​Doctor Acquitted in Egypt's Very First Female Genital Mutilation Trial

Illustration for article titled ​Doctor Acquitted in Egypt's Very First Female Genital Mutilation Trial

Earlier this year, Egypt broke some serious ground by arresting Dr. Raslan Fadl and charging him for manslaughter of Sohair al-Bata'a, a 12-year-old girl who died while he was performing a female genital mutilation (FGM) operation on her. Many hoped the case would deter both family members and doctors from continuing FGM, banned since 2007 and criminalized since 2008. Unfortunately, both the doctor and the girl's father who was also facing criminal charges have been acquitted.


The Guardian reports:

No reason was given by the judge, with the verdict being simply scrawled in a court ledger, rather than being announced in the Agga courtroom.

Despite the fact that Sohair's parents admitted to taking her to Fadl's clinic specifically for a FGM procedure, Fadl claimed that he would never perform such an operation as it was against religious teaching. He claimed he had removed a wart from her pubic area and that she had died from an allergic reaction to penicillin. Meanwhile Egypt's forensic authority released a report saying that "what happened in the genital area of the girl was a clear circumcision operation."

Fadl and Sohair's mother reached an out-of-court settlement and Fadl was ordered to pay 5,001 Egyptian pounds, or almost $700 USD to the Sohair's mother.

"Of course there will be no stopping any doctor after this. Any doctor can do any FGM he wants now," said Atef Aboelenein, a lawyer for the Women's Centre for Guidance and Legal Awareness, who was the first to find out the verdict.

Equality Now, along with local lawyers plan to appeal the court's decisions, while activist bodies have planned to engage with Egypt's rural community about FGM in an effort to curb the practice.

Image via AP.


Every single time I read anything about FGM online (and its quite frequent) what is absolutely the most frustrating bit, is reading a ton of MRA types who immediately chive in with a "male genital mutilation is WRONG, what about the MEN, why is now one talking about THAT". It makes me want to pull out my hair. I don't agree with circumcision for boys, as clearly it violates their bodily integrity, but Jesus Christ how can anyone even compare the two?