British Couple Clone Puppy Using DNA from Their Deceased Dog

Image for article titled British Couple Clone Puppy Using DNA from Their Deceased Dog

After an eight-year-old boxer dog named Dylan died after being diagnosed with a brain tumor and suffering from cardiac arrest, his owners, a British couple named Laura Jacques and Richard Remde, decided to clone him. When Dylan died in June, the grieving couple began research on the cloning process, ultimately deciding on using the South Korean-based Sooam Biotech Research Foundation — for a mere $100,000.


According to the Guardian, Jacques and Remde took samples of their dead dog and delivered them to Sooam. Multiple samples were extracted from the pup, with Remde having to fly to South Korea twice, until the firm was able to successfully perform the cloning.

The male puppy, which they named Chance after a character in the Disney film, Homeward Bound, was born on December 26. The couple flew to South Korea to witness his birth. “After they got him out I still couldn’t quite believe it had happened,” Remde said. “But once he started making noises I knew it was real.” He described the dog as having the same exact patterns on his body as Dylan did. Another puppy is expected to be born in three days.

This case was particularly exciting for the firm because the samples were taken 12 days after the dog had died. “This is the first case we have had where cells have been taken from a dead dog after a very long time,” David Kim, a scientist at Sooam, said. “Hopefully it will allow us to extend the time after death that we can take cells for cloning.”

“I’m trying to get my head round the fact that this puppy has 100% of the same DNA as Dylan,” Jacques said. “It’s quite confusing but I’m telling myself that Chance is just like one of Dylan’s puppies.”

There are currently no regulations on the cloning of pets, though the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals describes it as a “serious concern.” Their website states: “The process involves scientific procedures that can cause pain, suffering and distress. We believe that animals are often being cloned with little consideration for ethics or animal welfare.”

Contact the author at

Image via the Guardian.



Does anyone else think that the world is divided into

a)people who have animals as pets or not; and

b)people who have furbabies as .......furbabies?

I have a pet dog, and I love him and he comes inside when the weather is bad and he gets all the dog stuff he needs and vet care and we play with him but he is a dog, and not equal to human family members in importance.

I know people who have dogs as furbabies and they go to doggie daycare and have Christmas stockings and naming ceremonies and jewellery and are the focal point of the family. They are equal to human family members in importance and their owners get upset that the law sees them as property and not as people.

Which do you do? I don’t think either is bad, people should do what they want to do as long as the animals are cared for.