A Gay Guest Lecturer and the Firing That Shook a Christian College’s Campus
A guest speaker at Oklahoma Christian shared stories of resilience with a class, which some saw as funny, even reassuring. Others said they were dangerous.
In DepthIn Depth 
                            Graphic: Rebecca Fassola
For some, spring is no match for a chill that has settled over Oklahoma Christian University (OC), a private university near Oklahoma City affiliated with the Churches of Christ congregations. In March, news broke that graphic arts professor Michael O’Keefe, who worked at the school for 41 years, had been fired as a result of comments made by a guest speaker. O’Keefe had invited the speaker, Scott Hale, in the hopes that Hale’s stories about persevering as a young gay man would inspire the students in his class “The Business of Branding Yourself.” By one account, that of the school’s chief legal counsel Stephen Eck, those stories included “inappropriate and graphic language of a sexual nature,” as Eck alleged in a letter sent to faculty and staff, along with details of Hale’s “history of exposing his genitals to others and leading others to participate in a game he called ‘truth or dick.’” Six days after Hale spoke to his class, O’Keefe was fired. He was shocked.
Eck was not in the classroom during Hale’s speech, and his recap clashes with the accounts of several people who were, including O’Keefe, Hale, OC’s theological librarian, and student Sean Peterson. In an interview with Jezebel, Peterson explained, “His whole speech about being gay… what he said I thought was nothing out of the ordinary, really.” Hale’s supposed “history of exposing his genitals” was in actuality a story about peer pressure among 10-year-old boys, Peterson recalled: “Scott wanted to try to be like the rest of the cool kids,” so he agreed to do one “dare,” and “one of his classmates asked him to show his genitals.” Hale also used the word “dick,” which Peterson found “kind of shocking.” He told Jezebel he is “not a huge supporter of LGBT,” but nonetheless “didn’t really think too much about” the presentation.
“In our twenties, I feel like everyone should have a mature mind towards the human body,” said Peterson, who maintains a relationship with O’Keefe, performing garden duties at the former professor’s residence. “I mean, we’re in the art department. Seeing the human anatomy, from female to male, should be nothing new at all.”
The university’s termination notice to O’Keefe, signed by Eck, cited “gross misconduct, conduct contrary to the mission and values of Oklahoma Christian University, and disregard of the policies and values of the university.” In a statement to NonDoc, Eck claimed that O’Keefe was fired for these offenses after a “thorough review process,” though neither O’Keefe nor Hale say they were interviewed before O’Keefe was fired. In an ethics complaint letter that voiced solidarity with O’Keefe, which Jezebel obtained, the other faculty member in the room that day, theological librarian Chris Rosser, wrote that he, too, had not been interviewed prior to O’Keefe’s firing. O’Keefe said that on March 7, he was told to get off campus and never come back. “I went back to my office and it was already locked,” he said.
After the story broke, suspicion that O’Keefe had been fired because he brought in a gay speaker was palpable on campus and in the media. As if to push back against speculation that the university’s decision had been motivated by homophobia, a letter Eck wrote to students and faculty, which was published in full by Oklahoma City’s News 9, included this line: “The unchallenged language used and content shared with students is unacceptable in any class at OC no matter who says it or the speaker’s orientation.”
“My life, my commitment, my sacrifices for the school for 41 years are reduced down to three minutes. Are they kidding me?”
Over the course of our multiple conversations, O’Keefe spoke passionately about what he sees as the disservice performed on Hale and the students: OC’s action reduced human experience. O’Keefe’s goal via his curriculum, including his choice of guest speakers, had been to cultivate nuance. The fired professor did not express bitterness about losing his job, but did emphasize the unfairness of the situation as he sees it: “My life, my commitment, my sacrifices for the school for 41 years are reduced down to three minutes. Are they kidding me?” In his view, the university’s response didn’t merely distort the details of Hale’s presentation—O’Keefe told Jezebel by phone that it “objectified him and stereotyped him.” “It was very homophobic,” said the fired professor. “It reduces an individual and takes away their humanity by tagging them because of their sexuality.”
If O’Keefe’s allegations of homophobia are true (the university has not responded to multiple requests for interview), this case can be considered part of a wave of anti-LGBTQ animosity in the U.S., where we have seen the passage of so-called “don’t say gay” bills, legislative attempts to block gender-affirming care for trans kids, a seemingly still-climbing trans murder rate, and a Republican-led effort to revive the harmful, false, and decades-old stereotype that gay adults and their supporters are out to groom and molest children. That particular lie was key to the rhetoric of the likes of Anita Bryant in the ‘70s, which echoes in OC’s suggestion that Hale was describing predatory behavior. The idea that a speaker merely testifying his gay life should cause the firing of the tenured professor who invited him to do so seems straight out of that decade as well. But, according to several sources who spoke to Jezebel, it happened in Oklahoma last month.
O’Keefe invited speakers to his classroom to share their stories of resilience—the roster also included a former mafia wife who survived domestic abuse, and a Vietnam vet who recounted stabbing an enemy soldier to save his own life, according to Peterson—and Hale was no exception. “So he happens to be gay,” explained O’Keefe. “His story is about self-love, reconciliation with his parents, and finally coming to accept himself for who he is. He did not in any way propagate his belief system or his choice of a partner. He was telling his story, and hopefully the students realized life’s not easy and there are no normal people and there are no ordinary days.”
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
- 
        
        
            
 
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
        