Dartmouth's Greek Council Unanimously Passes a Promising New Sexual Assault Policy

Illustration for article titled Dartmouth's Greek Council Unanimously Passes a Promising New Sexual Assault Policy

Dartmouth's Greek council unanimously passed a new sexual assault proposal that will make it easier to both report incidents and penalize those found responsible, according to The Dartmouth.


The new policy mandates sexual misconduct education, leadership training and formalizes organizations' responses to individuals found responsible of sexual misconduct, but perhaps most notable is that it eliminates the need for internal adjudication processes and standardizing sanction delivery. This is important because sexual assaults on college campuses are underreported in part because the bureaucratic procedures involved are so often disorganized and overwhelming; in Dartmouth's case, fraternity and sorority members had to deal with both the school's Committee of Standards and the Greek Leadership Council.

"One of the most important recommendations that presidents told me was that they don't want to spend time adjudicating their peers when they don't know anything about the case," GLC moderator Duncan Hall ('13) said.

Here's how it's explained in the proposal:

First, as students, we are not qualified to conduct our own independent adjudication
processes, especially those pertaining to sexual misconduct. Thus the best way that we
can enact sanctions with integrity is by relying on a process and organization that is
qualified to conduct an adjudication process.

Second, we seek to avoid peers adjudicating their peers. With these sanctions set clearly
in place, no student will be forced to adjudicate a brother, sister, or friend.

Now it's up to the sexual assault survivor: frats and sororities may still use the internal adjudication system if he or she would rather bring the case before his or her fellow students instead of the school's Committee of Standards. (If that's the case, the Panhellenic Council can still temporarily boycott the specific frat or sorority involved.)

The policy also fast-tracks consequences — "If a Greek member is found responsible for sexual misconduct by the COS, the GLOS director will notify the chapter president of the individual found in violation of the code of conduct. This must occur within 48 hours of receiving a report of the individual's sanction from the Office of Undergraduate Judicial Affairs." — as well as strengthens them: for example, students who are suspended or placed on two or more terms of probation by COS are immediately and permanently removed from their Greek organization.


It'll go into effect immediately. Awesome.

[The Dartmouth]



Am I wrong in thinking that universities shouldn't have their own sexual assault judicial process in the first place? I understand the argument of why they might be necessary to achieve some measure of justice considering the sorry state of police investigations (and I certainly support all the changes that have been made thanks to Joe Biden and the like), but it still seems like having a whole mechanism of handling sexual assault "in house" seems somewhat designed to protect rapists. Universities generally don't handle drug trafficking "in house."