Good work.
That said, you write that that the press could help Clinton by focusing on the actual issues at hand.
Well, Clinton (and Obama) wants to frame her visit as being all about democracy, being tough on corrupt African leaders, helping defenseless Congolese women (I am with Texas in Africa on this). That may be so, but it obscures the larger rationale for Ms Clinton's visit. Which incidentally is not a secret since State Department officials can't stop wanting to tell the media about it, but the media won't report it. That is two things:
By 2025 the US government expects to import at least 25% of its oil suppliers from African sources–Clinton is visiting three suppliers on this trip: Angola, Nigeria, and Cape Verde. Obama visited a fourth, Ghana (they discovered oil in 2007), a month ago. Right now Nigeria is the 5th largest, and Angola the 6th largest exporters of oil to the United States. Oh, and the US is facing competition from China (who operate by a different, easier, set of rules for foreign investment) for African oil and other resources. [africasacountry.wordpress.com]
This kind of media coverage really burns my ass. And while I know we're all busy and have things to do, I'll tell you that editors and producers do go through viewer/reader feedback e-mails often. They can't read all of the e-mails, but they do read some. So, if you subscribe to/read a paper doing this stuff, e-mail an editor or publisher and tell them how lame it is. If it's a station you watch, e-mail the producer and tell them. E-mail addresses are always on the network/paper's Web sites. You may or may not get a response, but hey, it's something.
great write-up, anna. this situation is so infuriatingly distracting from bigger, more important issues-- which, really, is my least favorite thing about being a woman sometimes-- that it can distract from what i want to say/do/accomplish etc.
many props to hillary. lotta respect for her as a person & a politician.
Several media outlets commented on the 'bad hair day" and/or that she "snapped." And HuffPo found the least flattering picture they could and planted it on the front page, along with the constant cheesecake pictures all over the front page--and today there's a headline saying "US Official Struggles to Explain Clinton Outburst." WTF? I don't need to read it; I'm sure she was just upset about her hair. I know HuffPo isn't mainstream but it's rapidly emerging as the most sexist blog out there.
when the media tries to direct the coverage in this way, i'm convinced they're part of a conspiracy charged with dumbing down the intelligence of americans so we don't question anything anymore.
@msAnthrope: They do it because it's easy and sensational, and they're bad journalists. It makes me SO damn mad. It's easier for TV stations to get viewers to watch and easier to report/put together a story on a Hillary video snippet where she gets angry than to put together a story and get viewers to pay attention to rape/anything in Africa.
And as soon as all of the TV stations were running this, the newspapers had to pick it up so they didn't look like they were "covering it up," if that makes sense. In the end, everyone gets screwed because reporters got lazy. Grrr.
Hillary Clinton has been getting a bad rap about her hair and clothing for over 18 years. Probably back in 1991 Tina Brown was e-mailing her pals on CompuServe with subject lines like, "Hillary Clinton has worse hair than Mrs. Garrett on 'Facts of Life!'" or "HIllary Clinton should wear Doc Martins with that peasant style dress!"
Way to roll with the times Ms Brown.
Is there anyone more smug than Tina Brown and Maureen Dowd? ugh.
That being said, one of our least-favorite newspeople, Ann Curry, was on the ball this morning. After the Today show ran the same piece everyone else is running, she made a point of explaining why it's so important that Clinton in the Congo and what life is like there. Curry has spent a lot of time in Darfur, and I have a feeling she would like to be reporting on the Congo as well.
I don't think her sniping was about her marriage.
I think it was about a reporter asking STUPID QUESTION.
That said, the newborn PR girl in me would have advised Madame Secretary to say something like, Oh, I'm very proud of my husband -- it's wonderful he can keep serving our wonderful nation even though he is no longer in the Oval Office'. Then I would have her re-direct attention onto the issue at hand, saying -- I'm sure he'd like us to focus on blah blah blah blah today.
Reporters can be very easy to pacify in that way.
@NewsBunny: Hooray for PR girls! Though I think a moment of honest, righteous ball-chopping was necessary here, even from a PR standpoint. If you validate the question, you leave it on the table for the next time and Mdm. Secretary's work is too important for that. Questions like this (even if it weren't the ACTUAL question the person asked) are trivial and need to be stopped.
@LaComtesse: While maybe the soft answer would have gone down better in the moment, I too like that Clinton was a little curt. Hopefully people will stop asking her the question now (although, according to Maureen Down, the questioner was actually trying to ask about Obama, but referred to him as "Mr. Clinton").
I'd be super pissed off too if I was in an important position but all people wanted to hear was what my husband thought of the issue. I'd probably reply in the same way, if not in a ruder manner! LOL.
My dad is currently in the Congo doing humanitarian work, and the stuff that he sees and that he tells me is going on is just awful. There are so many great people who live out there and who want/appreciate the help, but things are very corrupt and the Congolese soldiers even turn on each other (in one instance one soldier killed another over a concubine). Many of the non-profits that offer humanitarian aid out there show an extreme lack of leadership, don't train their volunteers well enough and don't prepare them enough for all the secutiry issues that they will face and don't offer any/enough psychological support to the volunteers as well to help them deal with what they see everyday. Meaning that alot of volunteers aren't extending their contracts and many of them are actually terminating their contracts early. It breaks my heart to see the state the Congo is in, especially considering the fact that they are the richest country in AFrica, resource-wise, but are in an extreme state of poverty. :(
It feels like a classic example of changing the subject when the talk gets uncomfortable. I know that it's difficult for me to think/talk about the situation for women in the Congo because that means that I have to face the fact that I share a species with these fuckers who do shit like rape 9 year olds. I don't want to be a person if that's what a person is.
@morninggloria: Bingo! As I said downthread, I think reporters/pundits do this because they know people are uncomfortable. But you just made me think that they are probably also pretty uncomfortable about it themselves.
@morninggloria: Well, let 'em be uncomfortable. That sensation they are feeling, is called guilt, as in "here we are, part of the industrialized world, with all it has to offer, and we're doing nothing to stop these people from raping and killing."
Let's hope the sour taste lingers for a while. Maybe then, people will pay a little more attention to problems other than what the Secretary of State was wearing.
@morninggloria: Between the Birthers, and now the Deathers, and all of the craziness and irrationality on the home front, I've wanted to cash in my human card for a couple of weeks now. When I start thinking about the situation in the Congo, I just want to throw my hands up and shout "I'm out! I'm done! I'm going to start splitting into my own species!"
@morninggloria and @NefariousNewt: You two are right on the money. If we actually talk about it in the public sphere, people might start wondering "gee, that is really HORRIBLE. Why are we letting this go on?" And hello, awkward! What's a country to do when horrific wrongs are wrought on fellow human beings that don't directly impact out national interest?
@morninggloria: The sad thing is that this distraction tactic totally works -- lots of people prefer to read about Hillary's temper/hair than about largescale rape, and they reward coverage about it. When of course what we should be doing with our revulsion is pursuing concrete solutions, not looking away.
@NefariousNewt: "These people"? How, exactly, do we stop "these people" from raping children? Do we castrate them? Do we round them up and ship them to our own prisons, or to Guantanamo? I share your outrage and disgust, and would dearly love to see a functioning justice system in the Congo -- but to assume that we've got some sort of superior moral authority over "these people" -- as if we could ride in there and say "Please stop raping, it's just not civilized" -- is colonialism all over again.
@beppolina1: My implication was not that we have some "moral authority" over the residents of Congo, but that we have not intervened in any constructive way to prevent these things from happening. Diplomacy, aid, education, economic development -- in none of these areas have we spent enough money, or where we have, spent it wisely.
Perhaps it was a poor choice of wording on my part, but I'm not looking to run these African nations -- I'm looking for a way for us to take our money, knowledge, and influence, and use them to get the Congolese to a place where these things do not have to happen anymore.
I recommend Secretary Clinton combat her bad hair days the way I do: by distributing contraceptives, adding peacekeeping forces, prosecuting rapists, and educating the Congolese population. It's a little pricey, but it gets the frizz out in a snap!
Wow - how incredibly repulsive is this? It reflects very badly indeed on these women. And I am not talking about Madame Secretary - who in her defense COULD have spent a fortune (of our money) and traveled with a stylist. Men have. Didn't her HUSBAND get an expensive haircut while on the road?
The sad part is, none of this would have happened, if the translator had simply said "President Obama" as intended by the questioner, and not "President Clinton."
I'm sorry, Maureen and Tina, but you've missed the point entirely: she has a right to be miffed, when her accomplishments as Secretary of State, which are awesome, is overshadowed by her husband's one trip to North Korea. Kudos to Bill, but it's Hillary doing yeoman's work, trying to piece together the shattered remains of America's stature in the world.
This is just another symptom of the major problems with the media in this country. There seems to be this perception on the part of the media that what people want is not coverage of the issues, but incidental coverage of the figures related to the issues. Maybe this is what "people" really want (and by that I mean what pulls ratings), and if so, that is sad. I guess maybe it is just too depressing to think about rape in the Congo, so our helpful reporters and pundits talk about it only glancingly while reporting to us about Hillary Clinton's marriage and hairdo.
@gangey: The Washington Post ran a front page story about rape in the Congo yesterday. No mention of hairdos.
But I know it's easier to complain about the failings of "our helpful reporters and pundits" than actually follow an issue.
Sorry. Hit a nerve. But if you just want to follow the "news" as Tina Brown reports it, please don't confuse it with serious journalism.
@telegramsam: Sorry to offend you... I should have been more specific. What I was complaining about was more of the 24 hour cable news pundits and anchors type of reporting rather than serious journalism, which I do know still exists (especially in print). I also think that if there was no market for the hairdos-type of news-chatter, we wouldn't be getting it, so I don't blame this all on the media. They know what sells, and are selling it to us.
08/12/09
That said, you write that that the press could help Clinton by focusing on the actual issues at hand.
Well, Clinton (and Obama) wants to frame her visit as being all about democracy, being tough on corrupt African leaders, helping defenseless Congolese women (I am with Texas in Africa on this). That may be so, but it obscures the larger rationale for Ms Clinton's visit. Which incidentally is not a secret since State Department officials can't stop wanting to tell the media about it, but the media won't report it. That is two things:
By 2025 the US government expects to import at least 25% of its oil suppliers from African sources–Clinton is visiting three suppliers on this trip: Angola, Nigeria, and Cape Verde. Obama visited a fourth, Ghana (they discovered oil in 2007), a month ago. Right now Nigeria is the 5th largest, and Angola the 6th largest exporters of oil to the United States. Oh, and the US is facing competition from China (who operate by a different, easier, set of rules for foreign investment) for African oil and other resources.
[africasacountry.wordpress.com]
08/12/09
08/12/09
many props to hillary. lotta respect for her as a person & a politician.
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
And as soon as all of the TV stations were running this, the newspapers had to pick it up so they didn't look like they were "covering it up," if that makes sense. In the end, everyone gets screwed because reporters got lazy. Grrr.
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
Way to roll with the times Ms Brown.
08/12/09
That being said, one of our least-favorite newspeople, Ann Curry, was on the ball this morning. After the Today show ran the same piece everyone else is running, she made a point of explaining why it's so important that Clinton in the Congo and what life is like there. Curry has spent a lot of time in Darfur, and I have a feeling she would like to be reporting on the Congo as well.
08/12/09
I think it was about a reporter asking STUPID QUESTION.
That said, the newborn PR girl in me would have advised Madame Secretary to say something like, Oh, I'm very proud of my husband -- it's wonderful he can keep serving our wonderful nation even though he is no longer in the Oval Office'. Then I would have her re-direct attention onto the issue at hand, saying -- I'm sure he'd like us to focus on blah blah blah blah today.
Reporters can be very easy to pacify in that way.
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
You know of any openings in NYC? Message me? :)
08/12/09
My dad is currently in the Congo doing humanitarian work, and the stuff that he sees and that he tells me is going on is just awful. There are so many great people who live out there and who want/appreciate the help, but things are very corrupt and the Congolese soldiers even turn on each other (in one instance one soldier killed another over a concubine). Many of the non-profits that offer humanitarian aid out there show an extreme lack of leadership, don't train their volunteers well enough and don't prepare them enough for all the secutiry issues that they will face and don't offer any/enough psychological support to the volunteers as well to help them deal with what they see everyday. Meaning that alot of volunteers aren't extending their contracts and many of them are actually terminating their contracts early. It breaks my heart to see the state the Congo is in, especially considering the fact that they are the richest country in AFrica, resource-wise, but are in an extreme state of poverty. :(
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
Let's hope the sour taste lingers for a while. Maybe then, people will pay a little more attention to problems other than what the Secretary of State was wearing.
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
Perhaps it was a poor choice of wording on my part, but I'm not looking to run these African nations -- I'm looking for a way for us to take our money, knowledge, and influence, and use them to get the Congolese to a place where these things do not have to happen anymore.
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
08/12/09
What kind of "hair day" she was having had precious little to do with the problems she was trying to bring to light.
08/12/09
I'm sorry, Maureen and Tina, but you've missed the point entirely: she has a right to be miffed, when her accomplishments as Secretary of State, which are awesome, is overshadowed by her husband's one trip to North Korea. Kudos to Bill, but it's Hillary doing yeoman's work, trying to piece together the shattered remains of America's stature in the world.
08/12/09
08/12/09
But I know it's easier to complain about the failings of "our helpful reporters and pundits" than actually follow an issue.
Sorry. Hit a nerve. But if you just want to follow the "news" as Tina Brown reports it, please don't confuse it with serious journalism.
08/12/09
[jezebel.com]
08/12/09
08/12/09