Aw, come on ladies! Fuck this "equality" bullshit. I don't want equality. I want some fucking LIBERATION! I want to be liberated from: double standards cat calls fear of rape sexual violence domestic violence all my friends being rape victims men calling me "sweetie" telling me to smile telling me I just need to get fucked telling me I'm pretty so ain't that enough everybody ignoring women writers only reading the bronte sisters and no other women in high school pay gaps the fact that men can have it all and always have but women have to do it all and always have the women who got arrested in israel last week ALL the women who got raped today this week this year this life rihanna the people who defended chris brown the people who said "i'm not defending chris brown" and then blamed rihanna the fact that there are nurses then there are male-nurses and there's the NBA and the women's NBA people at home depot treating me better when I dress like a boy people at home depot answering my questions to my boyfriend's face because clearly he'll be doing the work having to buy a dog to feel safe my sex offender neighbor ignoring requests that he leave me alone concerned looks i'm a slut cuz i have sex i'm a dyke cuz i'm a feminist i'm a freak cuz i don't want babies i'll be a bad worker cuz i might have a kid...etc.
Equality with men implies men are the standard. Fuck that bullshit. Men are the fucking oppressors! I want liberation from male oppression! Men can have equality with women if they want.
Thanks for posting this Anna, I got so much crap on here for saying that in my position as a college administrator, I and my colleagues are really worried about young men and why they aren't attending college or prepared for college. This got a few people livid. The idea that men not attending college is concerning and I argued damaging to women and education for many reasons was blasphemous for me as a woman on a women's website to comment about. Someone actually said that I would probably want to abort female fetuses to make sure there was a gender balance, on Jezebel, wtf? I keep on trying to tell people that misogyny and patriarchy fucks things up for women and men. Sometimes that's a dangerous/unpopular argument to make to either extreme of the debate on gender equality.
Mostly this strikes me as a lot of whining. I tend to subscribe to a sort of feminism that would find women dominating men a rather... unsatisfactory version of a feminist revolution, since it would mean that dominance is still the sine qua non of interpersonal relationships. I don't meet many feminists who are into that sort of shit. I often think they are the inventions of men.
That said, I feel like feminism still doesn't know enough about women to spend a whole lot of time talking about men. Let's put it this way: there are entire swaths of women that feel completely alienated from feminism, and I don't mean the Sarah Palin set. I mean radical WoC whose voices have been marginalized within the movement, transwomen who have been attacked by theoretical allies who subscribe to a highly static (and largely unfeminist) notion of sex and gender, etc. These are real problems with feminism, and real things I wish we spent more time discussing on a site like Jez. I guess I still feel annoyed when we take long timeouts to talk about men instead.
But most of the time, when this subject comes up, I see a lot of people running around desperate to tell men they don't really hate them like those "other feminists," by which they generally mean women whose work they ill understand, read a newspaper article about once, heard a college professor (mis)interpret as saying all sex is rape, etc. They are the ones being dismissed as "hateful harridans." And that worries me. That I do find distressing. I hate seeing feminism so anxious about its apparent love of men, so to speak.
@PilgrimSoul: I'm one of those people who were initially turned off by feminism in my 20s because of the very angry, anti-male viewpoint I had access to. Granted they were college aged women who had recently found feminism and dove in head first. They were accusatory of differing opinions and lacked the ability to have open discussions about things like this. But, I realized pretty quickly this was not the majority....they do, however tend to be the loudest and most noticeable to outside ears.
Totally agree with your statement "feminism still doesn't know enough about women to spend a whole lot of time talking about men". We have to understand and respect each other fully first and I can't honestly say we are there yet.
Men finally joining together and finding their best path is a good thing IMO. But it is THEIR path to walk not ours.
@PilgrimSoul: Oh I know I've never met you, but I totally love you for saying this.
Especially about how these narratives of evil man-hating feminists are inventions of women, and how the current feminist movement hasn't done enough to reach out to the radical women who have been alienated from mainstream feminism due to class, race, or sex.
I do think it's important for places like Jez to talk about stuff like this, though--in order to talk about how while, yes, the patriarchy does hurt men, the pain the patriarchy brings down upon men is unfathomable in comparison.
Also I am basically as man-hating as a relatively mentally stable person can be. I have no problem saying that men are the problem. And guess what--my boyfriend (shock!) recently told me that the longer he dates me, the more he begins to realize how much the world really does hate women, and how much men really do suck. Once I trapped him with my feminine whiles, he was too distracted by my boobies (or sumthin) to leave, and I made him listen to my rants before I let him have sex with me. And once he got hep to it, he was like, "I knew rape was a problem, always. But it wasn't until you that I realized that Rape Culture is everywhere and once you start to look for it you see it everywhere, and you realize how dangerous and violent the world is for women." So even menfolk can be taught to see it. And even reasonable menfolk, with the right learnin', can see how fucked up male oppression is.
Look at all the feminist love for men and their problems! Not a single instance of "this is But What about the Menz territory"! People expressing genuine concern about how feminism affects men.
There's no 'should' about it, feminism is all about equality with men - but for that to happen, men have to give up some of their power, not lobby for more - duh.
I see these mens groups as nothing more than the growing pains of feminism succeeding - the men who are beginning to feel disempowered are naturally going to start complaining about it. So we should be celebrating the fact that these groups are emerging now - it's proof of progress.
"Equality for males" translates to every man taking a 30% cut in salary, being catcalled on the street, judged on their BMI, advertised to in color-coding, dismissed as irrational and overly emotional, told that they suck at math, and wearing 4" inch heels as a societal expectation.
My feminism is about "equity between genders."
I read a brilliant crit of genderwars in the tech sector recently, where the claim was made that more women in computer science does not mean that men will be losing ground or jobs to women--it just means that there will be more total people in the field. No threat: [infotrope.net]
@betty.black: Well, I definitely don't want men to be: "catcalled on the street, judged on their BMI, advertised to in color-coding, dismissed as irrational and overly emotional, told that they suck at math, and wearing 4" inch heels as a societal expectation", I'd prefer for those things to stop happening to women, instead. I mean, I'm pretty sure you were joking, but just in case.
@betty.black: Oh! I just realized I completely misread your comment. I get it now - you're saying if that's what they want, they can have it. Gotcha. Please ignore the above.
The things I despise about so-called men's rights activists are the same things I despise in other groups' agendas (including feminist): narrow-mindedness, a lack of self-criticism, unwillingness to work for a common ground of discussion.
Personally, I don't have much stock in the "MRA movement," because it largely comes off as a backlash without sound philosophical or social footing. It doesn't stand on it's own as needing "advocates" in my book. Feminism, by contrast, arose out of an irrefutable need for women to be represented in government and society and be afforded the basic human rights of autonomy and agency.
Absolutely, there are concerns that the MRAs raise that need to be addressed, but I find it far more divisive and counterproductive to organize around the sex-differences than to work for the collective good - so many of the issues in question are really human issues first, and gender, ethnic, and socioeconomic issues, second; And this indeed, may be the ultimate lesson of feminism.
@Jack_Burton: I've said it before, but I agree with many of the concerns of MRAs. It is unfair that men are seen as boorish brutes incapable of emotion.
But I disagree with their logic - that stereotype rarely comes from feminism.
I wish that they would work with feminists and try to break down gender stereotypes, instead of sectioning themselves off and bitching about how bad they've got it. It takes all kinds, and lord knows that men don't necessarily have it easy, should they fall outside the expected gendered norms (murder, sexual assault, social ostracism, etc.). But again, not the fault of feminism, which is often actively fighting the stereotypes and the logic used to come to the conclusion that it's okay to murder someone in a "gay panic".
@boxspelunker: You want to find a group of women that really hate men? Conservative women. If you're a guy who doesn't want to toe that line of theirs for macho manhood, watch out.
Meanwhile, I as a feminist stand up for mens' rights and humanity and the people who most often disagree with me are men, because they don't want to give up the perks---the low standards, the degree of power, etc., etc., Amongst other things, being a human being means less power and more work. A lot of guys don't want that. The rewards are kind of intangible.
@boxspelunker: To clarify, I certainly don't mean to include all feminists or all MRAs in my dislike of narrow-minded, polar, and obstructionist individuals, and it is unfair to classify any group of like-minded people as such except in affinity to those very traits themselves. Every group has its' zealots.
Earlier, it is a generalization that I make about MRAs, and perhaps it concurs with a stereotype, but I base my generalization on the observed behaviors and expressed attitudes rather than assumptions and character assassination, and for that generalization, I take sole responsibility.
I think we need to change the phrase: "One can be passionate and still objective." To: "One must be passionate and still objective."
@Ginmar Rienne: Huh. Do radically conservative women like anyone? They hate women, they hate men, they hate anyone in between.
Yeah, being a decent person is less power, more work. That sucks :( I like to think it's all gonna work out and we'll all look back at this and laugh, and be like, "What were you all afraid of? We live in a magical utopia now!"
@boxspelunker: Well, I imagine their existence must suck---but it's chicken or the egg. I think modern conservatives are brought up to oppose things, not support them, so I think they turn to hatred to keep going. It must be exhausting.
It's amazing to me the lengths to which men will go to cling to the low bar for their behavior. If a guy betrays the 'bros before hos' standard, it's amazing what other guys will do, no matter how right he is. He's making them look good, they're making themselves look bad---I don't get it.
@Jack_Burton: Oh, I knew that you weren't saying it in absolutes; I'm sorry if my comment came off that way! I've seen your comments around Jez enough to know that you are a reasonable person :D
I agree with that last statement. We have to care, but we can't let ourselves get so involved with the caring we stop learning.
@Ginmar Rienne: I can understand the "bros before hos", if only it weren't so rude. It's important to keep your friends in your life, and honestly, I think men have a better social pressure to keep friendships alive while in a relationship, whereas women are expected to throw their all into it. That is frustrating. Men are expected to be emotionally distant and a little disengaged, and so they can keep all their friends about them. I wish there were a non-offensive catchy way to say it :)
But yeah, that's a strong one. It works negatively, too, if a man sides with a woman instead of his friends. Instantly, he's "pussy-whipped" or something. I wish it could be on an equal level, especially outside of a romantic relationship. Why can't my male friends side with me without the accusation that I'm sleeping with them? Can't I be right on my own account?
I think it has to be an issue to both sexes, and it is. But most normal guys I know who would never participate in this behavior aren't part of any organization. They can't find comfort in a feminist group, since its for women and most guy groups are too weird or particular for them.
We sort of need just a human group, that essentially works for all humans to have the same rights.
I think there are two issues here getting rolled into one. The first is that, because of the history of privilege, equality really will mean less privilege for men. From the privileged class' vantage point, they are, in a sense, losing power when it gets redistributed more equally among everyone. They're experiencing loss, and even though it's deservedly so, they're reacting against that loss. Flailing, I believe, is the correct term, but I can't say I'm surprised by the reaction. If they're not educated and worldly enough to understand WHY it's beneficial and right for them to forgo their privilege so that everyone can share an equal footing, they're going to perceive the equality movement as a slight. So in some ways, I think it's an education issue, and it's about overcoming the sense of privilege that's been pounded into men's heads, because when you're grounded in privilege and the patriarchy, true equality isn't necessarily an intuitive concept.
The other issue is the very real injustice men -- on an individual by individual basis -- can experience in the justice system. Because the system is in some cases, and for good historical reasons, tuned to favor women, there will inevitably be outlier cases where men are slighted by the justice system. The problem is in treating these cases as pandemic rather than as individual cases where the system fails -- and the system fails everyone from time to time, not just men. But, I think it can feed back into the persecution complex I mentioned above. The trick, I think, is to recognize and not belittle the concerns men express about injustice, but also to emphasize that these injustices occur largely on a case-by-case basis, and pale in comparison to the systemic oppression and injustice committed against women and others disadvantaged by privilege.
Doesn't the title of your earlier post say it all? It isn't the existence of men's rights groups. It is the misguided message you highlighted that so many of us disagree with.
Of course, as a feminist, I believe that men and women are equal. A part of this means that I do want to stop when men are oppressed in our society. Because while there is male privilege, there are men that get abused. There are also things like the high number of African American men who are imprisoned.
Some of the "masculinists" out there make some really thoughtful arguments, and are interested in a lot of the same issues as feminists: domestic violence, family law, gender stereotyping, and the like. In an alternate universe, we could all join forces to work together. But this can't happen as long as "men's rights" activists position themselves in opposition to feminism.
While I believe feminism, or any equality movement, should have an end result where all people are equal, I think many men's rights groups look at changes to gender definitions as rights being taken from them as opposed to us earning some of the privilege they have been holding for approximately ever. I don't have a problem with men getting together for equality of the sexes, I don't have a problem supporting the stop of violence against men or male prison rape for example. I am also on board with insisting men and women get things like maternity leave, and that men can be nurturing fathers for example. But at the same time these groups often want the exact opposite of those things. They want women to recognize housework is their responsibility and crap. Basically my support will come down to the goals of the group, and thinking some men's rights groups are bogus doesn't make me a mean feminazi man-hater.
@itsonreserve: EXACTLY! Men's rights groups shouldn't be allowed to use the term as their name sake. There are men out there who are working to stop patriarchy because it screws them over and the "men's rights" groups are hurting their work.
08:15 PM
Equality with men implies men are the standard. Fuck that bullshit. Men are the fucking oppressors! I want liberation from male oppression! Men can have equality with women if they want.
08:39 PM
But still, if you cast men as The Oppressors, you're not only playing into every feminist stereotype ever, but you're being unfair.
08:42 PM
07:58 PM
05:01 PM
That said, I feel like feminism still doesn't know enough about women to spend a whole lot of time talking about men. Let's put it this way: there are entire swaths of women that feel completely alienated from feminism, and I don't mean the Sarah Palin set. I mean radical WoC whose voices have been marginalized within the movement, transwomen who have been attacked by theoretical allies who subscribe to a highly static (and largely unfeminist) notion of sex and gender, etc. These are real problems with feminism, and real things I wish we spent more time discussing on a site like Jez. I guess I still feel annoyed when we take long timeouts to talk about men instead.
But most of the time, when this subject comes up, I see a lot of people running around desperate to tell men they don't really hate them like those "other feminists," by which they generally mean women whose work they ill understand, read a newspaper article about once, heard a college professor (mis)interpret as saying all sex is rape, etc. They are the ones being dismissed as "hateful harridans." And that worries me. That I do find distressing. I hate seeing feminism so anxious about its apparent love of men, so to speak.
/scatterbrain
05:17 PM
Totally agree with your statement "feminism still doesn't know enough about women to spend a whole lot of time talking about men". We have to understand and respect each other fully first and I can't honestly say we are there yet.
Men finally joining together and finding their best path is a good thing IMO. But it is THEIR path to walk not ours.
05:30 PM
08:05 PM
Especially about how these narratives of evil man-hating feminists are inventions of women, and how the current feminist movement hasn't done enough to reach out to the radical women who have been alienated from mainstream feminism due to class, race, or sex.
I do think it's important for places like Jez to talk about stuff like this, though--in order to talk about how while, yes, the patriarchy does hurt men, the pain the patriarchy brings down upon men is unfathomable in comparison.
Also I am basically as man-hating as a relatively mentally stable person can be. I have no problem saying that men are the problem. And guess what--my boyfriend (shock!) recently told me that the longer he dates me, the more he begins to realize how much the world really does hate women, and how much men really do suck. Once I trapped him with my feminine whiles, he was too distracted by my boobies (or sumthin) to leave, and I made him listen to my rants before I let him have sex with me. And once he got hep to it, he was like, "I knew rape was a problem, always. But it wasn't until you that I realized that Rape Culture is everywhere and once you start to look for it you see it everywhere, and you realize how dangerous and violent the world is for women." So even menfolk can be taught to see it. And even reasonable menfolk, with the right learnin', can see how fucked up male oppression is.
04:53 PM
04:45 PM
Look at all the feminist love for men and their problems! Not a single instance of "this is But What about the Menz territory"! People expressing genuine concern about how feminism affects men.
TAKE THAT AND SHOVE IT, MRAS!
04:31 PM
There's no 'should' about it, feminism is all about equality with men - but for that to happen, men have to give up some of their power, not lobby for more - duh.
I see these mens groups as nothing more than the growing pains of feminism succeeding - the men who are beginning to feel disempowered are naturally going to start complaining about it. So we should be celebrating the fact that these groups are emerging now - it's proof of progress.
05:32 PM
"Equality for males" translates to every man taking a 30% cut in salary, being catcalled on the street, judged on their BMI, advertised to in color-coding, dismissed as irrational and overly emotional, told that they suck at math, and wearing 4" inch heels as a societal expectation.
My feminism is about "equity between genders."
I read a brilliant crit of genderwars in the tech sector recently, where the claim was made that more women in computer science does not mean that men will be losing ground or jobs to women--it just means that there will be more total people in the field. No threat: [infotrope.net]
06:33 PM
07:14 PM
03:58 PM
Personally, I don't have much stock in the "MRA movement," because it largely comes off as a backlash without sound philosophical or social footing. It doesn't stand on it's own as needing "advocates" in my book. Feminism, by contrast, arose out of an irrefutable need for women to be represented in government and society and be afforded the basic human rights of autonomy and agency.
Absolutely, there are concerns that the MRAs raise that need to be addressed, but I find it far more divisive and counterproductive to organize around the sex-differences than to work for the collective good - so many of the issues in question are really human issues first, and gender, ethnic, and socioeconomic issues, second; And this indeed, may be the ultimate lesson of feminism.
04:25 PM
But I disagree with their logic - that stereotype rarely comes from feminism.
I wish that they would work with feminists and try to break down gender stereotypes, instead of sectioning themselves off and bitching about how bad they've got it. It takes all kinds, and lord knows that men don't necessarily have it easy, should they fall outside the expected gendered norms (murder, sexual assault, social ostracism, etc.). But again, not the fault of feminism, which is often actively fighting the stereotypes and the logic used to come to the conclusion that it's okay to murder someone in a "gay panic".
04:59 PM
Meanwhile, I as a feminist stand up for mens' rights and humanity and the people who most often disagree with me are men, because they don't want to give up the perks---the low standards, the degree of power, etc., etc., Amongst other things, being a human being means less power and more work. A lot of guys don't want that. The rewards are kind of intangible.
05:15 PM
Earlier, it is a generalization that I make about MRAs, and perhaps it concurs with a stereotype, but I base my generalization on the observed behaviors and expressed attitudes rather than assumptions and character assassination, and for that generalization, I take sole responsibility.
I think we need to change the phrase: "One can be passionate and still objective." To: "One must be passionate and still objective."
05:54 PM
Yeah, being a decent person is less power, more work. That sucks :( I like to think it's all gonna work out and we'll all look back at this and laugh, and be like, "What were you all afraid of? We live in a magical utopia now!"
#tips
05:59 PM
It's amazing to me the lengths to which men will go to cling to the low bar for their behavior. If a guy betrays the 'bros before hos' standard, it's amazing what other guys will do, no matter how right he is. He's making them look good, they're making themselves look bad---I don't get it.
#tips
06:00 PM
I agree with that last statement. We have to care, but we can't let ourselves get so involved with the caring we stop learning.
#tips
06:20 PM
07:53 PM
But yeah, that's a strong one. It works negatively, too, if a man sides with a woman instead of his friends. Instantly, he's "pussy-whipped" or something. I wish it could be on an equal level, especially outside of a romantic relationship. Why can't my male friends side with me without the accusation that I'm sleeping with them? Can't I be right on my own account?
#tips
07:53 PM
#tips
03:48 PM
It's really, really, REALLY not that fucking hard.
03:28 PM
We sort of need just a human group, that essentially works for all humans to have the same rights.
03:27 PM
03:25 PM
The other issue is the very real injustice men -- on an individual by individual basis -- can experience in the justice system. Because the system is in some cases, and for good historical reasons, tuned to favor women, there will inevitably be outlier cases where men are slighted by the justice system. The problem is in treating these cases as pandemic rather than as individual cases where the system fails -- and the system fails everyone from time to time, not just men. But, I think it can feed back into the persecution complex I mentioned above. The trick, I think, is to recognize and not belittle the concerns men express about injustice, but also to emphasize that these injustices occur largely on a case-by-case basis, and pale in comparison to the systemic oppression and injustice committed against women and others disadvantaged by privilege.
04:14 PM
03:23 PM
Of course, as a feminist, I believe that men and women are equal. A part of this means that I do want to stop when men are oppressed in our society. Because while there is male privilege, there are men that get abused. There are also things like the high number of African American men who are imprisoned.
03:23 PM
03:18 PM
What, do they want me to fight for them then make them a sandwich?
03:17 PM
03:33 PM