Heh. Someone posting on Wilson's blog left this little gem: "There are more interesting, original and funny ways to write than by slapping around people who weigh more and make less than you. If you're looking for journalistic inspiration, Cintra, I recommend reading Sadie Stein's work: impressive, in all possible respects." I'm dying to know which member of the Jezebel commentariat slid that wonderful wee line in. It was you, wasn't it?
@Dodgergirl: Call me cynical, but I don't feel like even this one is sincere. This one strikes me as PR- and boss-mandated.
Oh, and if anyone's curious, NY Mag's The Cut fashion blog is following all of this, and their comments seem to be as unimpressed with Ms. Wilson's article as we are.
@deltabella: No, I think that's a fair point... I just want to hope she really thought about what she wrote and why it would be hurtful, but I think it's likely an editor was involved.
@Dodgergirl: I in no way think she is being sincere, not to be a jerk. I think she probably realizes now that she might be in trouble, and is trying to save her ass. Honestly, the entire debacle makes me think ill of the New York Times. For god's sake, papers are falling left and right. Put out a quality product, or else you might be next, NYT. Between her and Maureen Dowd, it seems more like the Daily Mail than an actual publication for news.
The entirety of her original fauxpology, that is now deleted. Apologies for length.
"Today's J.C. Penney piece in the Times has brought me more angry mail full of wounded feelings than I have ever previously received.
Take, for example, this message I received from "Kat":
"SKANKY ANOREXIC BITCH. GO EAT ANOTHER PIZZA AND THROW IT UP."
It seems that I have come off, in this article, like some skinny New York snot who is cackling and snickering at the expense of overweight persons. It is pressing a lot of painful buttons I didn't intend to press with people who struggle with weight issues.
I feel this article is in keeping with the generally irreverent spirit of Critical Shopper. It is a piece about the store itself and the clothes in it, and how they compare to other clothes in neurotic New York: what is the same/different about them, style-wise. J.C. Penney has had the foresight and genius to realize that plus-sizes are all but completely ignored in Manhattan, and because of this, they are going to make squillions of dollars.
It is actually a positive review, believe it or not.
My writing style is generally pretty scathing, even when I like something. Nothing is sacred in a Critical Shopper -- and that's why you read it.. But it's not so fun, apparently, if you happen to take something irreverent I say about a mannequin or an inventory personally.
Let me put the record straight: I don't have any negative feelings at all about extra weight -- I think fat is totally sexy and gorgeous. I saw the light on this way before I interviewed Beth Ditto, even. I'm an unregenerate chubby chaser. I didn't write the piece from an inner place of look-ist elitism or anti-fat condescension.
I have no anti-fat prejudice whatsoever... So maybe I wasn't careful enough. I wasn't trying to soft-pedal any negative feelings or pussyfoot around any unspoken revulsion.
To any overweight persons I may have unintentionally offended with today's article: I apologize anyway, because your feelings were hurt, and I honor and respect your sensitivities. The piece was definitely not aimed or intended as any kind of slight or personal attack on anyone over size 4 -- I was just addressing Penney's with the same level of savage bluntness I apply to everything and everyone else -- especially Sarah Palin.
I welcome your vents, rantings, etc.
Love,
Cintra"
@srhbks: Thanks for this! I missed it earlier.
Anyone know if there's any way to get the original comments, too? I'm really interested to see how people responded -- since I'm assuming she removed the post because she couldn't handle the reaction.
@greeneyedfem: Sorry! After I posted this I closed the window, and I when I tried to get it back it didn't show the post. :( The best of the comments was the first one- I think it was a friend or longtime follower and she made it clear to Wilson that it was a shitty column because she was picking on people that take this shit every day- or something like that. It was the only comment that Wilson responded to.
@srhbks: OK, telling a skinny woman to "eat a pizza" is just as wrong and insulting as telling a fat girl to put down her donuts.
But I also think it's interesting that she picked on illegitimate criticism of her piece, and ignored the completely valid criticism.
@srhbks: Also, I don't "struggle with weight issues". I'm fat and I don't care. I think in the end that's the point that she can't understand - that it's possible to be a size 16 or even a size 26 and still be completely in love with your body and with fashion.
How about this? Don't give us an apology. We didn't ask for it. Give us an explanation. I'm a size 0, I have never shopped at these stores and I was immediately offended.
I want an explanation for the slant of her topic. If you're covering new stores, fine, but what were you trying to say? Who was your audience? What were you trying to convey to them? It's called cognitive writing. And what came across, perhaps without premeditation, was disdain.
Don't 'apologize' for it. Explain it. Maybe people will listen and take it seriously. And maybe you'll understand why people were offended and it's not because 'they shop there' or are 'fat'.
@wtfox?!: By which I mean Sadie, who actually wrote the post, but my edit function has vanished so I don't get to pretend like my mistake never happened.
@Anna: That's so strange. I thought the responses were pretty civil, all things considered. Maybe she wrote it hoping for a chorus of "you're so right!"s and "apology ACCEPTED"s and was disappointed by the critiques of her statements.
what's with the jezebel isn't fat, she's just got big bones thingy in the top right? i also love her whole...oh i love fat people, i have a fat friend type reasoning...ugh.
That's okay Cintra, I'm sorry that you're a mean, condescending elitist who has delusions of witty and edgy, too.
You made fun of the mannequins? Really? Really really?
Separate point: Don't you love how she only apologizes to "overweight persons" who may have been offended? As if her condescension couldn't be offensive us all? Any person with a sense of empathy for those unlike herself would be offended.
08/12/09
08/12/09
[www.cintrawilson.com]
08/12/09
08/12/09
Oh, and if anyone's curious, NY Mag's The Cut fashion blog is following all of this, and their comments seem to be as unimpressed with Ms. Wilson's article as we are.
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
"Today's J.C. Penney piece in the Times has brought me more angry mail full of wounded feelings than I have ever previously received.
Take, for example, this message I received from "Kat":
"SKANKY ANOREXIC BITCH. GO EAT ANOTHER PIZZA AND THROW IT UP."
It seems that I have come off, in this article, like some skinny New York snot who is cackling and snickering at the expense of overweight persons. It is pressing a lot of painful buttons I didn't intend to press with people who struggle with weight issues.
I feel this article is in keeping with the generally irreverent spirit of Critical Shopper. It is a piece about the store itself and the clothes in it, and how they compare to other clothes in neurotic New York: what is the same/different about them, style-wise. J.C. Penney has had the foresight and genius to realize that plus-sizes are all but completely ignored in Manhattan, and because of this, they are going to make squillions of dollars.
It is actually a positive review, believe it or not.
My writing style is generally pretty scathing, even when I like something. Nothing is sacred in a Critical Shopper -- and that's why you read it.. But it's not so fun, apparently, if you happen to take something irreverent I say about a mannequin or an inventory personally.
Let me put the record straight: I don't have any negative feelings at all about extra weight -- I think fat is totally sexy and gorgeous. I saw the light on this way before I interviewed Beth Ditto, even. I'm an unregenerate chubby chaser. I didn't write the piece from an inner place of look-ist elitism or anti-fat condescension.
I have no anti-fat prejudice whatsoever... So maybe I wasn't careful enough. I wasn't trying to soft-pedal any negative feelings or pussyfoot around any unspoken revulsion.
To any overweight persons I may have unintentionally offended with today's article: I apologize anyway, because your feelings were hurt, and I honor and respect your sensitivities. The piece was definitely not aimed or intended as any kind of slight or personal attack on anyone over size 4 -- I was just addressing Penney's with the same level of savage bluntness I apply to everything and everyone else -- especially Sarah Palin.
I welcome your vents, rantings, etc.
Love,
Cintra"
08/12/09
Anyone know if there's any way to get the original comments, too? I'm really interested to see how people responded -- since I'm assuming she removed the post because she couldn't handle the reaction.
08/12/09
08/12/09
But I also think it's interesting that she picked on illegitimate criticism of her piece, and ignored the completely valid criticism.
08/12/09
08/13/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
I want an explanation for the slant of her topic. If you're covering new stores, fine, but what were you trying to say? Who was your audience? What were you trying to convey to them? It's called cognitive writing. And what came across, perhaps without premeditation, was disdain.
Don't 'apologize' for it. Explain it. Maybe people will listen and take it seriously. And maybe you'll understand why people were offended and it's not because 'they shop there' or are 'fat'.
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
404ing your mistake doesn't really work like that, Cintra.
08/12/09
She took her ball and went home. Incredible.
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
You made fun of the mannequins? Really? Really really?
08/12/09
08/12/09