Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

The Guardian Says Teenager 'Let Herself' Be Sexually Assaulted

Illustration for article titled The Guardian Says Teenager Let Herself Be Sexually Assaulted

A Guardian writer recently described one of the subjects of a documentary about teenagers and the internet as a girl who "let herself be gang raped" to get her Blackberry back. When readers freaked out, the paper changed the phrasing to "let herself be sexually assaulted." Seriously?

Here's the edited paragraph from the Guardian:

In one, a girl who does not reveal her identity, talks with heartbreaking candour about how she would do anything for her BlackBerry; when a gang of boys takes it from her she recounts how she allowed herself to be sexually assaulted in order to have it back.

Advertisement

And the accompanying note:

The standfirst to this article was amended on 12 September 2013. It originally referred to a girl who "let herself be gang-raped" to get her BlackBerry back. This misrepresented the text of the piece, which says she allowed herself to be sexually assaulted.

Advertisement

The paper was so stoked on this line that they included it right up top, in the subhed: "the girl who let herself be sexually assaulted to get her BlackBerry back."

I haven't seen the documentary, but here are two rewrites that don't blame the victim for being assaulted: "The girl who was sexually assaulted by a group of boys who wouldn't give her back her phone." Or perhaps "the group of rapists that demanded sex as collateral for a clunky phone." Ta-da!

Advertisement

Ironically, writer Tim Adams asked the filmmaker if she "sees an inbuilt gender imbalance in some of the tone of social media. Does the medium itself work to encourage misogyny, in her view?" He's not helping, either.

[The Guardian]

Image via sgm / Shutterstock.com

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

seize
Seize: it's about ethics in gossip journalism

This is part of the greater meme that poor people don't need cell phones. Cell phones are the most vital piece of infrastructure you can buy for $400 by an order of magnitude. Godawful story, but this dumb fucking reporting just makes the point which the Guardian can't fucking seem to stomach: cellphones are a life-or-death necessity in our culture.