Just thinking back to when I was a kid dealing with extreme bullying and homophobia, it would be really painful to hear that Maine and California and all the other states were voting against allowing me to do what my parents got to do. It would have been like being called "fag boy" but by an entire state. #oprahellenportiaderossi
My lesbian cousin got married the same week that Portia and Ellen did. Her father, who is very Catholic and a career military man, came to the wedding. I think he'd rather have a straight daughter but he was there and actually said some very nice things about his new daughter in law. It was rather sweet. I think most people would change their minds about gay marriage if they actually knew or were related to gay people that want to be married. When you're at the wedding, seeing how happy they are, there is no way you can want to deny that. #oprahellenportiaderossi
@PennyFarthing: I agree with you wholeheartedly. Ellen mentioned something about the fear factor, which is essentially fear of the unknown. But, how unfamiliar is love? It is one of the deepest, most basic human emotions, one we all share (the ability to love, I mean), as well as having a family. Quite easy to connect with those things, isn't it? #oprahellenportiaderossi
@OneTwoPunch: It does boggle the mind, doesn't it? What really confuses me is that if gay people don't have the right to marry, they can still can be gay and live together and adopt children (in most states). Not allowing them to marry doesn't stop people from being gay and living like married people. It just gives them no rights. Gargh! I don't get it!! #oprahellenportiaderossi
@PennyFarthing: It's odd, esp. given instances when gay couples greatly outlast many hetero couples in longevity, yet they still remain shut out from basic family rights. If they are stable enough to remain together AND raise a family, give 'em what we get! Isn't "family values" all about providing a stable environment for children? If a couple can do that (cue a weepy "It's for the children"!) then more power to them. Legally-speaking. #oprahellenportiaderossi
I caught this show last night and found it very interesting. Portia described the differences between living together and marriage exactly the way, I, as a straight person, perceived it. They are two vastly different states of being.
I was very happy that they were legally bound, and can receive the same rights and privileges as hetero couples. They seem very much in love, although, truth be told, Ellen seemed to have a lot of therapy-speak mixed in. She seems to have lots more to work on. Portia seemed the more centered of the two, but maybe because she is not in the spotlight as much. That level of fame, esp. connected with the issues surrounding the couple, must be overpowering at times.
Forget all the love and committment crap, one of the most crucial components of marriage today is rights. My husband works in construction, an inherently dangerous line of work. It occurred to us that if he were ever incapacitated due to a work accident, I would have no say in his care, or even have the right to see him.
@jelodi: This is why I got married when I did. My mother died and I realized that should my husband die I wouldn't even have any say over where he was buried. Just fucking AWFUL. #oprahellenportiaderossi
As someone who believes in God and the bible I want to point out that it's a really big concept that some seem to miss, but believers are told continuously NOT to judge others. For anything.
In my mind it's a big world and love is rare between people and it's not my place to tell others how to live. It's just not. I'm glad they are happy--I'm glad anyone can find that connection with another soul. We are all just people trying to make our way.
I'm of the opinion that souls don't intrinsically have a gender...and neither does God, who sees our souls. So the whole idea of a person's gender determining worth or wrong by acts or whatnot is moot. What imperfect people have decided to do by setting up societal rules is in and of itself imperfect.
Too crackpot? Maybe...but it keeps my life really peaceful. I'm not driven to expend energy in a negative hurtful way. #oprahellenportiaderossi
@Sugah: You are an awesome example of what religion really is about. I highly recommend you going about preaching your beliefs #oprahellenportiaderossi
As a lesbian in a long term relationship (getting close to our 7th anniversary) I love looking at them, Melissa Etheridge and Tammy Lynn Etheridge, and every other stable gay couple. They give us hope, and offer a celebrity reflection of our relationships.
I wish gay marriage were legal, because then my partner could get on my health care, and get radiation and pain management, treatment that she needs to fight this cancer effectively. And then, we could have more children, because we won't be worrying about her dying any more... #oprahellenportiaderossi
@dialing_footnoterphone: This is a perfect example of why legal marriage is more than just a word. It affects your life. I wish you and your partner the best, and hope you can soon call her your wife. #oprahellenportiaderossi
So, after like half-a-dozen times of Portia saying "My wife", Oprah asks, "So, you call each other wives?" Hehe. Usually I don't bandwagoneer on the Jezzie Oprah hate, but that was a dumb question. #oprahellenportiaderossi
@Ulookinatmyjunk, JOC: Eh, I think here she was clarifying it for the audience, who may not have so much exposure to gay couples. I've seen a lot of anti-gay propaganda showing gay men referring to their male partners as "my wife" in an attempt to be inflammatory and derogatory, so clearing up what married lesbians call each other is probably helpful to a lot of people. #oprahellenportiaderossi
All this comes down to is what marriage means to the general public. A declaration of love? God? Making it legal? The opportunity to have kids? Safety? Guarantees? Solidifying your love in front of those you love? Commitment? Finances?
Marriage means so many different things to so many different people.
Anyone uncomfortable with gay marriage is either 1) insecure in their own marriage or 2) has wrapped their entire identity around being a spouse.
Marriage is considered the ultimate validation of binary gender roles, and the goal of all gender conditioning. The entire belief in the infallibility of those gender roles, which is what allows the Patriarchal/Christian/Capitalist ideology to continue to hold power, rests on straight marriage remaining a cultural institution.
If gay marriage were legal & accepted in our culture, and forms of sexuality outside of heterosexuality were treated as equal (or even acknowledged as valid), all of that would be undermined. If being a lesbian is an accepted way of life, then culture doesn't tell a little girl she has to wear a dress when she doesn't want to. A four year old boy who speaks in a feminine voice isn't chastised until he changes it, if growing up to be gay is considered an option. Classes and sports don't have to be split along gender, and can't be, because it is acknowledged that you can't distinguish who is gay and who is straight or assume heterosexuality. So how do you deal with the locker rooms once you admit that members of the same sex may be attracted to one another? Starting from a young age, gender conditioning would become much more difficult and complex.
And if you can't program gender and start the inequality gap young, girls will be given the same opportunities in school as boys, and encouraged to succeed in what have been considered "boy" subjects. Neither gender will feel alienated from the other, which means that once they hit puberty, the straight ones among them will be able to pair off with less of the psychological damage that happens now, and less resentment or mischaracterization of the opposite sex.
Essentially, women will be treated as equals, and cease to be kept down by gender roles that condition them to be stupid, weak, insecure, accomodating, and less ambitious than men. Men will feel less pressure to be dominant, aggressive, competitive, and masculine, or to feel entitled or superior to women.
And that sense of the superiority and dominance of the masculine, and the servitude & nurturing nature of the feminine, is what Christianity is based on. God is the ultimate Man, and people are His servants (a feminine role in contrast). Next in line in the microcosm of that dynamic is the Husband, who is the God to his wife. The wife is stuck in the Mother role, having been convinced that it is her "biological nature" to have children & serve her family. Which distracts her and keeps her powerless, or as powerless as possible, socially, religiously, and politically.
Gender roles extend to almost every aspect of our lives in the world as it is now: We could think of our country as being masculine, and the world as being feminine. We control it, and it serves us, while other countries compete for use of it's life-giving systems and try to claim dominion over it.
In politics, the politicians are masculine, and the voters are feminine. The politicians define the rules and provide the resources, while the voters work within the politician's system and sustain it through their work, while always maintaining a sense of patriotism and commitment to the country that claims to give them everything that they have.
In our economy, the corporations are the men, and the consumers are the women. The corporations may be created by consumers, but they grow to become a set of entities that control the consumer, setting the standards, upholding and reflecting the cultural values and aesthetic, defining what the consumer's life experience is made up of, and providing the consumer with things they believe they need, as long as the consumer gives the corporation their time & money.
All of these things are accepted unquestioningly because the intrinsic nature of gender roles are taken for granted and assumed to be natural laws. If we legalized gay marriage, we would be admitting that the phenomenon of "gay" isn't a psychological illness, a sin, a form of sexual deviance, or a phase. We wouldn't be able to just deny it, ignore it, and exclude it's existence from our perception of reality. We would be forced to face sexuality and actually see it. Right now it's so ingrained in our every action that we're mostly not even aware of it (and those that are, are probably feminists). Gay marriage would offer a contrast & we would have an opportunity to realize how much of our life is not a universal experience like we assumed, but something specific to us, and something that has a cause, and an alternative.
It would be like seeing someone fly, and realizing that it isn't that youcan't fly because humans can't fly and that's just the way it is, but that you possibly could fly, you've just never tried because you had been told so plainly, so many times, that it was impossible, and you never thought to try. Right now, it's like there are stories of people flying, and most of us know someone who can do it or who has seen it done, but either they're mistaken, or lying, or those people who can fly are using machines to do it, or there is something morally suspect to them & they can't be trusted. So that it happens doesn't seem to matter because it doesn't have anything to do with us. But if our government suddenly told us that those people really were flying, that it was natural and legitimate, and that they were guaranteed the right to fly just as much as the rest of us are guaranteed the right to walk, then suddenly, it does apply to you. And the entire system is revealed to be built on a lie.
Not only would it fall apart naturally, but once people realized they had been held back, limited, and lied to, and realized the power and freedom they actually had, they'd be pissed off at anyone who tried to control them again. Anti Gay Marriage people know that the lifestyle they live and love is in direct contrast with the fact of homosexuality. They know they're full of shit, but they're comfortable that way. They need everyone else to believe that they are illegitimate, powerless, and seperated from society as a whole, "real" society, because their way of life is so delicately balanced on denial and condemnation of anything that challenges their idiology that it would have nothing to stand on if any other way of viewing reality were considered a possibility.
I'm very sorry that this is so long.
But I've wondered for a really long time what the fuck these people are thinking, because it never seemed to make ANY logical sense. But I think that this is it, and if we can understand it, we can do something about it, because reason doesn't work, and most of them will overlook the constitution and basic human decency when it comes to gay rights so there really isn't hope of an argument that will convince them. The only thing we can do is strike at the vein & try to understand what's underlying the seemingly absurd things these people say & do to protect their paradigm... #oprahellenportiaderossi
@prismatism: I don't have much to add to that, but living in Maine, I've thought about this a lot too. I do think that marriage somehow validates people as being adults, or stable, contributing members of society. I don't know if these people secretly hate marriage and the only thing they are getting out of it is the pleasure of being validated, but given that I've heard the refrain of "making a mockery of marriage" obviously marriage is much more to them then the relationship with their spouse. It is their relationship to society (I guess a superior one) which is somehow being threatened. I'm married myself, and I just don't get it. However, I am also convinced that a whole lot of it is simply hatred of gay people and not being able to stand that gay people would be accepted. Not just tolerated, but allowed to stand on that exalted pedestal of marriage that straight people see as theirs. #oprahellenportiaderossi
I've had an idea for a while that I feel should be considered as a solution to this issue, but it seems too simple for no one to have thought of it before, so I am looking for any kind of feedback:
What if the government were to no longer issue marriage licenses, but instead grant civil unions to all couples regardless of their sex. Then, if the couple so chooses they may go to their place of worship and be married in the spiritual ritual of their choosing.
At the very least it seems like this could end the "sanctity of marriage" words war; but, I am an unmarried atheist so what do I know? #oprahellenportiaderossi
@calculatedrisk: I'm an unmarried secular humanist and I want to be married by a Justice of the Peace, like my parents were. And my gay friends should be allowed to do the same. I don't understand why conservative religious people get to act like they own the word marriage, it means different things to different people. Why should their hissy fit force the rest of us to change our words to appease them?
Words do matter. That's why Ellen and Portia call each other wife rather than partners. They want to be wives, and why can't they be?
@calculatedrisk: I like this idea, mostly because I don't like the religious connotations of 'marriage'. I don't want to be married in a church, or by anyone other than a justice of the peace. If people want to make their marriage based in religion, that's fine by me but the state should have nothing to do with it. #oprahellenportiaderossi
These two just radiate love. I cannot for the life of me understand why anyone would want to hinder that kind of commitment and love from flourishing. #oprahellenportiaderossi
Since it’s all about me, my partner and I were gonna marry in California when we visited Death Valley in late Dec 2008 but they voted down the bill after we booked our vacation. I even bought a white linen suit which I have not worn.
We were like eh, after being together for 24 years, erm, why mess with perfection? Marriage won’t change us. We share all finance matters, our names are co-signed to cars and property and I cook, she washes the dishes. I call for the pizza, she picks it up. By some miracle she is on my healthcare plan.
Having said that, being denied the marriage card STILL pisses me off.
@Rose.Selavy.Needs.A.Drink: For what it's worth, when I read your comment I got pissed off, too. I'm straight, but every time I think about this -- that people who've loved and been faithful to each other for decades can't get married, but any pair of halfwit heterosexuals who meet on the Vegas strip can get drunk, "fall in love", and get married before their buzz wears off -- I just want to scream it makes me so angry. It's so disgustingly small-minded and stupid and hateful and wrong. #oprahellenportiaderossi
@Rose.Selavy.Needs.A.Drink: Absolutely! It's soo...gah! Can't even articulate my anger. Way to go with your partner, though! That's really amazing and I'm happy you've made it work. #oprahellenportiaderossi
@MissNormaDesmond: word. my husband and i think that's why we have to support all of our brothers and sisters who want and deserve the right by standing up for them. until enough of us say it, loudly and clearly, that this is not only all right with us, but about damned time, they're still out there, fighting on their own. [www.meny.us]#oprahellenportiaderossi
@Rose.Selavy.Needs.A.Drink: my self? not big on the wholw marrige thing. don't get the point, just like you described. but because THEY don't let you, is so irritating that i want to do it. don't understand why is it the matter of the state how i live in my own home, what cermonies i chose to do and with whom. so i really feeling your story. hearted. #oprahellenportiaderossi
My partner and I are planning a "marriage" in August-- I put that word in quotes because we live in PA, where not even civil unions are recognized.
It's important for us to have this ceremony, to declare our love in front of our friends and (hopefully) our family. But legal recognition would be nice, and it's tough not to have it.
@thatgirlinnewyork: Well, I've been marching in pride parades, donating to political groups, writing to Congress, and otherwise refusing to be a "good heterosexual" for decades, but yeah, right on. #oprahellenportiaderossi
It is vital that they're allowed to marry. I'm currently learning about family law in SC, and the benefits that marriage bring are numerous. There is of course the overall acceptance of society in addition to full legal rights like those associated with wills, health insurance, tax benefits, and when necessary, equitable division of assets in a divorce. That said, SC's laws state three times in different places about no couples of the same gender, and ever since DOMA passed there has been a law prohibiting extension of the right to marry to gays and lesbians of SC. I suppose that it's not surprising at all, but seeing it staring up at me, mocking me almost, made me even more furious about the current situation in our country. There is just no justification for this kind of treatment. I hope these two and others keep making noise and we get to real equality soon. #oprahellenportiaderossi
In a world where 50% of marriages end in divorce and nearly 50% of surveyed married people have cheated on their spouse, I don't see what is so sacred about marriage in the first place. Even the Republicans who talk and talk about the sanctity of marriage are getting caught publicly cheating.
I don't think I need to go into how ridiculous that there should be a vote on whether or not to give a section of the population the same rights as the rest of population. #oprahellenportiaderossi
@Asha L Kydd: Agreed. I think the "sanctity of marriage" argument is total B.S. I mean, a straight person can meet a stranger in Vegas, have a few drinks, and then decide to go get married in a car at a drive-thru wedding chapel, but a gay couple that's been together for years and is truly in love can't get married at all? How is that not fucked up? #oprahellenportiaderossi
@IBleedGlitter: The High Priestess of Tinsel: Either I'm gifted with comment clairvoyance or our minds work very similarly, because I swear I hadn't read this when I wrote nearly the same exact thing a couple of comments up. #oprahellenportiaderossi
I am soooo envious of Ellen and Portia. Being gay is getting to be kinda ok now. It was such a big no-no when I was growing up. When I got caught looking at another girl in gym class, I thought I was dead meat right then. So, I dated boys. I ended up with a husband. I still love my best friend from high school. She loves me, too, but she would never let it happen, because she was so afraid of what her family and everyone else would think. #oprahellenportiaderossi
@VioletBlue: So sorry to hear that. It sucks that people have to distort their feelings, self-expression, their very lives in fear of judgment from others. To which I say, judge not, lest ye be judged. Words spoken by some commie hippie liberal elitist, no doubt. ;) #oprahellenportiaderossi
What sort of kills me in general is that Ellen's talk show is well liked and well rated. I know tons of people - women mostly, but some men - TONS who will catch it when they're off work, or even DVR it. "Oh, that Ellen," they say, "she is just so funny and smart! I just love her!"
And yet they don't want the funny, smart, lovely Ellen to have a happy, legal marriage. #oprahellenportiaderossi
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
I was very happy that they were legally bound, and can receive the same rights and privileges as hetero couples. They seem very much in love, although, truth be told, Ellen seemed to have a lot of therapy-speak mixed in. She seems to have lots more to work on. Portia seemed the more centered of the two, but maybe because she is not in the spotlight as much. That level of fame, esp. connected with the issues surrounding the couple, must be overpowering at times.
Give me fortune instead if fame any time.
11/10/09
To be denied that access because of discriminatory laws is appalling. #oprahellenportiaderossi
11/10/09
11/10/09
In my mind it's a big world and love is rare between people and it's not my place to tell others how to live. It's just not. I'm glad they are happy--I'm glad anyone can find that connection with another soul. We are all just people trying to make our way.
I'm of the opinion that souls don't intrinsically have a gender...and neither does God, who sees our souls. So the whole idea of a person's gender determining worth or wrong by acts or whatnot is moot. What imperfect people have decided to do by setting up societal rules is in and of itself imperfect.
Too crackpot? Maybe...but it keeps my life really peaceful. I'm not driven to expend energy in a negative hurtful way. #oprahellenportiaderossi
11/10/09
11/10/09
I wish gay marriage were legal, because then my partner could get on my health care, and get radiation and pain management, treatment that she needs to fight this cancer effectively. And then, we could have more children, because we won't be worrying about her dying any more... #oprahellenportiaderossi
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
Marriage means so many different things to so many different people.
Anyone uncomfortable with gay marriage is either 1) insecure in their own marriage or 2) has wrapped their entire identity around being a spouse.
Or, they just take the Bible way, WAY too seriously. #oprahellenportiaderossi
11/10/09
Marriage is considered the ultimate validation of binary gender roles, and the goal of all gender conditioning. The entire belief in the infallibility of those gender roles, which is what allows the Patriarchal/Christian/Capitalist ideology to continue to hold power, rests on straight marriage remaining a cultural institution.
If gay marriage were legal & accepted in our culture, and forms of sexuality outside of heterosexuality were treated as equal (or even acknowledged as valid), all of that would be undermined. If being a lesbian is an accepted way of life, then culture doesn't tell a little girl she has to wear a dress when she doesn't want to. A four year old boy who speaks in a feminine voice isn't chastised until he changes it, if growing up to be gay is considered an option. Classes and sports don't have to be split along gender, and can't be, because it is acknowledged that you can't distinguish who is gay and who is straight or assume heterosexuality. So how do you deal with the locker rooms once you admit that members of the same sex may be attracted to one another? Starting from a young age, gender conditioning would become much more difficult and complex.
And if you can't program gender and start the inequality gap young, girls will be given the same opportunities in school as boys, and encouraged to succeed in what have been considered "boy" subjects. Neither gender will feel alienated from the other, which means that once they hit puberty, the straight ones among them will be able to pair off with less of the psychological damage that happens now, and less resentment or mischaracterization of the opposite sex.
Essentially, women will be treated as equals, and cease to be kept down by gender roles that condition them to be stupid, weak, insecure, accomodating, and less ambitious than men. Men will feel less pressure to be dominant, aggressive, competitive, and masculine, or to feel entitled or superior to women.
And that sense of the superiority and dominance of the masculine, and the servitude & nurturing nature of the feminine, is what Christianity is based on. God is the ultimate Man, and people are His servants (a feminine role in contrast). Next in line in the microcosm of that dynamic is the Husband, who is the God to his wife. The wife is stuck in the Mother role, having been convinced that it is her "biological nature" to have children & serve her family. Which distracts her and keeps her powerless, or as powerless as possible, socially, religiously, and politically.
Gender roles extend to almost every aspect of our lives in the world as it is now: We could think of our country as being masculine, and the world as being feminine. We control it, and it serves us, while other countries compete for use of it's life-giving systems and try to claim dominion over it.
In politics, the politicians are masculine, and the voters are feminine. The politicians define the rules and provide the resources, while the voters work within the politician's system and sustain it through their work, while always maintaining a sense of patriotism and commitment to the country that claims to give them everything that they have.
In our economy, the corporations are the men, and the consumers are the women. The corporations may be created by consumers, but they grow to become a set of entities that control the consumer, setting the standards, upholding and reflecting the cultural values and aesthetic, defining what the consumer's life experience is made up of, and providing the consumer with things they believe they need, as long as the consumer gives the corporation their time & money.
All of these things are accepted unquestioningly because the intrinsic nature of gender roles are taken for granted and assumed to be natural laws. If we legalized gay marriage, we would be admitting that the phenomenon of "gay" isn't a psychological illness, a sin, a form of sexual deviance, or a phase. We wouldn't be able to just deny it, ignore it, and exclude it's existence from our perception of reality. We would be forced to face sexuality and actually see it. Right now it's so ingrained in our every action that we're mostly not even aware of it (and those that are, are probably feminists). Gay marriage would offer a contrast & we would have an opportunity to realize how much of our life is not a universal experience like we assumed, but something specific to us, and something that has a cause, and an alternative.
It would be like seeing someone fly, and realizing that it isn't that you can't fly because humans can't fly and that's just the way it is, but that you possibly could fly, you've just never tried because you had been told so plainly, so many times, that it was impossible, and you never thought to try. Right now, it's like there are stories of people flying, and most of us know someone who can do it or who has seen it done, but either they're mistaken, or lying, or those people who can fly are using machines to do it, or there is something morally suspect to them & they can't be trusted. So that it happens doesn't seem to matter because it doesn't have anything to do with us. But if our government suddenly told us that those people really were flying, that it was natural and legitimate, and that they were guaranteed the right to fly just as much as the rest of us are guaranteed the right to walk, then suddenly, it does apply to you. And the entire system is revealed to be built on a lie.
Not only would it fall apart naturally, but once people realized they had been held back, limited, and lied to, and realized the power and freedom they actually had, they'd be pissed off at anyone who tried to control them again. Anti Gay Marriage people know that the lifestyle they live and love is in direct contrast with the fact of homosexuality. They know they're full of shit, but they're comfortable that way. They need everyone else to believe that they are illegitimate, powerless, and seperated from society as a whole, "real" society, because their way of life is so delicately balanced on denial and condemnation of anything that challenges their idiology that it would have nothing to stand on if any other way of viewing reality were considered a possibility.
I'm very sorry that this is so long.
But I've wondered for a really long time what the fuck these people are thinking, because it never seemed to make ANY logical sense. But I think that this is it, and if we can understand it, we can do something about it, because reason doesn't work, and most of them will overlook the constitution and basic human decency when it comes to gay rights so there really isn't hope of an argument that will convince them. The only thing we can do is strike at the vein & try to understand what's underlying the seemingly absurd things these people say & do to protect their paradigm... #oprahellenportiaderossi
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/13/09
11/10/09
What if the government were to no longer issue marriage licenses, but instead grant civil unions to all couples regardless of their sex. Then, if the couple so chooses they may go to their place of worship and be married in the spiritual ritual of their choosing.
At the very least it seems like this could end the "sanctity of marriage" words war; but, I am an unmarried atheist so what do I know? #oprahellenportiaderossi
11/10/09
Words do matter. That's why Ellen and Portia call each other wife rather than partners. They want to be wives, and why can't they be?
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/09/09
We were like eh, after being together for 24 years, erm, why mess with perfection? Marriage won’t change us. We share all finance matters, our names are co-signed to cars and property and I cook, she washes the dishes. I call for the pizza, she picks it up. By some miracle she is on my healthcare plan.
Having said that, being denied the marriage card STILL pisses me off.
So go E and P! #oprahellenportiaderossi
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
We are welded together. #oprahellenportiaderossi
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
My partner and I are planning a "marriage" in August-- I put that word in quotes because we live in PA, where not even civil unions are recognized.
It's important for us to have this ceremony, to declare our love in front of our friends and (hopefully) our family. But legal recognition would be nice, and it's tough not to have it.
Also I hope my mother shows up....
Anyway. Congrats on 24 years! #oprahellenportiaderossi
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
I don't think I need to go into how ridiculous that there should be a vote on whether or not to give a section of the population the same rights as the rest of population. #oprahellenportiaderossi
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
And yet they don't want the funny, smart, lovely Ellen to have a happy, legal marriage. #oprahellenportiaderossi