Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

Not Even Christina Hendricks Is Safe From Photoshop

Illustration for article titled Not Even Christina Hendricks Is Safe From Photoshop

In the new issue of Ok! magazine, there's a "behind the scenes" spread of Christina Hendricks at her photoshoot for London Fog. The unretouched shots show just how much the ad folks altered Hendricks' famous curves.

Advertisement
Illustration for article titled Not Even Christina Hendricks Is Safe From Photoshop

The spread in Ok! features a few different photographs, including ones in which Christina is wearing the leopard-print trench coat.

Advertisement
Illustration for article titled Not Even Christina Hendricks Is Safe From Photoshop

While these are not the same image, it is the same coat. And it's clear that in the final ad (on the left), Hendricks' waist and hips have been narrowed considerably.

Illustration for article titled Not Even Christina Hendricks Is Safe From Photoshop

When you outline her hourglass shape in the ad on the left, and lay it over the untouched image on the right, it becomes obvious that her waist-to-hip ratio wasn't good enough for the coat company. She was made more svelte.

Advertisement
Illustration for article titled Not Even Christina Hendricks Is Safe From Photoshop

Here, the ad is compared to another shot of Christina Hendricks in the leopard coat. Even with the stylist in the way, it's evident that her actual hips are wider than the hips depicted in the London Fog ad.

Advertisement
Illustration for article titled Not Even Christina Hendricks Is Safe From Photoshop

Here's a third view, where it's apparent how much her waist was cinched — digitally, and not by the coat's belt.

Advertisement
Illustration for article titled Not Even Christina Hendricks Is Safe From Photoshop

When the untouched image is layered over the ad, matching up the curve of her hip on the left, the lower right side displays how her hips and legs were chopped.

Advertisement

We cover lots of Photoshop disasters, but this one really stings: We'd ordinarily applaud the company for hiring a curvy, voluptous model instead of the usual rail-thin types we're inundated with. But why would London Fog choose an actress known for her fantastic, fleshy figure — and then change that figure into a less wide and therefore more "acceptable" shape? We haven't the foggiest. Showcasing Christina Hendricks' body in the media sends a message that there isn't just one way — lanky, thin, runway model-esque — to be sexy. And with the wave of a mouse in Photoshop, London Fog negates that message.

Christina Hendricks for London Fog [Tom And Lorenzo]
'Mad Men' Star Christina Hendricks Lends Her Sex Appeal To London Fog's Fall Campaign [NYDN]
Earlier: Christina Hendricks As The Face Of London Fog

Advertisement

Related: Why You Must See Unretouched Images, And Why You Must See Them Repeatedly

Advertisement

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

ZemarSea-Urchin
ZemarSea-Urchin

I'm going to out on a limb here (a precarious one) and say that I see the need for the photo-shop. This chick has a wonderful body but that coat ain't doing her figure any favours. If that coat can't flatter her hotness than I for one wouldn't buy it. So, to sum up: photo need shopping to bring back her figure because the coat doesn't flatter. Now, I'm not saying she doesn't look good, she does. I'm just saying another style might be more fitting for her shape. Hell, even alterd it still isn't flattering its just all boob. People with heavy chests shouldn't buy this coat based on the fit in the photo.

/rambling