Trump Pardons Woman Who, Like Him, Only Wanted White Women to Vote

Illustration for article titled Trump Pardons Woman Who, Like Him, Only Wanted White Women to Vote
Image: Mandel Ngan (Getty Images)

On Monday, President Trump told reporters on Air Force One that he would be “doing a pardon tomorrow on someone who is very, very important.” He didn’t tease out any additional details, only noting that the pardons would not be granted to former National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden or Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national security advisor.


So, who the hell did Trump plan on pardoning? Another one of his pals? Joe Exotic, the Tiger King? Another Alice Johnson so he could pretend to give a shit about black people? Can he pre-emptively pardon himself?

Well, it’s Tuesday, and the cat’s out of the bag: The Associated Press reports that President Trump will pardon... Susan B. Anthony, a woman he probably found out about within the last 24 hours.

Anthony, arguably the best-known figure of the women’s suffrage movement, was arrested in Rochester, New York in 1872 for voting, a violation of laws that prohibited women from casting their ballots. Conveniently, Tuesday is the 100th anniversary of the ratification of the 19th amendment of the United States Constitution, which granted women the right to vote. Of course, many black women were still subjected to the same archaic, racist voter disenfranchisement tactics regardless as they were before of such strides. (Not that Susan B. “I will cut off this right arm of mine before I will ever work or demand the ballot for the Negro and not the woman” Anthony would have cared).

On top of the obvious shallowness of this gesture—a clear effort to get the vague suburban housewives” bloc he keeps talking about to like himit’s ironic that Trump is posthumously honoring a voting rights advocate while he and his administration actively aim to suppress the vote and skirt any and all chances of having a viable general election in November.

Staff writer, mint chocolate hater.


Kinjas in the Outfield

As expected, the comments are a whole lot of “actually what she really meant...” up to an including stories of her apparently having an underground railroad???

You can claim that Anthony and Stanton and the rest simply wanted rights for all instead of just black men but the fact of the matter is they stood in the way of ending Jim Crow and they got their rights before segregation ended. If they really wanted rights for all, why did they stop when they got voting rights?

That revisionist narrative is the same mess people use when talking about how gay marriage was for all when the anti-trans bathroom bills were happening years later.