On Caring About More Than One Thing At Once

Illustration for article titled On Caring About More Than One Thing At Once

A quick Twitter search for "Amy Winehouse" leads to a page riddled with finger wagging superiority. "Now everyone forgot about Norway!" remarked one. "Kids get shot all the time; Amy Winehouse only dies once," remarked another. Fjord kayaking Christ with a beehive. It's possible to care about more than one thing at a time. Remarking on one tragedy does not mean that you aren't aware of another, that you don't feel bad about it, that your heart doesn't go out to its victims. Why is it so difficult to resist moralizing mourning, and why are we so quick to gauge one's Humanity Score from a handful of social networking posts?

Advertisement

Amy Winehouse's death resonated with people for different reasons than the attacks in Oslo did. Amy's job was to be a performer. Her art connected with people on a personal level, and because art is subjective, it makes sense that her passing would lead to many people who she personally affected commenting on how she impacted them.

Perhaps people are more willing to discuss Amy Winehouse because they feel more qualified to discuss what happened to her. Individual tragedy is easier to wrap one's mind around, and we feel like we can digest its pieces- one woman with immense talent, gone too soon. Her songs were played on the radio, so it's reasonable to assume that Amy Winehouse is a part of an experience that many of us have shared. We can bring it up and expect an exchange to ensue. Norway's tragedy, in contrast, is so much bigger than one talented woman who appears to have died a victim of her own vices. It's millions of unknown faces, of people we've never met (or who aren't commonly known as individuals) who mourn for their countrymen and their own lost sense of security. It's an extremist with an almost unreadable manifesto shooting a gun at children. It's mental cacophony, and it's difficult to muster a comment beyond, "That's terrible" or "How awful."

Advertisement

If the only world event worth commenting on is the most severe tragedy, then where does the pissing contest end? Yes, what happened in Norway was terrible, but what about what happened in Japan? What about what happened with the Asian tsunami? What about 9/11 here in the good ol' US of A? (You said you'd never forget!) What about everything bad that ever happened?

Keep your thoughts with Norway, tell everyone about it all the time if you want to, direct every one of your Facebook friends to donate to the Red Cross, but chastising others for not devoting enough social networking space to a greater tragedy doesn't help the Norwegians, it helps you look like a sanctimonious jerk.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

hotpinklovesofa-has-left-the--old
hotpinklovesofa has left the building

Jezebel is not a hard news site, it is primarily a fashion and entertainment site with a feminist slant. If you're using Jezebel as your only source of news and expect it to update accordingly then you're terribly misinformed about the site and probably about world events in general. Jezebel likely held it's coverage of Norway in order to wait for more information on the incident and the terrorist(s) in question so as to find an angle that works specifically for this site that is aimed at covering feminist issues. Amy Winehouse dying was covered almost as soon as it happened b/c it was an easy post with information about the subject readily available. No we don't know the truth about how she died but it's not that hard to put up a bio and give as many details as were available at the time she was found dead in her flat.

All too often I get the feeling that people only come to this site to post comments that they think make them look like a better feminist or a better human being b/c they care about "bigger issues." It's not up to you to judge what's a bigger or greater issue nor is it up to you judge someone's feminism and contribution to women's rights simply b/c they don't agree with you 100% on a subject that was covered here on Jezebel. If all you're doing for women in the world is posting unquestionably politically correct comments on a website then you're not doing much at all.

I realize I went off on a tangent at the end. Oh fucking well.