I think the crux of this is when someone with power and a fiduciary responsibility towards another has sex with that other person, it is never "consensual."
No matter what McKenzie might think or say, she could not consent to having sex with her father. These GSA cases seem to be generally brother/sister, and while disturbing (to me at least), at least these people are on a supposedly equal footing. A parent/child relationship is ENTIRELY different.
I knew a guy for awhile, when I was in a somewhat different state of life, that was really quite attracted to his twin sister. The story seriously sound like it was something out of some awful novel, but he was really torn up about it. She had some idea and avoided him, and he went to live with a close-by relative (of his own accord, and switched schools). He was deeply, deeply disturbed by it and couldn't figure out how to deal. I haven't spoken to him in a long time, but I just felt bad for him. He didn't know how to form relationships with people in his family, and really had a tough time connecting with others outside of the family. We talked a lot about incest and what it meant, and he said that he didn't really give a shit who thought incest was "taboo" and who didn't. He felt that there was something wrong with him, societally-imposed or not, that wasn't safe and wasn't right.
The whole thing was very eye-opening for me. I had never considered such a possibility. And to see him struggle through it and try to make sense of why he felt the way he did was confusing, difficult and honestly a little gross at times. He dipped in and out of deep depressions and self-harming episodes, because he could not find a healthy way to deal with his attraction to his sister. I hope he's doing well.
"The sudden flood of love is overwhelming, and not having learned what to do with that love in it [sic] proper context, the tendency to sexualize it arises."
this makes sense to me, and i don't find it offensive that birth parents who contact their adopted children are informed about it. being informed about that possible confusion would probably lessen its occurrence.
Aside from the inherent disparity in power present between father-daughter or mother-son relationships, I'm sort of objectively wondering where the line should be drawn. In some cultures it's perfectly normal to marry first cousins; in the U.S., we find it repulsive. There doesn't seem to be very good evidence that one generation of children born to related parents are going to turn out with a lot of health defects. So if I think about it from afar, removing the "rape" and "power" elements, part of me just wonders - if first cousins are okay for some people, where IS the line? Why is that less disgusting than being with your brother? Or why is it more disgusting than being with a second cousin? It seems like these rules are fairly arbitrary.
Coming from a "broken family," I've often wondered how far the lines of my family extend - is my step-brother's half sister my family? His grandma? I think sometimes the boundaries of families are created mostly in our heads.
And let me just say that I'm not condoning or judging incest either way.
I felt from the first time I heard this story that the relationship was merely a manifestation of Mackenzie's fear of losing her father. After all the information, it seems that she viewed him as an overtly charismatic man, who literally went from woman to woman, leaving a string of kids behind. I can imagine under the duress of dysfunction and drug addiction, that in her mind, the way to keep him around was to create an intimate relationship with him. This is not to say she initiated anything, he most certainly did. But I can see how in her mind this was a viable option. And now I will burn my brain.
I'm with all of you who have trouble even dating someone who has the same name as a family member, but I had 2 incidents that were both tied to my half-brother (5 years younger than I).
Loved Lance Bass - thought he was totally the sexiest in the boy bands. Then I saw my brother again after 5 years - twins I tell you.
Then I saw "P.S. I Love You" and was totally in love with the guy with the Irish accent.
Strangely enough it was not Gerard Butler, but Jeffery Dean Morgan. I went on and on about how hot and sexy this guy was.
Then it hit me - my bother's name is only 3 letters in the middle name different from the actor. I was so embarrassed that I had not noticed it! My husband was all, "I wondered when you were going to pick up on the fact that he has the exact same name as your brother."
I feel odd that I still find both Lance Bass and JDM sexy to a point. Is that weird?
@beetlemier: When I first started dating my husband, every family member/friend of his I was introduced to would stare at me and say "She looks exactly like [his recently deceased sister]". So yeah. That is weird. For a long time I felt like he was trying to replace her, and worse, in a romantic relationship...
But 14 years later we're still together, and it is not too weird, I don't think - most people end up with people similar to their mother/father, either physically or in behavior, so the fact that it is sibling for you and him doesn't make it weirder.
@Jan74: That had to be very difficult to go through. I can't believe that people would say that to you! OK, I guess I can, people are assholes.
Congrats on getting through it and making it 14 years (we're at 10).
The point you make about people ending up with someone like their father or mother and a sibling being no different is very perceptive and something I never thought of. My brother's younger than I but has always been taller and "the protector". I much rather prefer to see the resemblance in those terms rather than some weird "call the doctor or maybe the police" way.
The incest taboo is one of the (if not THE) taboos, in relation to brother-sister incest, but I can't help but see incredibly Freudian implications in a sexual relationship between a parent and child.
@Dauphine: Apparently Mr. Phillips' civilization was not quite as discontented as Freud, or we, might've liked...
I know this has been said before many, many times at Jez in regard to this case (I said it before myself), but the inherent power dynamic between a parent and child distinguishes it in immeasurably significant ways from sibling incest. And I just can't get morally relative enough to give it a pass, ever.
I think the point is the sexual feelings arise because of a search for a bond that you feel should exist, but doesn't b/c there isn't a history there. It isn't because they're actually attracted to one another sexually, but because they're trying to create a bond.
Edit: I studied Philosophy in undergrad and Public Policy currently for grad school. Don't really know what I'm talking about. Just thought I'd throw out that disclaimer.
@mfnher: I also think that people who weren't raised with the love and support of a "normal" family context interpret their feelings as something they are more familiar with - sexual desire.
Interestingly enough, I was just reading an article on the incest taboo, "The Incest Taboo and the Mating Patterns of Animals" by David Aberle (and other contributors) - highly illuminating if you have the time to read it.
He explains the various theories as to why incest taboos are universal, particularly focusing on the genetic reasons why humans would avoid incest (detrimental mutations) and how exogamy is advantageous (forming bonds/alliances with other groups) and so the taboo is a way to avoid the genetic mutations and reinforce social ties between a family and the greater human community.
@Blank-Blank: Also, just to clarify, what happened to Mackenzie Phillips is terrible and I don't see how anyone could say incest isn't wrong.
Just thought the anthro article would be an interesting read.
John's awful parenting and Mackenzie's feral upbringing almost certainly were factors in their sexual relationship. But I have a strong suspicion that John was holding her drug supply over her head to coerce compliance. He was part of a drug ring that procured and distributed pharmaceutical-grade drugs. He had the best drugs in his social circle, and bragged about it. Worse yet, he wrote in his autobiography how he used his supply to manipulate his son, who'd feel compelled to act as his dad directed, since he was also an addict and would do anything to score.
If he'd use drugs to manipulate his son, it's no stretch to assume he'd be just as willing to manipulate his daughter in a similar fashion - just with different objectives. Well, for all we know different objectives...
I mentioned this on a Polanski post a few days ago, but all of this recent news (RP, the Hofsra case, this revelation) bring to a head some very interesting viewpoints about consent.
To be clear, I believe that Polanski is guilty of raping a child.
However, it's just really fascinating to see how people's reactions shift and are heightened by extenuating circumstances, time and context. For example, talking about the power dynamics of a father and daughter could very well tie into talking about a power dynamic of a 5 men/1 woman sexual encounter. Power is a huge part of sex. Ditto with intoxication and how it impacts consent.
This isn't any kind of judgment, on anyone, I've just found it very interesting to read everyone's thoughts.
@cirocco: To be fair, I see at least one typo in the jez article and am not using that to question Anna's intelligence. It's a quote from a message board, come on!
One of my best friends is getting her MA in Psych right now, and she was telling me about a thought experiment they did in school:
If a brother and a sister decide to experiment sexually, and they're both comfortable with it and each other (i.e. neither was coerced) and they don't have a child but do have intercourse, is that wrong?
Evidently like 90+% of students will argue yes, but (the teacher's point was, I think) that no one can really offer a reason besides "it's just wrong!"
I mean, I think it would be psychologically traumatic in some way, and I think it's probably unwise to entangle your familial relationships with sex that way, but what do I know. Maybe I'm being judgy-McJudgerson.
@sequined: I feel like you could argue that unless you could change society then there would be problems. The person would have to feel isolated with this huge secret and have to constantly worry about people finding out. It seems like it would be a lot of stress on someone. And I'm sure there would have to be shame on some level.
ampersandparade promoted this comment
Edited by Lizard in the Wires - synthesizer signals suspense! at 09/29/09 6:35 PM
Lizard in the Wires - synthesizer signals suspense! was starred
Lizard in the Wires - synthesizer signals suspense! was unstarred
@sequined: Part of this (the "it's just wrong!" sentiment) is because of what form the incest taboo takes in our culture. In other cultures, such experimentation would be perfectly acceptable.
I cannot speak about the ethics or psychological impact of incest between two consenting adults, but the key here is that participants be CONSENTING ADULTS. Mackenzie Phillips was underage, under the influence of drugs and alcohol, and (most imporantly) she was a minor. She was in no position to make a rational choice.
Hiroine Protagonist promoted this comment
Edited by my cousin is an ape at 09/29/09 6:41 PM
my cousin is an ape was starred
my cousin is an ape was unstarred
@Lizard in the Wires is on Rails: Perhaps this is just a taboo at this point. With interracial and homosexual relationships now in the mainstream, perhaps familial relationships where there is no offspring are the remaining taboo. My own feelings are conflicted; I don't think having sex with a genetic relative is in any way as "okay" as someone of the same sex or a differing race, nor should that struggle be equated with that. But if there aren't any consequences... I don't know.
I do know that I like having to reconsider my opnions of things in an intellectual way, so I appreciate that others on Jezebel also would be considering things at that level of thought.
@sequined: The ick factor aside, it is a very bad idea. It would make holidays even more hellish by having to sit across from your ex and ask them to pass the mashed potatoes. Family events can be stressful enough, who needs that aggravation?
@ampersandparade: You do raise a good point about the taboo. There was a large Hmong population in the area where I grew up, and they have clan names and everyone within your clan was considered family and sex with them would be incest regardless of if you were actually biologically related or not.
I guess my stance on it is that people are going to do what people are going to do. It's really none of my business what goes on in their bedrooms. I may find it gross, but as long as they keep it to themselves and are consenting adults, they're welcome to do what they like.
@ampersandparade: I can see why you would draw a connection to other kinds of relationships that were taboo in previous eras, but that connection seems pretty ... offensive (which I see you acknowledge).
However, it does make me stop for a moment and wonder if my attitude toward incest today is similar to attitudes about, say, interracial relationships 150 years ago. And in 150 years, will it be "OK" to have an incestuous relationship? WOW. That's a bit of a mindf-ck. It does seem plausible as sexual relationships grow increasingly culturally divided from reproduction.
@Ultraprison!: The Secret Santa thought is terrifying. If your ex is really mean spirited you could end up with a "I WAS with stupid" tee-shirt as a gift.
@MizJenkins: "The offspring bear the consequences (genetically)." This is not necessarily true. A one-time mating between close relatives is not going to automatically produce a mutant. The likelihood of recessive genes causing defects rises higher with prolonged inbreeding over generations. Even then, it's similar to the problems encountered by ANY small, isolated population - are we going to start persecuting the Amish by claiming they are selfishly producing hopelessly deformed offspring? Genetic reasons are not sufficient explanation or rationalization for the incest taboo.
09/30/09
No matter what McKenzie might think or say, she could not consent to having sex with her father. These GSA cases seem to be generally brother/sister, and while disturbing (to me at least), at least these people are on a supposedly equal footing. A parent/child relationship is ENTIRELY different.
09/30/09
09/30/09
10/01/09
09/30/09
The whole thing was very eye-opening for me. I had never considered such a possibility. And to see him struggle through it and try to make sense of why he felt the way he did was confusing, difficult and honestly a little gross at times. He dipped in and out of deep depressions and self-harming episodes, because he could not find a healthy way to deal with his attraction to his sister. I hope he's doing well.
09/29/09
this makes sense to me, and i don't find it offensive that birth parents who contact their adopted children are informed about it. being informed about that possible confusion would probably lessen its occurrence.
09/29/09
Coming from a "broken family," I've often wondered how far the lines of my family extend - is my step-brother's half sister my family? His grandma? I think sometimes the boundaries of families are created mostly in our heads.
And let me just say that I'm not condoning or judging incest either way.
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
Loved Lance Bass - thought he was totally the sexiest in the boy bands. Then I saw my brother again after 5 years - twins I tell you.
Then I saw "P.S. I Love You" and was totally in love with the guy with the Irish accent.
Strangely enough it was not Gerard Butler, but Jeffery Dean Morgan. I went on and on about how hot and sexy this guy was.
Then it hit me - my bother's name is only 3 letters in the middle name different from the actor. I was so embarrassed that I had not noticed it! My husband was all, "I wondered when you were going to pick up on the fact that he has the exact same name as your brother."
I feel odd that I still find both Lance Bass and JDM sexy to a point. Is that weird?
10/01/09
But 14 years later we're still together, and it is not too weird, I don't think - most people end up with people similar to their mother/father, either physically or in behavior, so the fact that it is sibling for you and him doesn't make it weirder.
10/01/09
Congrats on getting through it and making it 14 years (we're at 10).
The point you make about people ending up with someone like their father or mother and a sibling being no different is very perceptive and something I never thought of. My brother's younger than I but has always been taller and "the protector". I much rather prefer to see the resemblance in those terms rather than some weird "call the doctor or maybe the police" way.
09/29/09
The incest taboo is one of the (if not THE) taboos, in relation to brother-sister incest, but I can't help but see incredibly Freudian implications in a sexual relationship between a parent and child.
09/29/09
I know this has been said before many, many times at Jez in regard to this case (I said it before myself), but the inherent power dynamic between a parent and child distinguishes it in immeasurably significant ways from sibling incest. And I just can't get morally relative enough to give it a pass, ever.
09/29/09
Edit: I studied Philosophy in undergrad and Public Policy currently for grad school. Don't really know what I'm talking about. Just thought I'd throw out that disclaimer.
09/29/09
09/29/09
He explains the various theories as to why incest taboos are universal, particularly focusing on the genetic reasons why humans would avoid incest (detrimental mutations) and how exogamy is advantageous (forming bonds/alliances with other groups) and so the taboo is a way to avoid the genetic mutations and reinforce social ties between a family and the greater human community.
09/29/09
Just thought the anthro article would be an interesting read.
09/29/09
If he'd use drugs to manipulate his son, it's no stretch to assume he'd be just as willing to manipulate his daughter in a similar fashion - just with different objectives. Well, for all we know different objectives...
09/29/09
To be clear, I believe that Polanski is guilty of raping a child.
However, it's just really fascinating to see how people's reactions shift and are heightened by extenuating circumstances, time and context. For example, talking about the power dynamics of a father and daughter could very well tie into talking about a power dynamic of a 5 men/1 woman sexual encounter. Power is a huge part of sex. Ditto with intoxication and how it impacts consent.
This isn't any kind of judgment, on anyone, I've just found it very interesting to read everyone's thoughts.
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/30/09
09/29/09
If a brother and a sister decide to experiment sexually, and they're both comfortable with it and each other (i.e. neither was coerced) and they don't have a child but do have intercourse, is that wrong?
Evidently like 90+% of students will argue yes, but (the teacher's point was, I think) that no one can really offer a reason besides "it's just wrong!"
I mean, I think it would be psychologically traumatic in some way, and I think it's probably unwise to entangle your familial relationships with sex that way, but what do I know. Maybe I'm being judgy-McJudgerson.
09/29/09
09/29/09
I cannot speak about the ethics or psychological impact of incest between two consenting adults, but the key here is that participants be CONSENTING ADULTS. Mackenzie Phillips was underage, under the influence of drugs and alcohol, and (most imporantly) she was a minor. She was in no position to make a rational choice.
09/29/09
I do know that I like having to reconsider my opnions of things in an intellectual way, so I appreciate that others on Jezebel also would be considering things at that level of thought.
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
I guess my stance on it is that people are going to do what people are going to do. It's really none of my business what goes on in their bedrooms. I may find it gross, but as long as they keep it to themselves and are consenting adults, they're welcome to do what they like.
09/29/09
However, it does make me stop for a moment and wonder if my attitude toward incest today is similar to attitudes about, say, interracial relationships 150 years ago. And in 150 years, will it be "OK" to have an incestuous relationship? WOW. That's a bit of a mindf-ck. It does seem plausible as sexual relationships grow increasingly culturally divided from reproduction.
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/30/09