Foreign Language Oscar Nominees Condemn 'Climate of Fanaticism' in the U.S.

Photo: AP (Pictured: Asghar Farhadi with his 2012 Oscar for “A Separation”.)
Photo: AP (Pictured: Asghar Farhadi with his 2012 Oscar for “A Separation”.)

On Friday, the six directors nominated in this year’s foreign language Oscar category issued a joint statement denouncing what they called, “the climate of fanaticism and nationalism today in the U.S. and in so many other countries, in parts of the population and, most unfortunately of all, among leading politicians.” The directors did not mention any politicians by name but it doesn’t take too much imagination to figure out who they’re writing about.


The letter goes on to read:

“Regardless of who wins the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film on Sunday, we refuse to think in terms of borders. We believe there is no best country, best gender, bet religion or best color. We want this award to stand as a symbol of the unity between nations and the freedom of the arts.”

The statement was signed by Asghar Farhadi, Martin Zandvliet, Hannes Holm, Maren Ade, Martin Butler, and Bentley Dean. The directors dedicated the award for which they are nominated to, “all the poeple, artists, journalists and activists who are working to foster unity and understanding, and who uphold freedom and expression and human dignity.” You can read the full statement here.

When Donald Trump—who, after five weeks, remains our dangerously egomaniacal president—signed a travel ban on some predominantly Muslim countries in January, many outlets reported the Farhadi, an Iranian director and one of the letter’s signatories, would not be permitted to attend the Oscars. Farhadi quickly responded that he wouldn’t attend the Oscars even if he could.

The letter was released two days before the 89th Academy Awards ceremony, and only a few hours before the Associated Press reported that immigration authorities have barred 21-year-old Syrian cinematographer Khaled Khateeb—who was nominated for an Oscar for his work on The White Helmets—from entering the U.S., so he will of course not be able to attend the ceremony. The AP’s reporting, based in part on an internal Trump administration correspondence, found that the last-minute ban was implemented because U.S. officials discovered “derogatory information” about Khateeb.


Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Gillian Christensen implied in her comment to the AP that the freeze on Khateeb’s travel plans had something to do with irregularities in his travel documents. “A valid travel document is required for travel to the United States,” Christensen said.

contributing writer, nights


Heywood U Cuddleme

About those “valid travel documents”. My parents live in one European country where they have been citizens since 1980. They emigrated from their home country in 1973. Both countries are nice, peaceful countries with predominately christian populations, i.e. harmless according to Trump’s logic. They wanted to visit the U.S., but their visas were denied because they didn’t have the passport numbers of the passports they used when they left their birth country in 1973. Does that seem reasonable to anyone? The U.S. isn’t becoming a dictatorship, it’s becoming a caricature of a dictatorship. I told my parents they were better off not going