@AmericanSplendor: A sign of true maturity when a nerd embraces one's nerdom and realizes that it does provide many benefits in life...including being surrounded by other nerds.
@AmericanSplendor: In Tina Brown's defense, ironic detachment is extremely difficult, it's quickly mastering statistics on African girls' literacy rates and tying those to broad, effective strategies that's so damn easy.
@AmericanSplendor: I went to policy school and law school. I'm like a double wonk nerd. But you know something? Our President is a nerd and a wonk too and he's pretty damn cool.
I think it can be very difficult to compliment women on their success. I don't think that our language--culture?--has the vocabulary to compliment women on anything that isn't coded feminine.
You know how there's that whole thing where women are "sluts" but men are "studs," or men are "assertive CEOs" and women are "bitches"? It's like, even if you called a woman an "assertive CEO" it would still kind of come across as "bitch" to most readers. So people try to constantly undercut compliments by also bringing up her "femininity," which is necessarily subordinated, submissive, or conciliatory. I think when women want to say that Clinton's doing a good job, they have trouble articulating it in a way that they feel does not come across as implying "bitch" or "castrating man-hater." Their solution to that is to counter each compliment with what is essentially an insult, as this post so clearly lays out.
It isn't impossible--Jezebel writers do it every day. But Jezebel's staff also isn't afraid to openly be feminist or even confrontational (also, are good writers). It's sad that average journalists aren't good enough at writing to manage to get around our culture's prohibition on complimenting women's success and intelligence, and it's sad that they also feel like they have to temper any attempt at compliments. They are not only playing into the social trope of women's subordinate position, they're enforcing the structure of our language that codes things like "powerful," "assertive," "intelligent," and "competent" as masculine, and therefore vaguely insulting to women. Because calling a woman a masculine-coded adjective, even if it's complimentary, can be taken as insulting by some people, because it has masculinity embedded in its meaning.
@Cimorene: I don't think its a problem with the language, the words are there. Assertive, non-gendered, is a positive. If it makes one think of maleness, its probably because men are socialized to be assertive.
And I completely disagree that intelligent or competent are gendered words. My mother has been running her own newsroom for twenty years, and people never shy away from calling her intelligent or competent. Powerful, assertive, yes; intelligent, no.
Bill Clinton is the guy you invite over for dinner and everyone has a great time but then he tries to fondle your wife. And then he cries. And then you both tell him it's ok but he really needs to leave but by then he's asleep on your sectional.
The next morning he makes everyone blueberry pancakes and you eat them in the breakfast nook while listening to NPR.
The next time he sees you at a party he pretends to not know you; he actually has forgotten you but thinks you're that guy from his publisher's office who calls him "Mr President" and winks at him in the elevator.
Bish plz. I don't even know what I would say to someone who accused me of hugging them too long. Like, did you have your official hugging stopwatch out?
Jaded (former) Washingtonian here. Whenever people get excited (in a good or bad way) about a pol, my reaction is always "eh". At the federal level (no doubt, other levels too, as some have recently demonstrated) they're all boorish egomaniacs. I only care about whether they push legislation of which I approve.
So when Sarah Palin says the same thing, she's a flaming psycho? I think we should nix this whole crybaby idea that someone, somewhere is against an idea that a politician has. Like, boo hoo, someone doesn't like me! It makes my job difficult!
You're all grownups. You all know the game. You wanted to be there. Now own it. And shut up.
@deeemer: Oh, for fuck's sake already. Have you been in a box for the past, say, fifteen years? Faux News, the rise of the Religious Right, the all-too-recent domination of the US government by the Repubs....The whole, "Both parties are just as bad," is just ridiculous in this day and age, especially after the terrorism thrown at abortion rights supporters.
Can someone please tell me where this mythical "liberal media" exists that Republicans always refer to? Conservatives own the media. It's frightening how they have been able to leverage this power to set the media agenda and drown out the voice of the majority.
I agree, I remember watching a documentary about the Clintons a few years back and just being horrified by the behavior of the GOP. Granted, documentaries are generally biased. I do believe that there is an ingrained fear among conservative movers and shakers (not necessarily their constituents) that the liberal agenda is, in fact, more beneficial to Americans at large, and they are hell-bent on doing anything they can to prevent positive movement in many areas. They fear losing power, they fear the loss of the status quo. They're scared. And, they should be. It's just sad that they are so damn manipulative.
I've said it before, but all of this stoking of pretty open, violent anti-government folks has fed into this spate of violence against the government. The death of that census worker should be a seriously lesson that this sort of terrorist activity needs to be followed up on. I fear what will happen if it continues to escalate.
@Trulymadlyme: It's pretty awful, isn't it? This seems to be the culmination of eight years' worth of paranoia-encouraging, fearmongering, and pro-violence advocacy on the part of the Bush administration and its supporters. And I honestly don't know whether to be angry at how people are allowed to exercise their hate so freely and openly, or to be scared.
@Trulymadlyme: It's important to get people to actually acknowledge that type of activity as terrorist activity. Looking at it as anything but only dilutes it. It seems as if it's just giving the violent anti-government crowd the go-ahead to continue dangerous behavior under the pretense of exercising their rights and freedoms. Nobody is saying they have to agree with everything the government does, but the threats and the outright violence have to stop because neither will accomplish anything.
@Trulymadlyme: So true. The libertarian-conservative fantasy lacks compassion and a simple realization that massive economic imbalance destabilizes the country and threatens the real future. Time has come to reinvest in the American workforce and the economy to profit from their labor, not their debt.
@Andalucía: You and me both. Remember how people said, "Musta been a Moozlim who done it?" And then it turned out to be a Turner Diaries -reading, right wing, ex soldier white Tim McVeigh.
@Ginmar Rienne: Also, turned out the anthrax scare was also caused by some christian fanatic, who worked for the Government too (in research). But yeah, it's muslims you have to be scared of...
Wasn't that one of the taglines for David Brock's book Blinded By the Right, that he knew there *was* a vast right-wing conspiracy, because he had been part of it?
@redqueenmeg: I'm pretty sure it was. I don't like the word conspiracy, b/c I definitely think there is an organized effort that is not hidden or covert that is trying by all means to destroy any change this president wants to bring about. Doesn't matter what kind of change, really, because the principle is that he's 'bad', 'wrong', 'socialist', 'fascist', whatever.
@Hippopotame: Yeah, saying "conspiracy" makes it seem like you have to be wearing a tinfoil hat to believe in it, and something like this that's so apparent really isn't that way at all.
10/13/09
Nerd secret: the people calling you a nerd/wonk in a bad way are probably dumber than you.
10/13/09
10/13/09
10/13/09
10/13/09
10/13/09
YES, CALCULATORS CAN BE SEXAY.
10/13/09
You know how there's that whole thing where women are "sluts" but men are "studs," or men are "assertive CEOs" and women are "bitches"? It's like, even if you called a woman an "assertive CEO" it would still kind of come across as "bitch" to most readers. So people try to constantly undercut compliments by also bringing up her "femininity," which is necessarily subordinated, submissive, or conciliatory. I think when women want to say that Clinton's doing a good job, they have trouble articulating it in a way that they feel does not come across as implying "bitch" or "castrating man-hater." Their solution to that is to counter each compliment with what is essentially an insult, as this post so clearly lays out.
It isn't impossible--Jezebel writers do it every day. But Jezebel's staff also isn't afraid to openly be feminist or even confrontational (also, are good writers). It's sad that average journalists aren't good enough at writing to manage to get around our culture's prohibition on complimenting women's success and intelligence, and it's sad that they also feel like they have to temper any attempt at compliments. They are not only playing into the social trope of women's subordinate position, they're enforcing the structure of our language that codes things like "powerful," "assertive," "intelligent," and "competent" as masculine, and therefore vaguely insulting to women. Because calling a woman a masculine-coded adjective, even if it's complimentary, can be taken as insulting by some people, because it has masculinity embedded in its meaning.
10/13/09
And I completely disagree that intelligent or competent are gendered words. My mother has been running her own newsroom for twenty years, and people never shy away from calling her intelligent or competent. Powerful, assertive, yes; intelligent, no.
09/29/09
The next morning he makes everyone blueberry pancakes and you eat them in the breakfast nook while listening to NPR.
The next time he sees you at a party he pretends to not know you; he actually has forgotten you but thinks you're that guy from his publisher's office who calls him "Mr President" and winks at him in the elevator.
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
Now assfucking is a horse of another color.
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/29/09
09/28/09
09/27/09
You're all grownups. You all know the game. You wanted to be there. Now own it. And shut up.
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/28/09
09/27/09
09/28/09
Really? You've been watching the wrong documentaries.
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/28/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09
09/27/09