Of Course Rihanna Is Naked on GQ's 'Men of the Year' Issue

Illustration for article titled Of Course Rihanna Is Naked on emGQ/ems Men of the Year Issue

Just like British GQ ran out of clothes for Lana Del Rey's cover photo, there wasn't a lot provided for Rihanna, in terms of wardrobe, for the "Men Of The Year" issue of American GQ.

Advertisement

Since Rihanna is not a man, she's not technically a Man of the Year, but instead called "Obsession Of The Year". Fine. But why isn't she allowed to wear clothes? There are three different covers for this issue, and spoiler alert: Ben Affleck and Channing Tatum were provided with shirts. Rihanna, most likely, has no problem with this. Fine. She seems to love being naked, on Instagram and whatnot. It's not really about her, anyway.

Illustration for article titled Of Course Rihanna Is Naked on emGQ/ems Men of the Year Issue
Advertisement

Look. We all know how men's magazines work, we've all heard "sex sells," there's no use pretending that this is surprising. Rihanna's cover makes headlines for her and for GQ. That doesn't mean it's not sad. Doesn't meant it's not frustrating.

Let's not forget, as Scientific American puts it:

Numerous studies have found that feeling objectified is bad for women. Being ogled can make women do worse on math tests, and self-sexualization, or scrutiny of one's own shape, is linked to body shame, eating disorders and poor mood.

Just imagine a little girl who looking at the three covers and wondering why the lady is the only one with no clothes on. What message is she getting about her body? What has she learned about a woman's worth?

Additional shots:

Illustration for article titled Of Course Rihanna Is Naked on emGQ/ems Men of the Year Issue
Advertisement
Illustration for article titled Of Course Rihanna Is Naked on emGQ/ems Men of the Year Issue

[GQ, The Week, NYDN ]

Earlier: GQ Ran Out of Clothes for Its Woman of the Year

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

LeadVillain
LeadVillain

What is the point of this article? It's not like she's a scientist or a politician or an athlete or a lawyer and they've asked her to take her clothes off and objectified her. She's a POP STAR. Her job is TO BE A SEX SYMBOL. That's literally her job. Oh and maybe she makes some shitty songs once in a while, but primarily she is there to look good and be sexy.

There's something weird going on at Jezebel where you guys have deluded yourselves into thinking Rihanna should be some kind of ultra strong, independent feminist role model and you keep writing articles about all the ways she keeps letting you down on that front. She's just a dumb pop star with a good body and a pretty face. That's it. Stop idolizing her if you don't want to be let down all the time.