Female Flasher Goes Free Because There's No Proof She's Aroused

Illustration for article titled Female Flasher Goes Free Because Theres No Proof Shes Aroused

Occasionally the double standard works in women's favor, though that may not be a good thing. Annette Kaiser has been flashing people in Berlin, but police can't do anything about it due to a law that says exposing yourself to people isn't a crime unless you're aroused. A police spokesman breaks the problem down: "If a man drops his trousers, it is easy to see he is excited, but with a woman that is not possible." Kaiser says she feels flashing is freeing, and adds, "I like to show off my body. I give men an eyeful and then I'm quickly gone." What about the dudes, who aren't necessarily interested in getting an eyeful? (There have to be some, right?)

Advertisement

Image via aliisik/Shutterstock.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

grace-darling-old
grace darling

Oh dude, you were doing so well until that last sentence.

Also, I think this is a double-standard that's underpinned by some pretty solid logic. A man who is aroused and flashing a woman is making an implicit threat by flouting sexual and social boundaries. It becomes an act of sexual aggression. This is what is means to live in a rape culture.

A woman who is aroused and flashing a man is still transgressing boundaries, but her actions aren't underpinned by the suggestion that her body can be used as a weapon. Like it or not, there just isn't the same subtext to the act.

Of course, the double-standard is also fed by raunch culture, the male gaze, and the trillion other factors that make female sexual performativity the norm - like, I dunno, a Jezebel writer suggesting that it's a rare man who doesn't enjoy copping an unasked-for eyeful - but I don't think this is one of the instances where some kind of societal truth is revealed when genders are neatly flipped, my-mother-the-surgeon-style.