On Monday night, protesters took to the streets of Baltimore hours after the funeral of Freddie Gray, a young man who died following injuries he sustained while in police custody. Last night, Baltimore’s Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake stood before news cameras, asking for peace and calling the protesters “thugs,” all without acknowledging the root of the problem—cops who think breaking a suspect’s spine by driving too fast in a squad vans is acceptable. And who’s telling them it isn’t?
At the Baltimore Sun, Doug Donovan and Mark Puente wrote about the many other victims of Baltimore police department’s “rough rides,” described as when a person is cuffed and put in the back of a squad van, then driven around in such a reckless, fast manner that their body slams around the van’s walls, injuring them. This practice is “unsanctioned,” but clearly happens so often that the city has paid out millions to people like Alston who’ve been paralyzed and sometimes killed like Gray because of these “rides.” It would’ve been great if Mayor Rawlings-Blake mentioned that bit.
Alston sued, and … A jury awarded Alston $39 million, but he and the city settled for $6 million. In settlements, the city generally does not acknowledge liability; the officers involved in the case did not face disciplinary actions.
Alston’s attorney, Philip Federico, said Thursday that the Gray case brought back memories of Alston, who died about eight years ago. What jumped out was that both men had asthma and were denied when they asked police for inhalers, he said.
The piece lists numerous other people who suffered this “rough ride,” like 27-year-old librarian Christine Abbott.
“They were braking really short so that I would slam against the wall, and they were taking really wide, fast turns,” Abbott said in an interview that mirrored allegations in her lawsuit. “I couldn’t brace myself. I was terrified.”
“You feel like a piece of cargo,” she added. “You don’t feel human.”
Dehumanization is obviously the goal of the “rough ride.” Police instruct their suspect that they, the cops, hold the power over whether that person lives or dies in that moment and, whatever they decide, there will likely be no consequences. Mayor Rawlings-Blake could’ve said this also. However, the protests in Baltimore, and across the country, have shown that the assumption of no consequences is no longer viable, at least not in terms of social unrest.
Police can no longer kill civilians with impunity and trust that they’ll be exonerated by a unequal legal system, or that everyone will just go home and forget about it. People are tired of being brutalized, tired of seeing a new victim’s name nearly every day, pairing that person’s senseless death with the name of yet another police officer behind the gun and in Baltimore, the wheel. Now, instead of head-shaking, there are protests and riots. When the system preaches peace but deals violently with its civilians, we see the emperor has no clothes on and the people take to the streets.
As Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote at The Atlantic on Monday night:
When nonviolence is preached as an attempt to evade the repercussions of political brutality, it betrays itself. When nonviolence begins halfway through the war with the aggressor calling time out, it exposes itself as a ruse. When nonviolence is preached by the representatives of the state, while the state doles out heaps of violence to its citizens, it reveals itself to be a con. And none of this can mean that rioting or violence is “correct” or “wise,” any more than a forest fire can be “correct” or “wise.” Wisdom isn’t the point tonight. Disrespect is. In this case, disrespect for the hollow law and failed order that so regularly disrespects the rioters themselves.
Now, with all that you’ve just read, here’s what Mayor Rawlings-Blake did say via Twitter, which she doubled-down on during her press conference last night, posted above.
Then on Tuesday morning:
OK, girl. But you know what would be amazing, Mayor Rawlings-Blake? If you directed those statements to the police you work so closely with, and not in some back room with your city’s police chief. I understand that walking the line between calling for police accountability and supporting the constituents who voted for you is a tough spot, especially considering how New York City Mayor DeBlasio was treated by NYPD after Officer Daniel Pantaleo killed Eric Garner on camera and didn’t receive any punishment but this is the job. But you need to do better, Rawlings-Blake, because, right now, you look like the woman who is protecting the people who are killing your voters. Like Malcolm X once said, “If you’re not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.”
Image via AP.
Contact the author at Hillary@jezebel.com.
DISCUSSION
From my Facebook page regarding this and the “what about black on black” crime shit I keep reading posted by other black folks:
That is why it’s easy for her to get up there and say “thug” as though it was interchangeable with the word “nigger.” Because it is. And to her and many other black people with that mindset, it’s “those” type of black people who cause the problem. They do their best to use their education, position, influence to help keep the status quo and some even go harder to persecute their own than a racist white person might do to show their commitment to being aligned with the powers that be and against “those type of black people.” I see her as the embodiment of that.