A Reminder That Victorian Porn Is Nastier, Kinkier, and Much Better Than Victorian Art

Latest
A Reminder That Victorian Porn Is Nastier, Kinkier, and Much Better Than Victorian Art
Screenshot: (Twitter)

This morning, The Guardian published an interview with university lecturer Sarah Williamson, creator of ArtActivistBarbie, a movable protest of sorts that places Barbies in front of famous paintings to protest of gender imbalances in museums and the male gaze as the arbiter of what constitutes female beauty in art. “Refuse to be the muse,” one of Barbie’s signs reads, “All a bit of a pre-Raphaelite wet t. shirt competition here” reads another featured in the article, titled “That’s Not Art It’s Victorian Porn!”

These statements immediately caused alarm among myself and others on the Jezebel staff, for obvious reasons: we are deeply offended by incorrect comparisons of dull old nudes to very fun Victorian porn. Unlike the little flashes of naked ass and peek-a-boo nipples on display in most museums, Victorian porn is much, much better, more detailed, and nastier than anything in the paltry little paintings Barbie is protesting. In the 1800s, as photography became a means of encapsulating the times, so too did it become a method of documenting sexuality without all the smooth, hairless bodies, surgically enhanced breasts, shaved vulvas, and monster dicks of today—just normal people getting weird, and for the most part, appearing to enjoy themselves.

Image: (Wellcome Collection )

Victorian pornography is also a rich and varied tapestry of sexuality, kink, and gender fluidity (among countless other fluidities). While we tend to think of Victorians as a generation of sexually repressed grandmothers, they were, in fact, a rabidly horny group of people who covered table legs with skirts out fear that even inanimate objects could inspire barely corseted, brimming lust to boil over into full-on dry-humping mid-tea service.

Image: (Wellcome Collection )

There’s value to studying sexism in art, of course, but automatically labeling any random, boring old nude “pornography,” especially as a pejorative, is more an indicator of present-day hangups than an informed exploration of the past. Victorian porn is art, but the stuff Barbie’s protesting in the museums ain’t it.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share Tweet Submit Pin