pedophilia" he experienced at an English school when he was a child in the 1950s.

Referring to his early days at a boarding school in Salisbury, he recalled how one of the (unnamed) masters "pulled me on his knee and put his hand inside my shorts."

He said other children in his school peer group had been molested by the same teacher but concluded: "I don't think he did any of us lasting harm."

"I am very conscious that you can't condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours. Just as we don't look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism, I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild pedophilia, and can't find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today," he said.

Ah, the olden days, when a well-meaning man could put his hand in a boy's shorts and it was all in good fun.

Peter Watt, director of child protection at the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, pointed out that those who have been abused and suffered the repercussions for decades may disagree.

"Mr. Dawkins seems to think that because a crime was committed a long time ago we should judge it in a different way," Watt said. "But we know that the victims of sexual abuse suffer the same effects whether it was 50 years ago or yesterday."

Image via AP.

DISCUSSION

burtreynoldsismyspiritguide1
Rebecca "Burt" Rose

I know everyone is really rage-y about this, but that whole statement makes me sad. First of all, it doesn't surprise me to see another abuse victim defend their abuser. Here's someone who, as a young, defenseless child, was victimized by abuse AND now thinks it is OK. That is basically how abuser manipulation work; they brainwash you into believing that 'hey, there's nothing wrong with what I'm doing! It's fine. All these people telling you what we're doing is bad, they're the ones who are wrong!"

And now he's becoming the bad guy, because he doesn't even grasp, as smart as he is, the very basic way in which he was manipulated to believe all that. And he's spreading this sickness.

Holy shit, what a mind fuck. How fucking sad that this is the cycle of abuse.