Advertisement
Advertisement

The video implores the viewer to pause to read the company’s own little investigation: “Take note: alleged abuse was around 2014-2016, got divorced 2016, makeup palette release date: December 2017.” It then cuts to a hallway with Milani posters (headquarters, perhaps?) where a young women walks with a product catalog before showing us a powerpoint slide (seen at the top of this piece). According to the video’s screenshot, the Milani Conceal + Perfect All in One Correcting Kit (Item code MPCC-05) was released in 2017—presumably meaning it couldn’t have been in Heard’s makeup case for the time when she alleges it was.

Ending with a manicured finger tapping 2017, the video concludes by zooming in on the year all while a cartoon voice sings, “There’s one thing you can expect from me, and that’s the unexpected... cause I’m an international...super spy. Super spy!”

Advertisement

Let’s make one thing abundantly clear: Brands do not have to do this. I know it’s hard out there in the content mines, but wading into a trial where intimate partner violence is at the heart of it all is a bold and aggressive way to try to make a high-profile trial about your brand. I would even argue that brands do not have to take a side in celebrity litigation—even if they are mentioned.

Not since the missing person-turned-murder case of Gabby Petito has TikTok turned into a place where the FYP (“For You Page”) is flush with videos from a trial. TikTok is an app where the algorithm is king, but using a non-trending sound to make a 15-second clip about a libel trial? Not now, Milani social media team!

Advertisement

Jezebel reached out to Milani Cosmetics and will update if any response is given.