Some Disgruntled British Dude Is Suing Belle de Jour for Defamation

Illustration for article titled Some Disgruntled British Dude Is Suing Belle de Jour for Defamation

Brooke Magnanti, the research scientist/former sex worker behind Belle de Jour, is being sued for defamation by an ex-lover, who’s pursuing damages for defamation and breach of privacy, and wondering (quite vociferously) out loud to anyone who will listen, i.e. the Mail, if Magnanti ever really was a sex worker.

Advertisement

That’s a pretty bold suggestion considering that Magnanti has, since her blog’s run in 2003, turned her experiences as a sex worker into a best-selling book and a sequel before finally outing herself to the Times of London back in 2009. In that revelatory interview, Magnanti explained that she took up prostitution as a way to earn some quick money as she was finishing up her Ph.D., and that Belle de Jour was a way of openly acknowledging that period in her life.

Owen Morris, a 38-year-old former Royal Air Force Pilot, was apparently part of that former life, and has recently claimed that he was identified as “The Boy” when Magnanti finally outed herself, and that he and Magnanti were dating during the first half of 2004, the period of time her first book supposedly covers.

More from the Guardian:

Morris claims he was identified as "The Boy" when Magnanti outed herself in the media and says the blog, which depicted the life of a London sex worker, was first written while Magnanti was a PhD student in Sheffield, and that during the first half of 2004, a period covered in the first book, she had a job and relationship with him rather than being single and unemployed as portrayed. He also claims Magnanti fabricated "clients" and characters in her books by writing about her sex life and relationship with him.

Morris now claims that the Belle de Jour outing destroyed his life, costing him a job and his privacy. Meanwhile, Magnanti, who’s now married and living in the Scottish Highlands, has told her blog’s faithful visitors that Morris’s claims represent merely some funhouse mirror version of a reality he once experienced: as evidence of her sex work (and of Morris’s knowledge of her sex work), she’ll be presenting a notebook she kept about her appointments, along with her bank records from 2003-04 showing the money she made as an escort. So there, haterzzz.

[Guardian] [Daily Mail]

DISCUSSION

Squifstery
Squifstery

Meh, they're probably both full of shit. "Records" don't mean anything here.

Quite frankly I am really really disappointed that some scumbag women still feel the need to perpetuate the myth that prostitutes and strippers make loads and loads of money. No, they don't.

And as just about everybody knows, all grad students - especially those in the sciences, as Belle claims she was - are provided with more than adequate stipends, scholarship money and grant money, particularly at European universities where tuitions aren't sky high.

If you're a grad student in the sciences, you don't need to turn to prostitution to make ends meet. You're working at school about 70-80 hours a week and have no time for anything. And unless you have a coke problem or need to bathe in 50 year old whiskey, you should be able to survive just fine on your stipends and grants. This last one especially applies to people in Europe where health insurance costs aren't an issue.