California Could Become Next State to Pass ‘Right to Die’ Bill

Illustration for article titled California Could Become Next State to Pass ‘Right to Die’ Bill

The California State Assembly approved legislation which would allow terminally ill patients to be prescribed medication to end their lives. This was the second attempt to pass the bill, following the 2014 case of Brittany Maynard. Last November, Maynard, who was diagnosed with brain cancer, decided to move from California to Oregon so she could access the state’s “Death with Dignity” law and legally end her life. Before her passing, Maynard recorded videos pleading with lawmakers to pass the act in California and other states.


According to the Los Angeles Times, the End of Life Option Act would require patients to submit two oral requests, at least 15 days apart, plus a written request which would be signed in front of two witnesses. The attending physician would personally receive all three requests.

Assembly members spoke both in favor and against the bill, which passed by a vote of 42-33. Catharine Baker (R-Pleasanton) supports the measure. “I, as a Christian, do not pretend to know what God has in mind for all of us, why there is pain or suffering in this world. But I do know he is a merciful God. And we have the ability to allow others to have a choice,” she said. “I believe it is cruel, nothing short of cruel, to deny them that choice in their final hours and final days.”

Some assembly members offered personal stories to support their arguments. From the LA Times:

Assemblywoman Cheryl Brown (D-Rialto) told lawmakers about her son, who was near death. Doctors urged her to let him go. Nineteen days later, he came off life support. He survived, and is now a husband and father. “Doctors don’t know everything,” Brown said.

Assemblyman Luis Alejo (D-Watsonville) argued the bill would allow those suffering from terminal illness to end their suffering in a peaceful and dignified manner. Alejo’s voice choked with emotion as he talked about his father, who is in pain suffering from terminal bone cancer, and how his father wanted to make his own decisions about the end of his life. “Respect his choices,” Alejo said.

The proposal will now go to the Senate, then onto Governor Jerry Brown. If the measure is approved, California will become the fifth state to legalize physician-assisted suicide, joining Washington, Oregon, Vermont and Montana.

Contact the author at

Image of Debbie Ziegler, holding photo of her daughter Brittany Maynard, via AP.


Masshole James, Unstable Genius

I’m for it as long as we don’t turn into Belgium and eventually start allowing doctors to (what’s the word...kill? assisted suicide?) people who are depressed and even people who haven’t given explicit consent. That is the only thing that makes me nervous about this. Also, I can imagine several horrible ways spouses/family members of people with mental illness can also take advantage of this bill to get rid of someone they find to be a burden.…

The present paper provides evidence that these laws and safeguards are regularly ignored and transgressed in all the jurisdictions and that transgressions are not prosecuted. For example, about 900 people annually are administered lethal substances without having given explicit consent, and in one jurisdiction, almost 50% of cases of euthanasia are not reported. Increased tolerance of transgressions in societies with such laws represents a social “slippery slope,” as do changes to the laws and criteria that followed legalization. Although the initial intent was to limit euthanasia and assisted suicide to a last-resort option for a very small number of terminally ill people, some jurisdictions now extend the practice to newborns, children, and people with dementia. A terminal illness is no longer a prerequisite. In the Netherlands, euthanasia for anyone over the age of 70 who is “tired of living” is now being considered. Legalizing euthanasia and assisted suicide therefore places many people at risk, affects the values of society over time, and does not provide controls and safeguards.