From Underwear To Kids' Toys: Gender Segregation In Shopping

Illustration for article titled From Underwear To Kids' Toys: Gender Segregation In Shopping

The toy industry magazine Playthings poses an interesting question: if Chinese department stores don't segregate their underwear section by gender, why must we segregate our toys?

Advertisement

In a post for the magazine's Out of the Toy Box blog, Richard Gottlieb writes,

[T]he notion of gender in toys is so ingrained in our thinking that we never stop to think that maybe it's not a fact of nature but rather a cultural outlook that we impose.

That was the thought that I had when coming upon an underwear department in a Chinese department store. To my surprise, the women's and men's underwear were merchandised in one department: The underwear department.

Obviously, in this culture (or certainly that department store) the western notion of merchandising by gender did not prevail. Wouldn't it be interesting if we took a step back and stopped merchandising by gender?

Wouldn't it, indeed? While the store Gottlieb visited may not represent all Chinese department stores, his observation does show that even underwear — something we think of as extremely gender-specific — isn't always separated by gender. As Gottlieb notes, this raises the question of what would happen if we stopped dividing toy stores into pink and blue aisles. But it also made me wonder why stores make gender divisions in the first place.

In the case of underwear, stores might fear that women would be uncomfortable shopping alongside men — although the few men usually browsing the Victoria's Secret racks make clear that we can usually handle it. Perhaps managers also think men won't want to shop around girl stuff, like bras, which is possible — but this is probably culturally determined. I doubt that men are congenitally unable to open their wallets in the presence of lingerie — strip clubs are a testament to that. Most likely, store managers and merchandisers just feel most comfortable breaking down customers into demographic groups, and one of the main groups is gender.

You'd think that the rise of online shopping would fix this problem, but as we noted last holiday season, gender categories for toys persist on the web. And if I want to buy, say, a button-down shirt with no goddamn darts, I usually have to go to the men's section of the e-commerce site of my choice. I don't mean to say that all items should be marketed equally to men and women — moobs aside, for instance, women will always be the main consumers of bras. It's just that in many cases, stores might be more interesting and consumer-friendly if they came up with smarter divisions than gender. As Gottlieb says, this is especially true when it comes to toys. Just as there's little actual difference between action figures and dolls, there's little reason to suspect that kids want their toy stores separated into boys' halves and girls' halves — except insofar as everyone tells them that's what they want. Of course, the commercialization of gender may benefit retailers, by allowing them to sell essentially the same product in two different, gender-"appropriate" packages. And department stores are unlikely to be on the forefront of social change. Still, there's a certain power in knowing that it doesn't have to be this way, that alternative modes of merchandising exist — even if they're half a world away.

Advertisement

Underwear And The Toy Department [Playthings: Out of the Toy Box Blog]

DISCUSSION

arianabarr
arbarrtheaardvark

As somebody who runs the toy department in a store, I feel I should weigh in here... Yes, there is a problem with marketing certain toys as "for boys" or "for girls," and keeping them divided as such on the shelf. However... when you talk about there being "pink and blue aisles," what you're taking issue with is the manufacturers, not the retailers. The manufacturers decide "this toy will appeal more to girls - we should make the box pink and have the logo done in glitter." The retailer says "this toy is used for x, so we will put it next to the other toys used for x." I'm not saying that there isn't a much broader and more complex problem - what I'm saying is that the problem is much broader and more complex than the merchandising. Now, nothing pisses me off more than an exchange like the following:

Middle-Aged Woman: "Do you have any Etch-A-Sketches?"

Me: "Well, we don't have full-size ones, but we have these small travel ones. They're super fun!"

MAW: "Hmm... well, I'm buying it for a boy. Just a little something extra for the stocking"

Me: "Awesome! Yeah, I used to love Etch-A-Sketches. I wish we carried the full-size, but what can you do. This'll be perfect if it's a stocking stuffer, though, what with it being so small."

MAW (giving me annoyed look): "But they're all pink and purple."

Me: "Oh. We must be sold out of the green. I know a lot of boys think pink is too girly, but the purple should be fine. Just don't say anything about it and he probably won't even think of it."

MAW: "But it's purple. I'll just look around for something else."

Yes, that is seriously not okay. And I get the whole chicken-egg thing comes into play. But seriously... it's not the retailer's fault if all of the arts and crafts kits come in pink boxes. And it's not the retailer's fault if all the science toys come in deep blue boxes (although my opinion on that, is that it reminds the customer of the night sky, thus making the product seem more science-y). I will say that the products my store carries do tend to be pretty equal about the children shown in the marketing. The weave-your-own-scarf kits do tend to have girls all over them, but the science and nature stuff usually has pretty even numbers.

And one last thing... I think the whole part about wanting a shirt without darts is a bit ridiculous... I mean, wanting a button-down without darts... I could complain about not being able to find a lot of things in the women's section that I need. I can't find a fashionable bra that fits. I can't find button-downs with large enough chests. I've only ever found 2 dresses (same cut, different print) that flattered my figure without showing off 4/5 of my cleavage. But I deal with it, because it would be silly to expect anywhere near a majority of retailers to carry such a wide selection of items so as to cater to my not-so-common requests. Button-downs for women are commonly made with darts because in most cases, that's very flattering and helps the shirt fit better. There's nothing wrong with wanting one without darts, but hell, it has absolutely nothing to do with the merchandising.