Artist Who Created Charging Bull Statue Says Fearless Girl Statue Is Ruining Everything

Image via Getty.
Image via Getty.

In honor of International Women’s Day, ad agency McCann New York and investment firm State Street Global Advisors placed the Fearless Girl sculpture in Bowling Green Park, facing off with the Wall Street Charging Bull. Like most women figures she’s had to carry a lot of baggage. The tiny bronze statue is now bearing responsibility for pain inflicted on the creator of her nemesis, the Bull.


The Boston Globe reports that Arturo Di Modica, the Italian-born sculptor who so elegantly formed the Bull’s famous ball sack, is demanding that the City of New York admit that they never notified him about their intention to add the Fearless Girl to the park. Though she was intended as a temporary installation for the week, The Fearless Girl’s selfie popularity encouraged Mayor Bill De Blasio to extend her stay for almost a full year:

Di Modica calls the statue an ‘‘advertising trick’’ created by two corporate giants — Boston-based State Street Global Advisors and McCann, its New York advertising firm.

The Italian-born sculptor says the presence of ‘‘Fearless Girl’’ infringes on his own artistic copyright to the ‘‘Charging Bull,’’ by changing the creative dynamic to include the other bold presence.


He’s not entirely wrong, but it’s somewhat ironic that Di Modica has a problem with the statue being placed there without going through the proper channels. The Charging Bull was dumped by the artist in front of the the New York Stock Exchange without a permit, following the 1987 stock market crash. The city’s population loved the bull so much that officials agreed to keep it, though it was transferred to its current location. Typical that a girl statue gets criticized for finding success the same way a very masc bull statue did.

Contributing Writer, writing my first book for the Dial Press called The Lonely Hunter, follow me on Twitter @alutkin

Share This Story

Get our newsletter



Let me get this straight. Man drops some artwork downtown in form of protest. City loves it and permanently adopts artwork. Another artest drops a different piece of art near the first one as a form of protest/tribute and the first artist is now complaining about his copywrite?