Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #defamation more →
Can This Model Really Sue Someone For Calling Her A Ho?
| posts about #defamation more → |
Can This Model Really Sue Someone For Calling Her A Ho? |
01/09/09
Seriously?
What about the Jezebel feature where we all get worked up into a rage by Perez et al's woman-hating? Or the story of that law college message board? Or any attack on a Jezzie editor?
Why does she have to "suck it up"? Is it because she's a model?
01/08/09
01/08/09
Are you the same people who sit on juries and acquit rapists because the victim has a history of lovers or was wearing a short skirt? Because there is some ugly blaming-the-victim going on.
01/08/09
01/08/09
This isn't some site calling out a bunch of NYC girls for being skanky-looking, this site is SPECIFICALLY targeting this woman and this woman alone. I'm sorry, but that's some scary sociopathic shit. He is obviously trying to cause her great personal embarrassment and harm, (although his evidence is hardly skanky- she's just letting loose with friends,) and is hoping that when you google her name, this is what you find.
Also scary, it seems to me that he must know her, because the pictures he has are not stock images or images taken at bars. I'd want to know who in my life was out to get me also, if only to get a restraining order against this obviously unstable person.
01/08/09
01/08/09
This blogger needs to be outed. Fucking coward.
01/08/09
01/08/09
Sorry about your brother. It's such a strange and sad position to be in.
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
That's why i keep reading- you know you can stay in the suite he died in? I am going to do it!
01/08/09
01/08/09
/Not defending the Douchebag site or anything, just the first example that came into my head.
01/08/09
He called Samantha from Sex and the City a skank, and then said the exact words: "what guy would want to be with that? No guy."
Wonder if it's the same dood, he was a jackass, and I almost left in the middle of the date!
01/08/09
I think it's pretty fucking stupid. Shit people say can cause permanent damage, financially and emotionally, and I think you should be held accountable for what you say and write about people. Aren't the lible standards pretty different in Britain? I don't know if it's better, but just allowing people to say whatever they want not matter how damaging because it's their "right" isn't the only option.
01/08/09
01/08/09
It makes me wonder though. What would be the consequences for say, a writer for a major metropolitan newspaper instead of a blog?
01/08/09
This has nothing to do with lawsuits, of course, it just comes down to the culture site owners want for their sites, and most sites seem a-okay with contentious, misogynistic, racist, hateful forums as addendums to their content. I mean, if they don't want the traffic that comes from the 95% of the rest of the world that can't stand to read that shit, I guess that's their business.
01/08/09
From Kate Harding: Because online harassment is still a women's issue.
It's a women's issue because those goals up there-making somebody feel afraid of speaking, making somebody feel powerless to stop what's being done to them, making somebody feel like the only recourse is to shut up and hide out forever-are the goals a whole lot of men still hold dear and work towards for all women.
[kateharding.net]
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/09/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
01/08/09
I just can't figure out which amendment gives everyone the right to sue freely regardless of how stupid it is.
01/08/09
01/08/09