In 4th grade, all the kids started to realize that some of the kids were different from one another. Some weren't very tan, they were African American, which was different from being white. Some were Jewish and that meant more than 6 days of presents instead of 1. ... and, actually, that concludes the racial makeup of my suburb in the 80s. Anyway.
Some little girls -- a pair of Jewish girls and a black girl -- started going at each other. It reached a fever pitch when Certain Words were thrown about in a very frightening Lord of the Flies playground race riot.
Our principal, the gentle post-hippie Dr. Milgrim, took those three girls into her office and talked to them, and made them talk to each other. for like an hour. When other names came up -- deputies and witnesses -- those girls were called in, too. Concessions were made. Apologies were given. Dr. Milgrim taught us the term "we don't have to like each other but we do have to get along at school." The woman was goddamn Dumbledore except she did her job.
The bullying stopped. Race and religion stopped being interesting. the girls grew up rather nice and friendly, tho not with each other. It worked because Dr. Milgrim didn't treat us like a bunch of little girls, she asked us our problems and taught us how to work through them, like adults. Stopping bullying can work, but administrators have to get to the root of the problem and they have to LISTEN. Children's world is not your world. It is an alien place and for a grownup to come in and settle things, he can't stick a bandaid on a problem with some rhetoric. There are no bullies, there's just relationships. Some are good, some are bad.
@BytheSea: I agree with this except for the alien idea. I think you contradicted yourself there and it's important to point out. We treat children like their problems do not matter, like their hurts and pleasures are small - and in many ways that is true; our perspective is usually broader. However, a child's world is a microcosm of our own. It isn't alien, it's simply a smaller version. Stereotypes that exist in the real world are reenacted in theirs. To suggest that they came up with these biases independently is to let ourselves off the hook.
Your principal knew this and treated these children like people. Perhaps their problems are small, but that doesn't mean they aren't important. And better to resolve small problems now than be unable to solve big ones later on in life.
Final note, it is vitally important to listen and respect a child's pain. After all, it may be small to us, but it is very big to them. And the girl in the article is the tragic evidence of that fact.
I was a special education teacher for eight years, and I tried to fight bullying as much as my job would allow. Kids are slick, and kids are mean - so many of the horrible things the kids did to each other were under my radar. When we could suss out who the bullies were, it was rare when any consequence we could give them had any effect on the behavior. Young bullies, who still have a few shreds of empathy, compassion and the ability to freely put themselves in others' shoes, are more likely to change than older bullies. I also think bullies breed bullies. Nine times out of ten, a bully's parents were just as mean spirited as their child.
I know I sound cynical, which is why I got out of the game when I did. Childhood is like a giant internet flame war with standardized tests.
Did bullying cause this girl's disorder? I don't know, but it certainly didn't help.
1) It's one thing to say, "ok, let's teach our kids not to be bullies in school," it's entirely another thing to find the time and money to do that. I'm not a teacher, so any Jezzies on this board that ARE teachers, please correct me. Aren't you busy trying to teach the students all the stuff they're going to need for the test? When are you supposed to fit in lectures or classes on bullying?
2) Bullies are jerks, yes. They do horrible things, yes. But there is something to be learned from bullies: they are everywhere, and they don't end at school. There are bullies everywhere in life. Even if you made it through school without being bullied, somewhere, someone eventually will bully you. Some people are just jerks. It's a good thing to learn. Jerk Idenification, Jerk Avoidance, and How to Not Be a Jerk are important things to learn. But jerks will never go away altogether. To some extents, your kid has to learn to deal with it eventually.
@waverly:
1. Yes. And part of school is learning social skills along with math and reading and science. They are not mutually exclusive. The fact that bullying goes on in classrooms says that A. overcrowding is an issue and B. it's allowing destructive behavior to go unchecked.
2. ::sigh:: There are a lot of threads addressing this, but you can learn lots of life lessons about how tough it is in the "real" world without bullying. If people physically threaten or harm you as an adult, they can be charged with assault. There are consequences in the adult world for bullying behavior (like harassment laws, sexual and otherwise). And yet we seem completely comfortable with not addressing these behaviors when people are younger and at their most susceptible to learning consequences.
The burden of dealing with bullying seems to be laid entirely at the feet of those victimized by it, and that seems troubling to me. Why aren't those who perpetuate this behavior held accountable, or even expected to be held accountable?
Kids who are bullied and don't have it addressed don't learn that sometimes people are jerks. They learn that abuse is okay, and tolerated, and something they have to put up with. That's not the same lesson. Because you do have ways to address it as an adult. Another adult can't just harass you on a daily basis, or hit you, or call you names in the work place.
Plus, there are levels of bullying. It sucks to be called a name a few times, but it's not the same as systematic abuse. Like being targeted, physically assaulted, sexually harassed, or verbally assaulted on a daily basis. I don't know anyone who would come out of that unscathed and there's no reason not to deal with it, or to just shrug our shoulders and say "oh, well, sometimes people suck". That's how you end up teaching kids that it's okay to abuse other people.
@tiredfairy: I take your point. I certainly would NOT put up with being smacked or pinched or beat up or sworn at work. Again, agree with you that certain behavior is assault. But I have put up with people being jerks to me verbally at work, because I've found that there are jerks at every job. I can't just quit my job every single time someone is a jerk to me, because I gotta eat and pay my mortgage. At some point, I've come to terms with the fact that life is not perfect, and even though many or most people are "socialized to be nice" the lessons our parents teach us don't always carry all the way through to adulthood. Even if they should.
@tiredfairy: Another point of rebuttal: classrooms are over-crowded, yes. But even in the teeniest, tiniest schools (I went to one) and in classes with 10 kids -- there are still bullies. Class size may be a contributing factor, but even if, in a perfect world, every kid was in a small class, some kids would still be bullies.
@waverly: Whether people are always nice is somewhat different than bullying, though. Jerky behavior isn't quite the same. Some people are terse or cranky or easily irritated. Some people don't handle stress well, or just aren't particularly nice. Not awesome behaviors, but hardly bullying.
Bullying is aggressively targeting someone, and then repetitively verbally or physically intimidating/insulting/assaulting them. It's quite different than someone who just isn't very nice. It's a systematic way of tearing someone down, consistently. Though someone can be bullied once, or multiple times, I'd say it's rarely a one-time occurrence.
Lots of kids learn that life isn't perfect but aren't subjected to daily bullying. I think we're looking at this like, if kids don't get a lot of hard knocks, they won't get "tough". i think kids get plenty of hard knocks just by virtue of being a kid. And bullying will happen. But we can do a lot to prevent it.
I mean, unless they're taught otherwise, bullies as children grown up to be adult bullies. And they're generally the ones I see starting fights, or abusing partners. It's a bad cycle.
I was tortured (I hate 'teased' -- teased suggests playfulness, and there is none of that in bullying) throughout school for being fat.
I'm still fat, but I have issues with food, like not liking to eat in front of people. I am fat, and therefore do not deserve food.
I also went on a self-designed diet in high school where I would eat nothing but Dexatrim -- the OLD Dexatrim -- during the day and only eat dinner at night.
And all those teachers and guidence counselers said -- oh, it's just what kids do. You need to toughen up.
One of my most vivid memories is having gotten what I thought was a beautiful red leather jacket in third grade from my grandmother. The class conspired to hide it behind an extremely dusty filing cabinet in the coatroom. And the nun had me stand up in front of the class with her while she told the class they should be ashamed and that I was a good, beautiful girl.
What I want to know is why no schools have aggressive anti-bullying programs. I mean, if they're going to teach stuff like DARE, why not Anti-Bullying? How hard is it to train kids to say "That's not cool" in 101 different phrases to a bully? If you do it at a young enough age, they'll never develop that paralyzing fear of social reprisal.
Having been bullied, I am astounded at how simple it is to get them to back down now, and I really wish I'd known more about it at the time.
@paradisefound25: My school had a very aggressive programme, which sort of began and ended when a party got WAY out of hand and a girl who had formerly been a sort of underhand bully (the kind teachers definitely suspected and hated, but nothing overt enough to punish) went seriously overboard. She went around boasting that she had beaten up another girl, which she definitely hadn't done, and it really backfired on her. The scariest teacher in the school put us in a circle, looked right at this girl and said 'Don't bully. I will find out, and I will fucking kill you.' It worked--she believed him, because we all really respected/feared him. And it empowered the class to reject her weird class-queen status. After a while she felt so ignored and out of the loop that she just left the school.
Having been bullied myself, I honestly don't think teaching empathy and niceness to a bunch of 15 year olds does anything. 15 year olds can be vicious bastards, which is why I also reject the concept that bullying of that kind happens in the 'real world' so you should just suck it up. Nothing is as awful as high school, not least because when you're that age you feel everything so much more acutely. But the benefit of a school environment is that there are authorities who really have the ability to punish bullies, and to get them hard. If bullies really believe they're going to be in serious trouble, it doesn't stop everything, but it sure helps--if only by giving bullied students the confidence to feel like they have the upper hand.
@rah29: So this teacher made an entirely inappropriate threat against this girl and then the rest of the school ostracized her until she left, even though she stopped the bullying behavior? Nice. Good work. It's one thing to be firm and I understand not wanting to let this girl get away with her shit, but I'm entirely surprised that teacher didn't get fired because most parents would most fucking definitely go bonkers over a teacher threatening to 'fucking kill' their child regardless of the circumstances. That's insane.
@rhymenoceros: Hah, I guess it sounds horrible out of context. Our teachers did swear in front of us once we got into the 'senior' part of the school--different country, different kind of system. Irish people tend to swear a bit more freely than Americans (at least, I've been called out on my language in the States many times). This guy went on to be headhunted by a remedial school for kids who had committed various minor offenses; he was that kind of tough but extremely respected teacher, it was considered a major loss to the school by parents and students. Plus the girl wasn't exactly ostracised, though I can see how it came across that way. It's more that the others who used to be totally terrorised by her presence felt a bit more supported by the school. She still had friends, for sure, and she left at a time when quite a few students tend to leave for academic reasons (fourth year, when lots of people move to 'grind' schools that focus on preparing students for exams, as she did). It wasn't quite as severe as it sounds in writing!
As for the parents, they were very rarely involved in school goings-on, which kind of left it up to teachers. At least when I was in school, it was a culture in which teachers were generally assumed to be in the right (this is changing, thankfully, as we now know how generations of parental non-involvement in schooling enabled priests all over the country to do whatever the hell they wanted with their students). I don't think my parents ever once backed me against a teacher--if I got in trouble they assumed the teacher was right. Even when my principal blatantly hated me, my parents' approach was basically, deal with it.
It is very hard to stop bullying. As nora charles said, there is only so much a school can do. Punishing bullys is a good step but can it effectively stop them? I doubt it.
@mannequin: Shouldn't we try before we conclude that it will probably not help? Educators and administrators usually turn a blind eye, and in doing so, foster an environment that encourages bullying through their tacit acceptance. It is doubly damaging for kids to see that their teachers don't care to help them, even in the classroom and hallways. It emboldens bullies when they see that adults are allowing them to take over.
@Hana Maru: I think it's a mistake to assume that they're not "trying." We don't know that educators usually turn a blind eye, and I personally find it hard to believe given all the fuss about it post-Columbine. They know that their jobs are at risk if they just ignore the bullying, especially if a tragedy ensues. The problem is that there are ten bullies in any school for any one adult, and no serious effective punishments.
Expulsion? The bully goes to another school and finds someone new to pick on.
Suspension? The kid comes back and the bullying resumes.
Mediation, counseling, and anti-bullying programs? Rarely have much of a long-term effect.
Sent to the principal's office? The bully just hides their bullying better the next time.
Also, because a lot of bullying has no evidence, just a he said/she said thing, it's often hard for the schools to do anything at all.
Unfortunately, no matter what the punishment, it doesn't usually address the root causes of bullying. There's only so much that a school can be held accountable for.
@Hana Maru: I would like some actual evidence to back up your notion that most teachers and administrators turn a blind eye to bullying. Contrary to what you apparently think, we don't get to punish kids for perceptions, so if we don't see the bullying because we're not following every kid 24 hours a day, we can't do anything about it. If we do witness it, there is only so much we and then the administration is legally allowed to do about it. Do not even put the blame on teachers and administrators because the hands are tied by politics and the parents of the bully reacting extremely negatively to any punishment doled out to their child.
@nora charles: It's not an assumption, it's an observation, based on 5 schools I attended from K-12, and the experiences of many, many people here. It happened in the case of this girl, where she reported wrongdoing that happened in school, for years, and the school was unwilling to intervene.
And frankly, the root cause of bullying is...bullying. Many child bullies are abused by parents or older siblings, and their victims may find more victims. Administrative inaction emboldens them and speeds the cycle along.
One notorious bully from my middle school was allowed to escalate her behavior, in full view of teachers, until she stabbed another child with a dull pair of scissors. She was suspended and put into counseling sessions afterward. Whether it solved the "root cause" of her behavior or not, she learned that her behavior was not to be tolerated and she cut it out. The school got a little nicer, a little safer. So often, adults deliberately let bullying slide because they simply don't think it's serious, or they think it's good for kids. They would never tolerate the same in their own work environment.
@rhymenoceros: So, you're afraid to act because of "politics" and your fear of what the bullies' parents might do to you? Well I hope this girl's parents win their lawsuit, then, because you might have to respond to that.
@rhymenoceros: also, thanks for backing up my "notion" that adults in charge excuse bullying by first offering your inaccurate idea of bullying as something amorphous and invisible, and then explaining why you excuse bullying at your school.
We don't allow adults to libel, slander, harass, steal from, verbally or physically assault one another. We send people to prison for those things.
Why do so many of us consider this good practice for children, but not for us? You don't stop learning social lessons, stop "toughening up" when you become an adult.
How many of you, who defend bullying as "survival of the fittest" or something bullied kids bring on themselves, would stick it out in a workplace where your colleagues and superiors either bullied you or stood by and watched? How many of you would be grateful for the life lessons it provided?
Even as a former anorexic, I think this sets a really dangerous precedent. You would be hard-pressed to find a kid with an eating disorder who was never bullied about their looks whatsoever. You would be hard-pressed to find any kid who was never bullied about their looks. If it was an adult who was doing the bullying, as in the Megan Meier case, I'd feel less uncomfortable about this . . . but I feel really weird about holding kids accountable for something they only partially contributed to, when their brains aren't fully developed enough to grasp the long-term wounds these kinds of actions can lead to.
I don't think it's usually fair to hold schools responsible for the acts that occur within their halls. Sure, if a gross lapse in attention or judgment occurs, then it's fair. But even when kids are being bullied, there's only so much intervening the school can do. You can't have some adult's eyes on every single victim of bullying every single minute of the day. Kids are sneaky, and eventually the would-be bullies will find some moment or method to act out, even when they are being supervised.
Plus, my gut feeling is that she would have developed the eating disorder anyway. You don't develop an eating disorder because someone tells you you're fat; you develop it as a reaction to the stresses in your life. If she hadn't been bullied, there would have been other types of stress that would have likely sent her down the same road.
@nora charles: Except that, from what I understand, schools are required by law to provide a safe space for learning. They're also "in loco parentis" which is supposed to mean they act as parents during the course of the school day.
I was bullied in full view of teachers for 2 years of my life. I was verbally and physically abused...I was sexually harassed, spit on, groped. On a daily basis. In every class. My teachers did nothing. My parents did nothing. The school did nothing, even when they were told, even when it was right in front of them.
I developed anxiety and depression, and years later, an ED. Largely because people had told me I was fat, every day. That I was fat and disgusting and worthless. That was a huge contributor to how I viewed myself, and why I though starvation might "solve" that problem. I don't blame my ED on anyone, but at the same time, the actions of others contributed to the problem.
The school, just like the bullies, are responsible for their actions and inactions. If I'm responsible for my reaction to it, why aren't they for putting me in that position? If they aren't, who is? How are the bullies not responsible for what they chose to say and do? How is the school not responsible for not stepping in?
I'm not trying to attack you, I know what you mean. But we don't know why each person develops an ED. Some people develop them from sexual abuse, others from not wanting to develop sexually, some from family control issues, others from social pressure etc. We don't know if she would have developed an ED anyway, and that's not really a good excuse for the school not to be held accountable for doing nothing in this situation.
If a grown up were being sexually harassed in the workplace, we'd expect the law to do something about it. Why don't we expect schools and teachers and parents?
In this case, the bullies aren't being held accountable. The school is. I think it's shaky on the ED front, but not on the bullying front. If they have an anti-bullying policy they're liable for what happens during school hours.
And I actually think we should definitely be holding kids accountable for the consequences of their actions. We except those subjected to them to do so, why not those perpetrating the problem?
@NewsBunny: Oh, thank you. :} I don't normally talk about all that because, though I'm 30, it still hits a raw nerve for me.
But, just wanted to say to Nora Charles, not upset with you...just the general lack of bullying procedures most schools seem to have. The expectation of dealing with it seems to rest entirely on those victimized, and it's frustrating to see so little emphasis put on those who do the bullying.
@tiredfairy: I'm sorry you had to go through that.
In cases where school administrators and educators witness bullying and ignore it, of course they should be held responsible. But I think that people, and parents of those who are being bullied especially, jump to the conclusions that that's what's going on when there's no serious evidence that there is. In order to hold a school responsible for the bullying, I think that two things need to be proven:
a) That they witnessed it, and
b) That they did nothing about it.
In terms of the first case, a huge amount of bullying takes place outside of the teachers' eyes. This is especially true after the bullying has been reported and some sort of "punishment" has been handed down. In the teacher's eyes, the bullying has stopped, but in reality, the bully has just learned to do it elsewhere.
Also, as a kid, you feel like you're the only one being bullied, but in reality, there are plenty of others going through the same thing. When there's one teacher and her class has six bullies, there's no way she can stop each and every incident even if she does witness them, which is unlikely in and of itself.
In terms of point B, things get even tougher. Unfortunately, the teachers can't address the root causes of bullying (which almost always come from the parents or older siblings or the child's family life in general). That means that no matter what punishment the child receives for the bullying--suspension, a chat with the principal, an anti-bullying program--the bullying is still likely to continue. People seem to be assuming that because the bullying continues, the administrators ignored it--but that's simply not true. The teachers and other school officials can punish the child however they like, but without the help of the parents, the behavior is unlikely to change.
Of course I would love to see schools being a bully-free zone. But it just doesn't seem feasible. I see a lot of people saying, "Oh, the schools need to put an end to this," but not any realistic suggestions as to how that's going to happen. The obvious answers have already been done, and they aren't making a difference. So how do we do it?
As for why the bullies themselves can't be held responsible? They're children. They don't understand what effect their words can have. I'm not saying that they shouldn't be punished, but they absolutely cannot be held morally responsible for the eating disorders or suicide attempts or depression or whatever results from their bullying, because their brains are not developed enough to understand that bullying could lead to that. One of my friends tells me about a boy in her third grade class who was widely bullied for a whole host of reasons . . . and he ended up killing himself by setting himself on fire. (Obviously he also had issues at home that led to this.) This story is heartbreaking, but obviously no child in that class had the cognitive ability to recognize what effect their bullying would have. Probably the child himself did not make the connection between the bullying and the suicide when he chose to do it. As adults, we can make those connections, but children can't. The idea that someday, those children may be held legally responsible for that child's death is terrifying to me. People seem to be forgetting that bullying is largely a "natural," involuntary social interaction that needs to be socialized out of us. I'm not saying that that makes it right; I'm saying that that means that children will resort to it until they mature emotionally enough to make better decisions. They can't voluntarily make the decision to become more mature, and there is only so much a teacher can do to push them along if the other adult figures in their lives aren't modeling the correct behaviors.
@nora charles: I think some of that might be true in younger children, although I think kids have a more reasonable idea of what is and is not okay than people think (though yes, they are under-developed). But a lot of bullying goes on in adolescence, when they absolutely do know right from wrong. And if we don't reinforce, even when they're young, then they won't learn.
I don't actually think the school or the kids are responsible for this girls ED. I think they're responsible for their contributing to bullying. I think that, like abuse, situations like this can contribute to whatever outlet a person seeks to deal with it...whether it's depression or an ED. Without the bullying, they may not have developed such alienation and depression, for instance. Those are consequences of the bullying. I don't know too many kids who would react to being ostracized and picked on with bubbly self esteem. It's like any other abuse. We would never say a woman who has been verbally or physically abused by a partner who then became depressed was to blame, and we'd hold the partner accountable for having caused that situation. Just because kids don't always understand the consequences of their actions, doesn't mean they aren't responsible for what they do. It's a pretty important life lesson, learning that what you say and do can effect other people.
It's like any abuse, no matter the age of the abuser. I'm not saying lock kids up, but it has to be treated as more serious than it is. Because as you said, they're still developing, and if that behavior goes unchecked it gets worse in adolescence, and then adulthood.
Like most things, this stuff has to be taught earlier on. We can't police what people are teaching their kids at home, but we can make sure that anti-bullying social skills are started much younger and that school policies are consistent about consequences. They should start the second kids enter daycare, or at the very least pre-school. My niece had a program like that and at 5 she actively stopped the bullying behaviors of other classmates because she knew it was wrong. The pressure has to come from adults as well as other children.
I think the reason most people feel as though it's being ignored is that many people here have clearly had that experience, and that seems to be the case above. It's anecdotal, but I know my school system did nothing about bullying until Columbine happened. No policies, other than blaming victims. Even when it happened right in front of them. Mainly because they shared the attitude that it was just how things are.
The bullying I experienced was primarily in adolescence. By that point, it was too late to do much to correct the behavior. Because no one had bothered to try when they were younger.
I was bullied daily by a group of girls during grades 6th and 7th. The only thing that stopped it was moving to a school they did not attend.
The school did nothing even when I complained and I never told my parents because I figure the school would not listen to them either *I know, kids can be kinda dumb) and the girls would just get worse.
Daily bullying wears you down, ruins your self-worth and makes you, the victim, begin to wonder if what they are saying is right.
Kids kill themselves because of bullying.
There is NOTHING good about bullying and schools that know it is going on and do nothing should be held accountable.
Even at 46 I still can remember how it felt and know that some of the self-worth issues of my teen and twenties are rooted in the daily emotional abuse I recived at the hands of those girls.
Well, legally speaking, it likely doesn't mitigate what happened that B.G. may have been genetically predisposed to become anorexic -- in tort law there's a rule called the "eggshell skull rule," which basically says that if you intentionally commit a tort against someone (such as physical abuse -- or verbal abuse, which is considered a tort in some instances), you're liable for whatever follows from your actions, even if you couldn't have known what the consequences would be. So, for instance, if your skull is as thin as an eggshell, and I punch you in the face, and your skull collapses and you wind up getting brain damage, I'm liable for the brain damage even if I only meant to give you a black eye.
So the kids who bullied her would be liable for causing her to develop anorexia, even if they didn't know she was predisposed to it and only intended to embarrass her for an afternoon. To the extent that the school is vicariously liable for its students, then, the school could be liable for her anorexia.
ETA: annnnnnd I see someone else beat me to it downthread....
I have mixed feelings on this situation. My sister was bullied because she was heavier, something my parents did absolutely nothing about until she was older, and my mom made a huge deal about the bullying, which totally singled her out to students. Which, of course made the bullying worse. I guess I reacted in a weird way by becoming obsessed with weight loss and developing an ED, due to many other circumstances, etc. I have been teased for being fat, even by boyfriends, and I am a size 2. It does make things worse, BUT I really feel like the survival of the fittest applies to kids. When my sister went out into the real world she settled and is not very tough. I think also if my mom didn't fight back so much blindly, she would not be overweight today. My mom should have looked at some of that as a wake up call to her.
I feel like part of the educational experience of schools is to give kids a taste of what the real world is honestly like. I wonder how much the stress of living with an overbearing parent or other family situation contributed.
In my personal experience, ED is just a way to express feeling some sort of stress.
@agentsee: ED's are different for every person who has one. We don't know all the causes and triggers, and they're individual anyway. I tend to see them as an outlet or means of controlling something in an otherwise confusing and uncontrollable world. Sometimes it's your immediate world, like family or school, sometime it's more general. But whatever it is, you can control your own body, and it's one of way feeling like it's not all outside of your ability to deal with it.
No one thing causes an ED, but many things contribute to it. Including abuse, by the way, which bullying can be.
I find your idea that "survival of the fittest" is what this is about troubling, though. Bullying can be mild to severe. And just because the real world is tough doesn't mean we should tolerate it when children abuse other children.
Bullying makes you feel helpless, alone, afraid, and untrusting. It destroys self worth and can lead to depression, anxiety, and other problems. Some people may be able to get past that on their own, but many aren't. Because when you're a child you're just starting to form your idea of who you are. And some of that comes from how you're treated by others. Acting as though the victim is the person at fault just leads to excusing the behavior.
And just for the record, bullying is a form of systematic abuse. Being called a name once is painful, but it's not the same as being relentlessly targeted every day.
"With eating disorders, we say you're born with a gun and life pulls the trigger." Megan Meier was, it seems, born with mental health issues and Lori Drew pulled that trigger - and is being held accountable for it (at least in terms of the public condemnation and the legal precedent the case has set). Given the school's responsibility for providing a safe learning environment, their inaction would seem to make them accountable.
We had a student's parents sue for bullying last year. It was a big mess, as he was far from blameless (though still what happened to him was wrong), and students here were really upset that he was presenting such an unfairly negative view of the school to the national media.
Anyway, I feel really bad for that girl, but I'm not sure a lawsuit is the right solution. But then, maybe it will have a good effect in bringing these issues to light in that school.
@Plate2.18: What was unfair about the portrayal of the school? Were they actually interfering to stop the bullying? Why should he need to be "blameless", whatever that means? Wrong is wrong and educators and bystanders blaming victims is a major factor in allowing bullying to continue with tacit approval of the school community.
@Hana Maru: I thought someone might say that, so I added the parentheses, but I still see your concern. Wrong is wrong, absolutely. But with one of the incidents cited no one ever mentioned that reason the boy got beat up is because he first mocked a boy's recently deceased mother (not that he deserved it then). Or that one of the reasons he was disliked is because he beat up a kid with cerebral palsy who uses a wheelchair.
I still think what happened to him was absolutely wrong and he did not deserve it. I know that bullying can turn people into bullies, and I definitely think that was part of the reason he was aggressive himself. It was just frustrating to see absolutely none of this mentioned in the coverage of this.
The school officials do try to stop bullying and if there was any blaming the victim here it was from the students (which I do not agree with and which all our teachers tried to stop). I personally never experienced or witnessed any bullying at the school, which doesn't mean it didn't happen, but all the reports from the media made it sound like a hellhole. Most of the events actually happened outside of the school or in the school he had just moved up from, anyway.
Sorry, that was long. I really don't blame him and I think what happened to him was wrong. It was just frustrating for everyone involved.
Schools should do something about bullying, yes. I was bullied, and I do not have friendly memories of the teachers who saw it going on and did nothing, even when my parents brought it up. However, I think it is a reach to pin an eating disorder on specific actions a school did or did not take.
@Flackette Goes Retro: I agree wholeheartedly that the bullying needs to be addressed. My school/teachers did nothing until the bullying got physical, and even then my parents had to bring it up. Still, blaming bullies for outright causing an ED is another issue.
While I feel you can't pin an ED on one specific reason, this girl's school should still be protecting it's students from bullying, and the emotional side effects of the bullying. From what I've read, it appears the school neglected to do this, and can be held liable for the side effects as a result of their inaction.
08/20/09
Some little girls -- a pair of Jewish girls and a black girl -- started going at each other. It reached a fever pitch when Certain Words were thrown about in a very frightening Lord of the Flies playground race riot.
Our principal, the gentle post-hippie Dr. Milgrim, took those three girls into her office and talked to them, and made them talk to each other. for like an hour. When other names came up -- deputies and witnesses -- those girls were called in, too. Concessions were made. Apologies were given. Dr. Milgrim taught us the term "we don't have to like each other but we do have to get along at school." The woman was goddamn Dumbledore except she did her job.
The bullying stopped. Race and religion stopped being interesting. the girls grew up rather nice and friendly, tho not with each other. It worked because Dr. Milgrim didn't treat us like a bunch of little girls, she asked us our problems and taught us how to work through them, like adults. Stopping bullying can work, but administrators have to get to the root of the problem and they have to LISTEN. Children's world is not your world. It is an alien place and for a grownup to come in and settle things, he can't stick a bandaid on a problem with some rhetoric. There are no bullies, there's just relationships. Some are good, some are bad.
08/20/09
Your principal knew this and treated these children like people. Perhaps their problems are small, but that doesn't mean they aren't important. And better to resolve small problems now than be unable to solve big ones later on in life.
Final note, it is vitally important to listen and respect a child's pain. After all, it may be small to us, but it is very big to them. And the girl in the article is the tragic evidence of that fact.
08/19/09
I know I sound cynical, which is why I got out of the game when I did. Childhood is like a giant internet flame war with standardized tests.
Did bullying cause this girl's disorder? I don't know, but it certainly didn't help.
08/19/09
2) Bullies are jerks, yes. They do horrible things, yes. But there is something to be learned from bullies: they are everywhere, and they don't end at school. There are bullies everywhere in life. Even if you made it through school without being bullied, somewhere, someone eventually will bully you. Some people are just jerks. It's a good thing to learn. Jerk Idenification, Jerk Avoidance, and How to Not Be a Jerk are important things to learn. But jerks will never go away altogether. To some extents, your kid has to learn to deal with it eventually.
08/19/09
1. Yes. And part of school is learning social skills along with math and reading and science. They are not mutually exclusive. The fact that bullying goes on in classrooms says that A. overcrowding is an issue and B. it's allowing destructive behavior to go unchecked.
2. ::sigh:: There are a lot of threads addressing this, but you can learn lots of life lessons about how tough it is in the "real" world without bullying. If people physically threaten or harm you as an adult, they can be charged with assault. There are consequences in the adult world for bullying behavior (like harassment laws, sexual and otherwise). And yet we seem completely comfortable with not addressing these behaviors when people are younger and at their most susceptible to learning consequences.
The burden of dealing with bullying seems to be laid entirely at the feet of those victimized by it, and that seems troubling to me. Why aren't those who perpetuate this behavior held accountable, or even expected to be held accountable?
Kids who are bullied and don't have it addressed don't learn that sometimes people are jerks. They learn that abuse is okay, and tolerated, and something they have to put up with. That's not the same lesson. Because you do have ways to address it as an adult. Another adult can't just harass you on a daily basis, or hit you, or call you names in the work place.
Plus, there are levels of bullying. It sucks to be called a name a few times, but it's not the same as systematic abuse. Like being targeted, physically assaulted, sexually harassed, or verbally assaulted on a daily basis. I don't know anyone who would come out of that unscathed and there's no reason not to deal with it, or to just shrug our shoulders and say "oh, well, sometimes people suck". That's how you end up teaching kids that it's okay to abuse other people.
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
Bullying is aggressively targeting someone, and then repetitively verbally or physically intimidating/insulting/assaulting them. It's quite different than someone who just isn't very nice. It's a systematic way of tearing someone down, consistently. Though someone can be bullied once, or multiple times, I'd say it's rarely a one-time occurrence.
Lots of kids learn that life isn't perfect but aren't subjected to daily bullying. I think we're looking at this like, if kids don't get a lot of hard knocks, they won't get "tough". i think kids get plenty of hard knocks just by virtue of being a kid. And bullying will happen. But we can do a lot to prevent it.
I mean, unless they're taught otherwise, bullies as children grown up to be adult bullies. And they're generally the ones I see starting fights, or abusing partners. It's a bad cycle.
08/19/09
I'm still fat, but I have issues with food, like not liking to eat in front of people. I am fat, and therefore do not deserve food.
I also went on a self-designed diet in high school where I would eat nothing but Dexatrim -- the OLD Dexatrim -- during the day and only eat dinner at night.
And all those teachers and guidence counselers said -- oh, it's just what kids do. You need to toughen up.
One of my most vivid memories is having gotten what I thought was a beautiful red leather jacket in third grade from my grandmother. The class conspired to hide it behind an extremely dusty filing cabinet in the coatroom. And the nun had me stand up in front of the class with her while she told the class they should be ashamed and that I was a good, beautiful girl.
Sister Eileen, you meant well.
08/19/09
Having been bullied, I am astounded at how simple it is to get them to back down now, and I really wish I'd known more about it at the time.
08/19/09
Having been bullied myself, I honestly don't think teaching empathy and niceness to a bunch of 15 year olds does anything. 15 year olds can be vicious bastards, which is why I also reject the concept that bullying of that kind happens in the 'real world' so you should just suck it up. Nothing is as awful as high school, not least because when you're that age you feel everything so much more acutely. But the benefit of a school environment is that there are authorities who really have the ability to punish bullies, and to get them hard. If bullies really believe they're going to be in serious trouble, it doesn't stop everything, but it sure helps--if only by giving bullied students the confidence to feel like they have the upper hand.
08/19/09
08/19/09
As for the parents, they were very rarely involved in school goings-on, which kind of left it up to teachers. At least when I was in school, it was a culture in which teachers were generally assumed to be in the right (this is changing, thankfully, as we now know how generations of parental non-involvement in schooling enabled priests all over the country to do whatever the hell they wanted with their students). I don't think my parents ever once backed me against a teacher--if I got in trouble they assumed the teacher was right. Even when my principal blatantly hated me, my parents' approach was basically, deal with it.
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09
Expulsion? The bully goes to another school and finds someone new to pick on.
Suspension? The kid comes back and the bullying resumes.
Mediation, counseling, and anti-bullying programs? Rarely have much of a long-term effect.
Sent to the principal's office? The bully just hides their bullying better the next time.
Also, because a lot of bullying has no evidence, just a he said/she said thing, it's often hard for the schools to do anything at all.
Unfortunately, no matter what the punishment, it doesn't usually address the root causes of bullying. There's only so much that a school can be held accountable for.
08/19/09
08/20/09
And frankly, the root cause of bullying is...bullying. Many child bullies are abused by parents or older siblings, and their victims may find more victims. Administrative inaction emboldens them and speeds the cycle along.
One notorious bully from my middle school was allowed to escalate her behavior, in full view of teachers, until she stabbed another child with a dull pair of scissors. She was suspended and put into counseling sessions afterward. Whether it solved the "root cause" of her behavior or not, she learned that her behavior was not to be tolerated and she cut it out. The school got a little nicer, a little safer. So often, adults deliberately let bullying slide because they simply don't think it's serious, or they think it's good for kids. They would never tolerate the same in their own work environment.
08/20/09
08/20/09
08/19/09
Why do so many of us consider this good practice for children, but not for us? You don't stop learning social lessons, stop "toughening up" when you become an adult.
How many of you, who defend bullying as "survival of the fittest" or something bullied kids bring on themselves, would stick it out in a workplace where your colleagues and superiors either bullied you or stood by and watched? How many of you would be grateful for the life lessons it provided?
I'm dying to know.
08/19/09
I don't think it's usually fair to hold schools responsible for the acts that occur within their halls. Sure, if a gross lapse in attention or judgment occurs, then it's fair. But even when kids are being bullied, there's only so much intervening the school can do. You can't have some adult's eyes on every single victim of bullying every single minute of the day. Kids are sneaky, and eventually the would-be bullies will find some moment or method to act out, even when they are being supervised.
Plus, my gut feeling is that she would have developed the eating disorder anyway. You don't develop an eating disorder because someone tells you you're fat; you develop it as a reaction to the stresses in your life. If she hadn't been bullied, there would have been other types of stress that would have likely sent her down the same road.
08/19/09
I was bullied in full view of teachers for 2 years of my life. I was verbally and physically abused...I was sexually harassed, spit on, groped. On a daily basis. In every class. My teachers did nothing. My parents did nothing. The school did nothing, even when they were told, even when it was right in front of them.
I developed anxiety and depression, and years later, an ED. Largely because people had told me I was fat, every day. That I was fat and disgusting and worthless. That was a huge contributor to how I viewed myself, and why I though starvation might "solve" that problem. I don't blame my ED on anyone, but at the same time, the actions of others contributed to the problem.
The school, just like the bullies, are responsible for their actions and inactions. If I'm responsible for my reaction to it, why aren't they for putting me in that position? If they aren't, who is? How are the bullies not responsible for what they chose to say and do? How is the school not responsible for not stepping in?
I'm not trying to attack you, I know what you mean. But we don't know why each person develops an ED. Some people develop them from sexual abuse, others from not wanting to develop sexually, some from family control issues, others from social pressure etc. We don't know if she would have developed an ED anyway, and that's not really a good excuse for the school not to be held accountable for doing nothing in this situation.
If a grown up were being sexually harassed in the workplace, we'd expect the law to do something about it. Why don't we expect schools and teachers and parents?
In this case, the bullies aren't being held accountable. The school is. I think it's shaky on the ED front, but not on the bullying front. If they have an anti-bullying policy they're liable for what happens during school hours.
And I actually think we should definitely be holding kids accountable for the consequences of their actions. We except those subjected to them to do so, why not those perpetrating the problem?
08/19/09
08/19/09
But, just wanted to say to Nora Charles, not upset with you...just the general lack of bullying procedures most schools seem to have. The expectation of dealing with it seems to rest entirely on those victimized, and it's frustrating to see so little emphasis put on those who do the bullying.
08/19/09
In cases where school administrators and educators witness bullying and ignore it, of course they should be held responsible. But I think that people, and parents of those who are being bullied especially, jump to the conclusions that that's what's going on when there's no serious evidence that there is. In order to hold a school responsible for the bullying, I think that two things need to be proven:
a) That they witnessed it, and
b) That they did nothing about it.
In terms of the first case, a huge amount of bullying takes place outside of the teachers' eyes. This is especially true after the bullying has been reported and some sort of "punishment" has been handed down. In the teacher's eyes, the bullying has stopped, but in reality, the bully has just learned to do it elsewhere.
Also, as a kid, you feel like you're the only one being bullied, but in reality, there are plenty of others going through the same thing. When there's one teacher and her class has six bullies, there's no way she can stop each and every incident even if she does witness them, which is unlikely in and of itself.
In terms of point B, things get even tougher. Unfortunately, the teachers can't address the root causes of bullying (which almost always come from the parents or older siblings or the child's family life in general). That means that no matter what punishment the child receives for the bullying--suspension, a chat with the principal, an anti-bullying program--the bullying is still likely to continue. People seem to be assuming that because the bullying continues, the administrators ignored it--but that's simply not true. The teachers and other school officials can punish the child however they like, but without the help of the parents, the behavior is unlikely to change.
Of course I would love to see schools being a bully-free zone. But it just doesn't seem feasible. I see a lot of people saying, "Oh, the schools need to put an end to this," but not any realistic suggestions as to how that's going to happen. The obvious answers have already been done, and they aren't making a difference. So how do we do it?
As for why the bullies themselves can't be held responsible? They're children. They don't understand what effect their words can have. I'm not saying that they shouldn't be punished, but they absolutely cannot be held morally responsible for the eating disorders or suicide attempts or depression or whatever results from their bullying, because their brains are not developed enough to understand that bullying could lead to that. One of my friends tells me about a boy in her third grade class who was widely bullied for a whole host of reasons . . . and he ended up killing himself by setting himself on fire. (Obviously he also had issues at home that led to this.) This story is heartbreaking, but obviously no child in that class had the cognitive ability to recognize what effect their bullying would have. Probably the child himself did not make the connection between the bullying and the suicide when he chose to do it. As adults, we can make those connections, but children can't. The idea that someday, those children may be held legally responsible for that child's death is terrifying to me. People seem to be forgetting that bullying is largely a "natural," involuntary social interaction that needs to be socialized out of us. I'm not saying that that makes it right; I'm saying that that means that children will resort to it until they mature emotionally enough to make better decisions. They can't voluntarily make the decision to become more mature, and there is only so much a teacher can do to push them along if the other adult figures in their lives aren't modeling the correct behaviors.
08/19/09
I don't actually think the school or the kids are responsible for this girls ED. I think they're responsible for their contributing to bullying. I think that, like abuse, situations like this can contribute to whatever outlet a person seeks to deal with it...whether it's depression or an ED. Without the bullying, they may not have developed such alienation and depression, for instance. Those are consequences of the bullying. I don't know too many kids who would react to being ostracized and picked on with bubbly self esteem. It's like any other abuse. We would never say a woman who has been verbally or physically abused by a partner who then became depressed was to blame, and we'd hold the partner accountable for having caused that situation. Just because kids don't always understand the consequences of their actions, doesn't mean they aren't responsible for what they do. It's a pretty important life lesson, learning that what you say and do can effect other people.
It's like any abuse, no matter the age of the abuser. I'm not saying lock kids up, but it has to be treated as more serious than it is. Because as you said, they're still developing, and if that behavior goes unchecked it gets worse in adolescence, and then adulthood.
Like most things, this stuff has to be taught earlier on. We can't police what people are teaching their kids at home, but we can make sure that anti-bullying social skills are started much younger and that school policies are consistent about consequences. They should start the second kids enter daycare, or at the very least pre-school. My niece had a program like that and at 5 she actively stopped the bullying behaviors of other classmates because she knew it was wrong. The pressure has to come from adults as well as other children.
I think the reason most people feel as though it's being ignored is that many people here have clearly had that experience, and that seems to be the case above. It's anecdotal, but I know my school system did nothing about bullying until Columbine happened. No policies, other than blaming victims. Even when it happened right in front of them. Mainly because they shared the attitude that it was just how things are.
The bullying I experienced was primarily in adolescence. By that point, it was too late to do much to correct the behavior. Because no one had bothered to try when they were younger.
08/19/09
The school did nothing even when I complained and I never told my parents because I figure the school would not listen to them either *I know, kids can be kinda dumb) and the girls would just get worse.
Daily bullying wears you down, ruins your self-worth and makes you, the victim, begin to wonder if what they are saying is right.
Kids kill themselves because of bullying.
There is NOTHING good about bullying and schools that know it is going on and do nothing should be held accountable.
Even at 46 I still can remember how it felt and know that some of the self-worth issues of my teen and twenties are rooted in the daily emotional abuse I recived at the hands of those girls.
08/19/09
So the kids who bullied her would be liable for causing her to develop anorexia, even if they didn't know she was predisposed to it and only intended to embarrass her for an afternoon. To the extent that the school is vicariously liable for its students, then, the school could be liable for her anorexia.
ETA: annnnnnd I see someone else beat me to it downthread....
08/19/09
I feel like part of the educational experience of schools is to give kids a taste of what the real world is honestly like. I wonder how much the stress of living with an overbearing parent or other family situation contributed.
In my personal experience, ED is just a way to express feeling some sort of stress.
08/19/09
No one thing causes an ED, but many things contribute to it. Including abuse, by the way, which bullying can be.
I find your idea that "survival of the fittest" is what this is about troubling, though. Bullying can be mild to severe. And just because the real world is tough doesn't mean we should tolerate it when children abuse other children.
Bullying makes you feel helpless, alone, afraid, and untrusting. It destroys self worth and can lead to depression, anxiety, and other problems. Some people may be able to get past that on their own, but many aren't. Because when you're a child you're just starting to form your idea of who you are. And some of that comes from how you're treated by others. Acting as though the victim is the person at fault just leads to excusing the behavior.
And just for the record, bullying is a form of systematic abuse. Being called a name once is painful, but it's not the same as being relentlessly targeted every day.
08/19/09
08/19/09
Anyway, I feel really bad for that girl, but I'm not sure a lawsuit is the right solution. But then, maybe it will have a good effect in bringing these issues to light in that school.
08/19/09
08/19/09
I still think what happened to him was absolutely wrong and he did not deserve it. I know that bullying can turn people into bullies, and I definitely think that was part of the reason he was aggressive himself. It was just frustrating to see absolutely none of this mentioned in the coverage of this.
The school officials do try to stop bullying and if there was any blaming the victim here it was from the students (which I do not agree with and which all our teachers tried to stop). I personally never experienced or witnessed any bullying at the school, which doesn't mean it didn't happen, but all the reports from the media made it sound like a hellhole. Most of the events actually happened outside of the school or in the school he had just moved up from, anyway.
Sorry, that was long. I really don't blame him and I think what happened to him was wrong. It was just frustrating for everyone involved.
08/19/09
08/19/09
08/19/09