Why Is Hillary Clinton Trying to Rewrite Nancy Reagan's Shameful Inaction on HIV/AIDS? [Updated]

Illustration for article titled Why Is Hillary Clinton Trying to Rewrite Nancy Reagan's Shameful Inaction on HIV/AIDS? [Updated]

Hillary Clinton, in trying to say something nice about the late First Lady Nancy Reagan, instead said something highly inaccurate. During an MSNBC interview Friday, Clinton praised Reagan for her HIV and AIDS work, when the Reagan administration was notoriously slow and detrimental to fighting the disease early on.


She said:

It may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980s. And because of both President and Mrs. Reagan—in particularly Mrs. Reagan—we started a national conversation, where before, nobody would talk about it, nobody wanted to do anything about it. And that too is something that I really appreciate with her very effective, low-key advocacy, but it penetrated the public consciousness, and people began to say, ‘hey, we’ve got to do something about this too.’

Look, it’s nice to romanticize people when they’ve passed on, but it’s much better to be accurate when describing their strengths. Nancy had a good record urging support for Alzheimer’s, something from which her husband suffered. However, when it came to the Reagans’ relationship with the HIV and the AIDS epidemic, they were not so on point. In fact, their then-White House spokesman Larry Speakes poked fun at the staggering epidemic in the early 1980s, according to The Guardian.

Meanwhile, scores of people, gay and straight, were becoming infected and dying, including the Reagans’ good friend Rock Hudson, whom Nancy reportedly turned her back on when he asked for help to secure treatment.

In 1985, via BuzzFeed, Hudson traveled to France to try an experimental treatment called HPA-23—which wasn’t available in America—with a Parisian doctor. After arriving, he passed out at the Ritz Hotel before receiving treatment and his publicist asked the Reagan’s for a transfer to a nearby military hospital where a French doctor could see him. But after a commanding officer at Percy military hospital turned Hudson away because he wasn’t a French citizen, Mrs. Reagan didn’t step in to help her friend, who she’d known for decades from the couple’s Hollywood days.

So, in a memorandum to Bill Martin, a special assistant to Reagan with the National Security Council, Weinberg then summarized the situation and his call with the first lady.

“I spoke with Mrs. Reagan about the attached telegram. She did not feel this was something the White House should get into and agreed to my suggestion that we refer the writer to the U.S. Embassy, Paris,” he wrote at the time.


Hudson was eventually admitted to the hospital but he died weeks later—and this was a friend of the Reagan’s. And as for the thousands who didn’t have a personal relationship with the First Family, years passed before President Reagan mentioned the epidemic publicly, let alone did something about it.

One doctor named Marcus Conant, one of the first health professionals to diagnose and treat AIDS, told The Guardian he met with the Reagan administration in 1983 to request federal help. He was told by Reagan’s representative that it wasn’t a health issue as much as question of the law.

“Her response was [that] this was a legal problem, not a medical problem,” Conant said. Simply because of who gay men with Aids were and who their sexual partners were, she told him, “these people were breaking the law”.


In a separate incident, another Reagan representative inferred that the gay population was “such a small minority that people in authority didn’t even run across them. That’s the mindset of the administration at the time.” And finally, in 1987, Conant wrote President Reagan directly requesting help to fight the then 21,000 people who’d died of the disease. Reagan’s response was “‘Nancy and I thank you for your support’.”

Ultimately, the policy of the Reagans’ was to look the other way as much and as long as possible regarding HIV and AIDS. So unless she’s practicing her shade, perhaps the former Secretary of State should either do her homework on Nancy or keep to saying ‘may she rest in peace.’


Updated: Shortly after the segment aired, Clinton released this statement.


Contact the author at Hillary@jezebel.com.

Image via MSNBC.



Why Is Hillary Clinton Trying to Rewrite Nancy Reagan’s Shameful Inaction on HIV/AIDS?

Because we’re taught that it’s not polite to speak ill of the dead on the day of their funeral?

The blame lies squarely on Ronald Reagan’s shoulders, not Hillary Clinton’s.