5 Looks At Venus Williams’ Ass(ets)

This image was lost some time after publication.
This image was lost some time after publication.

Venus Williams' recent French Open display of her assets (and by that I also mean her clothing line and her masterful tennis prowess), has upset a few people who feel that the wardrobe choice was risqué and inappropriate.


What can we can all learn from a lingering look at Williams' behind?

1. Even a professional, successful woman like Venus Williams believes that she has to be sexy and not just skilled in order to sell a product. Off the court, the ensemble could pass for lingerie. As a businesswoman, Williams seems to believe that sexy is the best way to market to her target audience even though the look is neither entirely practical for her sport nor appropriate for young girl tennis players.

2. Black women's bodies are products that produce cash for white patriarchy. Lest the naysayers forget, Williams had to get permission from the Women's Tennis Association to wear her outfit during the tournament. I find it hard to believe that the decision-makers didn't consider the economic appeal of a young, sexy woman player looking half-naked on the court. The blogosphere and YouTube are already riddled with commentary implying that Williams has a great body and should play naked. My guess is that many of her fans are not regular French Open audiences.

3. Black women's behinds are still an international spectacle. It's wildy ironic that Venus Williams and "The Hottentot Venus" share a name and spectacle status because of their bottoms. The original black Venus was Sara Baartman, an African slave displayed across Europe as a freak show because of her unusually large buttocks, genitalia and other distinct physical features. Even after her death she was an object of scientific allure-many of her body parts were preserved for display. Of course, according to Latoya Peterson, black booty body politics are frequently discussed in contemporary popular culture. Peterson notes that she had to learn to appreciate her curves as an alternative beauty standard while at the same time negotiating the unwarranted attention that her curves drew.

4. Flesh-colored underwear now includes dark brown in addition to beige. For all the brown-skinned women out there, I hope Williams' line permanently includes them. Every woman knows, if you're gonna show your drawers, they should be same color as your skin. It's just polite. Which is why I was surprised at the amount of people who automatically assumed that Williams wasn't wearing panties. Why would a woman show up to her job and show her behind without panties? This moment tells me that too many people still believe the stereotypes of the innately indecorous black woman who does not know how to dress, let alone behave, in public.

5. A woman athlete receives more attention for what she wears than how well she plays. Props to Tracy Clark-Flory of Broadsheet who made a point of noting that Williams decimated her opponent Patty Schnyder with consecutive 6-3 victories while "maintaining her number two world ranking while dressed for the Moulin Rouge."


All of those important lessons learned, I am proud to have the opportunity to discuss the wardrobe choices of an African American woman on top of the world's tennis game, because they are her choices as opposed to the forced displays of her historical predecessor. Black women's body displays are still very often problematic because of their associations with patriarchy and profit, but as Williams helps us understand, black women are exercising more control over those bodies than they ever have before.

Image: Creative Commons, ShareAlike 2.0 Generic.

This post originally appeared on the Ms. blog. Republished with permission. Want to see your work here? Email Us!



Totally agreed about everything else, but about the idea that Williams is wearing those kinds of outfits because she feels pressured into sexifying herself in order to sell herself as a product...

The thing is, Venus in particular has a personal history of media attention that's less about being made to symbolise sex against her will/withour her permission, and more about the media consistently trying to shame her for looking "masculine". So I have to wonder if maybe her motivations might be a bit different than someone else's might. Clearly I can't read her mind, but I do wonder if she's dressing like this as a sort of fuck you to the media/public that's consistently tried to shame her for looking "masculine". Not so much to sell a product, more as an act of defiance.