True confessions: I have actually worn the mary-kateandashley makeup. They made a really kick ass gold metallic eye shadow pencil that I used to rock in high school. #zoekravitz
@Zombie Ms. Skittles: I still have a couple of their eyeshadows. I've had them for years and should probably toss them, but now it's like they're a relic or something ... #zoekravitz
@Zombie Ms. Skittles: I have too! I bought a bunch of it at once, like 5 years ago, because they had things packaged together and then they were buy one get one free, and they were cheap. It was good makeup, especially the lip gloss. I used everything until they were done and I still have the dark brown eyeliner.
It is a little embarrassing. One of my friends peeked in my makeup bag and was like "I didn't know you were a Mary Kate and Ashley fan" #zoekravitz
I have very strong opinions about Eileen Fisher. I worked in a boutique that sold her things when I was in college and, regardless of the "image" she's going for (fuck, it's fashion), she IS a godsend to a lot of women. If you can sell a cute pair of linen drawstring pants in XS to a 19 year old like me and dress a size 22 who is 50 and a professional, you're doing something right.
Fisher's ads feature a pretty wide range of women (ages, races and yes, sizes). She doesn't need to target the plus-size market because they already flock to her.
Also, Rosie bugs me. Does Donna Karan go for a plus size image? No. #ragtrade
@Penny: It's not my kind of style, but Eileen Fisher clothing seems to be very well made. Many of the brands catering to plus sizes seem to be very cheaply made.
If I go to a higher end department store and look at plus sizes, the style is very dowdy and matronly. There are young, plus size women who have the money to buy nice things.
@Penny: I agree about the designs -- I actually love some of Eileen Fisher's pieces. (Most of them I stole from my mum, but you know.)
However, it is true the company is consciously chasing a younger "hipper" customer -- they certainly collaborated with a Times article stating same -- and that strikes me as foolish.
And if Fisher herself said what O'Donnell reports, to her very face, that is just downright mean.
@Jenna: I agree. I'm not one to ditch good design willy nilly, but Fisher's rudeness to a happy, loyal customer tells me I shouldn't express any more gratitude to Eileen Fisher with my hard-earned money because clearly my fat behind insults her business.
Famous person talking about and wearing your clothes = great advertising. Famous person telling fans how rude and ungrateful clothing designer is = bad advertising. That's how social media works, lady. #zoekravitz
@Penny: "...And then, he's gonna make her Lady Wintour, Viscountess of 4 Times Square, and Marchioness of the Leaping Brazilians, and he'll take her as his vassal for Long Island, and then they'll all eat pizza and cupcakes." #zoekravitz
I was reading through the UK Vogue with Georgia May on the cover last night. It's literally the first time I have flipped through a magazine and felt frightfully old. #ragtrade
I really hope they got permission of some sort of somehow legally won't get into trouble. disney once shut down a 3rd grad play in queens because of legal issues (copyright or something)
@schoolofloverboy: Since her face isn't showing, they can probably get away with it. What Disney has is a right to their very particular version of Snow White, not any Snow White ever. Without the face, they can get away with it.
I just showed this to a friend. He was like "I don't get it." I was like "It's a visual pun." He was like "I still don't get it." I was like "It's a feminist and subversive visual pun." He was like "Oh, so that's why you think it's awesome."
@Zombie Ms. Skittles: Well, if it's a poisoned apple, then the gloves and face mask mean she's handling it with care. And since it's "glowing" it could also be read as a kind of bomb.
It could be a subversive look at the way Apple has taken over parts of the tech market (and it's tie in with Disney, for that matter). A play on the poisoned apple theme.
Or it could be a take on Snow White's victim status where she's taking that poisoned apple and handling it differently this time around. Ie. using it as a weapon against others instead of eating it. The apple in Snow White symbolizes her loss of choice and victimization...and also her "happy ending" which is being saved by the handsome prince. This would be subverting that.
@casi nadie (loves MCC forever): I'm interpreting it as feminist because she's 1) dressed in an outfit of power, when she is entirely passive in the myth and 2) appearing to exercise control over the apple, which was the weapon that had harmed her.
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/07/09
It is a little embarrassing. One of my friends peeked in my makeup bag and was like "I didn't know you were a Mary Kate and Ashley fan" #zoekravitz
11/06/09
Fisher's ads feature a pretty wide range of women (ages, races and yes, sizes). She doesn't need to target the plus-size market because they already flock to her.
Also, Rosie bugs me. Does Donna Karan go for a plus size image? No. #ragtrade
11/06/09
If I go to a higher end department store and look at plus sizes, the style is very dowdy and matronly. There are young, plus size women who have the money to buy nice things.
11/06/09
However, it is true the company is consciously chasing a younger "hipper" customer -- they certainly collaborated with a Times article stating same -- and that strikes me as foolish.
And if Fisher herself said what O'Donnell reports, to her very face, that is just downright mean.
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
Famous person talking about and wearing your clothes = great advertising. Famous person telling fans how rude and ungrateful clothing designer is = bad advertising. That's how social media works, lady. #zoekravitz
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
I didn't know the President was able to do this. Are we in England? #ragtrade
11/06/09
11/06/09
09/08/09
My favorite is still this:
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
But why does she have to steal it? It was always ours for the taking. :)
Does that mean women had to steal knowledge? I don't like that implication... but maybe I'm misinterpreting.
09/08/09
09/08/09
I don't get the Snow White as hoodlum part. I guess it's trying to put her in the offering role, rather than receiving?
09/08/09
I guess it's self-aware and ironic.
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
Is it feminist because the Queen/Wicked Witch was a man? I'm still confused.
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
It could be a subversive look at the way Apple has taken over parts of the tech market (and it's tie in with Disney, for that matter). A play on the poisoned apple theme.
Or it could be a take on Snow White's victim status where she's taking that poisoned apple and handling it differently this time around. Ie. using it as a weapon against others instead of eating it. The apple in Snow White symbolizes her loss of choice and victimization...and also her "happy ending" which is being saved by the handsome prince. This would be subverting that.
09/08/09
09/08/09
And that's coming from someone who hates Snow White.