Advertisement
Advertisement

Following Fox’s onslaught, Bernard became a right-wing target. “I’m concerned not only for my reputation and what that might do to my employment, but also my personal safety,” Bernard told the IndyStar.

This is how anti-abortion zealots target abortion providers in a non-violent manner. Do you have enough to pay for attorneys fees? Do you think you’ll be able to get a job afterward? And that’s before we consider all the actual violence abortion providers are threatened with.

Advertisement

Instead of leaving this case in the past, Rokita is attempting to access the 10-year-old’s records as part of his investigation, which stems from complaints made by people who are not Bernard’s patients.

“The consumer complaints were 100% filed by people who had never met Dr. Bernard, had never gotten medical care from Dr. Bernard, were not involved in the care of this patient in any way shape or form,” Kathleen Delaney, Bernard’s attorney, said in a press conference on Friday. “They’re complaining about something that they saw on television or heard about on social media.”

Advertisement

Indiana Deputy Attorney General Caryn Nieman-Szyper told the court that state law requires Indiana child protective services be notified about child abuse, even if the case was already being investigated in Ohio. Officials also allege that Bernard violated state reporting requirements on abortion. However, public records show Bernard reported the abortion within three days, as state law requires.

Nieman-Szyper also said Bernard is under investigation because she publicly talked about the case, saying she had not sufficiently demonstrated that she was given permission to do so by the family.

Advertisement

Bernard maintained that she did not publicize identifying details, and merely shared the facts of the case: “I did say that the patient had been raped. That is how a 10-year-old becomes pregnant.”