i read the AP story about this, and according to them all the test subjects were given condoms. none of these stories mention the condoms. and it's not clear to me how much of this HIV "prevention" is due to the vaccine, or just the subjects using the condoms?
"All were given condoms, counseling and treatment for any sexually transmitted infections, and were tested every six months for HIV. Any who became infected were given free treatment with antiviral medicines.
I heard a BBC interview regarding this on the way to work this morning. While 31% is a modest number (especially when looking at the amount of devastation that HIV/AIDS causes), it's much better than where we were before. It's stepping stones like these that will help in eradication of the disease. From a big-picture standpoint, this is definitely good news. After all, vaccines for polio and MMR didn't come lickety-split either.
The line "a glimmer of hope in the battle to end one of the biggest public health nightmares of the past 25 years" gave me chills. A teacher in my high school died of AIDS in the fall of 1982. I don't even think it was called AIDS then. Read "And The Band Played On" by Randy Shilts (R.I.P.) for a chilling and infuriating look at how the Moral Majority (nowadays = Value Voters) have always been quite happy to let the people they disapprove of die.
@Anna N.: I think it's generally accepted that HIV began to spread throughout the United States in the 60's. It just didn't have a name and was done unknowingly.
@Anna N.: I'll look for the paper but I remember reading that they tested some stored tissue from years ago and found traces, maybe the 1920's or 30's? Again, I'll have to try to find it but those dates seem right to me. / CORRECTED - from the Encyclopedia of Aids, Volume 1 (2003) 'Backtracking The Aids Virus', pg 30 - the earliest trace found in a stored blood sample traces back to 1959 in Kenya, and in the U.S. a 1969 New Orleans teenager. So that presence suggests the virus was active before 1959. The theory is that it exploded in the late 70's & 80's due to a perfect storm of international travel, sexual freedom and biased research funding. (See below - Moral Majority & Reagan)
And I found the previous name - GRID or 'Gay Related Immune Deficiency' The reason Reagan and his people didn't properly fund the early research was because they felt it was ONLY occurring in the wrong type of people. Gah. (link is sciency, but interesting)
While it is hopeful, it is reporting on unpublished data, so quite possibly no-one has had a chance to independently analyse the statistics yet. A quick calculation shows the result is statistically significant at p=.005 (p=.003), but I don't know enough to know if that standard level is good enough for a vaccine trial like this. Basically, science means nothing until its published in a peer reviewed journal.
Would sex education change? Unfortunately, I doubt it. Doesn't anyone remember abstinence advocates arguing against the HPV vaccine because it would supposedly encourage teenagers to have sex? It's like they don't understand the concept that if all STDs were preventable, there would be no reason to fear and discourage sex.
@ytuhermanotambien: No, I'm sorry, you misunderstand. If all STDs were preventable we would have to fear and discourage sex even more because we would be circumventing Gawd's chosen plan of punishing us filthy mortals for rubbing our feel-good parts on each other. And therefore we'd be much more likely to go to hell. Or not need someone else to tell us how to make ourselves feel better. And that is just a horrifying prospect. Can't have people enjoying themselves without understanding the dire consequences of their filthy, filthy acts!
@morninggloria: Is no one going to address the shocking absence of "people with disabilities" from this list? People in wheelchairs! The deaf! The mentally challenged!
@andBegorrah: Modesty will cut you! Modesty is one bad motherfucker. Modesty is the name of my imaginary guard dog who stands poised at the edge of my vagina ready to attack any trespassers.
outrage over the DC std program? outrage over anything in the failing system?
surely you jest.
the only constituency i can see objecting to this in any real way is congress. see: needle exchange programs.
@La Chica Lucy: Gaah, tried to edit and now my comment is all eff'ed up!
My original point was that I find the phrase "accidental rape" pretty damn offensive. When someone says "no" to a sexual act and you proceed anyway, well, that's rape. Unless, what? Maybe, she slipped on a banana peel?
@La Chica Lucy: However, I almost want to say something stupid like "he was asking for it!!!!!" because every single fucking time a woman gets raped, everyone needs to ask if she was dressed slutty or if she was drinking. So, maybe guys who hire strippers are asking for it?
I'm just being annoying, it's not that I actually think he deserved it, but I wish people would see the idiocy behind blaming victims for their own rape.
If I were a dj at the stripperific radio station i"d play a constant loop of Cherry Pie, Pour Some Sugar On Me, Back in Black, and Cash Machine. And then turn on my webcam and watch the dollars pile up. Or not.
09/24/09
"All were given condoms, counseling and treatment for any sexually transmitted infections, and were tested every six months for HIV. Any who became infected were given free treatment with antiviral medicines.
09/24/09
Push on sciency people. Push on.
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
[books.google.com]
And I found the previous name - GRID or 'Gay Related Immune Deficiency' The reason Reagan and his people didn't properly fund the early research was because they felt it was ONLY occurring in the wrong type of people. Gah. (link is sciency, but interesting)
[cultronix.eserver.org]
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
You're welcome, Seth Macfarlane.
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
09/24/09
08/07/09
surely you jest.
the only constituency i can see objecting to this in any real way is congress. see: needle exchange programs.
08/07/09
08/06/09
"This is the case of the accidental rape
08/06/09
My original point was that I find the phrase "accidental rape" pretty damn offensive. When someone says "no" to a sexual act and you proceed anyway, well, that's rape. Unless, what? Maybe, she slipped on a banana peel?
08/07/09
I'm just being annoying, it's not that I actually think he deserved it, but I wish people would see the idiocy behind blaming victims for their own rape.
08/07/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
08/06/09
BTW: The station is "stunting" before a format change.
08/06/09
08/06/09
RIP Sam. Hope your paws feel better.