Desperate Ohio GOP Claims Ballot Measure Would Overrule Federal Ban on an Abortion Procedure
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine (R) is now claiming that Issue 1 could bring back a specific procedure that he voted to ban as a Senator in 2003.
AbortionPolitics

In less than two weeks, Ohioans will vote on Issue 1 with early voting already underway. And conservatives in Ohio simply can’t stop lying about the abortion ballot measure that would enshrine the right to reproductive health decisions in the state constitution.
They’ve been lying about what the amendment would do, lying that it’s not necessary, and now they’re telling the biggest tall tale: That, if passed, Issue 1 would overrule a federal ban on an abortion procedure that’s been in effect for more than 15 years. It’s absolute nonsense designed to get people to vote against it, or not vote at all, amid polls showing Issue 1 is polling favorably. (The pro-choice position is to vote “yes.”)
In the final weeks of voting, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine (R) and other top Republicans are fearmongering that Issue 1 could lead to the return of a procedure known as dilation and extraction, or D&X, which was previously used for both abortions and miscarriages in the second and third trimesters. Conservatives refer to this procedure using the non-medical term “partial-birth abortion,” and you can see how this inflammatory language might rile up voters about abortions later in pregnancy.
DeWine recently told reporters that he opposed Issue 1 because he claimed it would allow D&X procedures. “For many years, in Ohio and in this country, we’ve had a law that said a ‘partial-birth abortion’—where the child is partially delivered and then killed and then finally delivered—was illegal in Ohio,” he said. “This constitutional amendment would override that.” Attorney General Dave Yost (R) also made this claim in a legal analysis of Issue 1, and the Republican-controlled Ohio Senate passed a resolution saying similar.