Can someone with more law knowledge than me explain how rape and incest loopholes work? If I need an abortion, can I say that I was raped, or do I have to have filed a police report? Do I need a conviction in court?
And yes, Rachel Maddow, we should revolt. Women should revolt, poor people should revolt, men who give a shit about women should revolt, everyone who isn't poor but believes in de facto reproductive freedom or collective responsibility to care for the less fortunate should fucking revolt. #rachelmaddow
@Hana Maru: I asked this exact question on groupthink. I was pretty confused about how all of this language was defined, especially with rape, and with danger to the mother's health. Does her mental health count? #rachelmaddow
@Jeenzy: "Mother's health" is inclusive of mental health, since Doe v. Bolton in 1973, although Obama said during his campaign that he doesn't agree with it. #rachelmaddow
@Hana Maru: Yes, but I think he meant he doesn't agree with it in its current context -- meaning in the third trimester. My understanding is that this amendment treats all abortions as equal, regardless of trimester. #rachelmaddow
@missworst: The current law(what I think you mean by current context) does allow for health exceptions, including mental health for third trimester abortions. Because he doesn't believe that mental health is as real a health concern as physical (at least for women) he apparantly supports a rollback of Doe v. Bolton.
Now, I don't think that "mental distress" qualifies as the health of the mother. I think it has to be a serious physical issue that arises in pregnancy, where there are real, significant problems to the mother carrying that child to term. Otherwise, as long as there is such a medical exception in place, I think we can prohibit late-term abortions.
This for me is problematic whether it's about third trimester or first. I can't beleve that as a former constitutional law professor, he wasn't clear on the meaning of all this, either.
Obama's done a lot of waffling and fence sitting on women's rights in his career. I think he'll sign any health bill if it *only* sells women down the river, because he wants to get that victory. I can only hope that he proves me wrong this time. #rachelmaddow
@Hana Maru: I agree with you that his statements have been problematic. And, yes I did mean the current law...sorry for the lack of precise language. And, I agree that Obama has done way too much fence sitting on women's rights in general.
However, I just meant that my understanding from what I have seen him say was that he felt this way specifically about late term abortions and that his view was that the government should stay out of the decision earlier in the pregnancy. I could be wrong about this though.
Regardless of any of this, I also have a sneaking suspicion that the entire Democratic Party (Obama included) will view any health care reform as a victory - even if they had to sell out a woman's right to choose to get it. I also hope I am wrong. #rachelmaddow
@missworst: Truly, I don't think Hillary Clinton would be the same in his position, though most male Democrats would be. This is why I was so upset when she was forced out of the primary race. We had the chance, for the first time, to have a President who staunchly believes in, and advocates for rights and freedom for women, especially poor women. #rachelmaddow
@Hana Maru: Thank you for saying this. I was not at all impressed by Obama's stance on abortion during the primaries and on through the election. My feeling of being at best underwhelmed and at worst in fear for my rights hasn't been assuaged since. #rachelmaddow
I already have a letter to my senators planned. One of my senators has done a lot for women's health already. The other probably wouldn't know a labia if it bit him on the ass. This is what I am planning to say. Comments are welcome.
Please see if there is anything that you can do to get the Stupak amendment out of the health care bill. That amendment is a denial of health care to women, especially low-income women, who will need publicly assisted healthcare the most. Abortion is a legal medical procedure that all women should have safe, affordable access to if they want. I don't get to choose where my tax dollars are spent and they are most definitely used on programs and issues I do not want funded (wars, abstinence only sex-ed). A small but vocal group should not be allowed to run away with women's health. #rachelmaddow
Amy Poehler dropping "COMEON!" at the end of her segment was like the best subtle Gob/Will Arnett shout-out ever.
And I hadn't heard about Goldman-Sachs getting the vaccine, but I would LOOOOOVE to hear the CDC's reasoning behind it. I go to school with 30,000 people under the age of 24 (a high-risk population) and we can't find any vaccine, but some rich fucks on Wall Street get it? REALLY? #clips
The question that I'd like to pose to those smug motherfuckers is this: what happens when a woman who gets pregnant and chooses to keep the baby then faces a devastating diagnosis during a routine ultrasound and chooses to terminate the pregnancy? Or a woman who has gone through the heartbreak of infertility finally gets pregnant through ART procedures, but needs to selectively reduce the number of embryos in order to hold onto the pregnancy at all?
My crappy insurance currently covers abortion for those reasons (and sluttly slut sex) -- but you're telling me I'm a slatternly whore for having procreational sex within the bonds of marriage and don't deserve coverage of that facet of my health anymore?
@howdybeep (runs with monkey wrenches): The people you are asking those questions would tell you to keep the pregnancy until "god" terminates it. They don't believe in devastating diagnosis. jesus could come through and save the baby at the end. Duh. #rachelmaddow
@veronykah: " jesus could come through and save the baby at the end."
That's right. And if you die in the meantime, don't worry! God says your husband should marry your sister and make her raise your kids. So it's all good. #rachelmaddow
It's sad but that actually passes as valid and intelligent political discourse today. You can refuse medical treatment for your child and allow them to die a slow painful death, but underage rape victims can't get an abortion in many states without their parents consent, even if it was a case of incest. #rachelmaddow
@howdybeep (runs with monkey wrenches): There's also a really unpleasant history in some parts of American christianity (the far-right, crazycakes parts, one hopes) of believing that these things are trials set before you by God in order to teach you an important lesson, so you shouldn't try to dodge them by not giving birth to a baby who might, say, live for an hour in horrible pain. It goes back to the early Puritans, who believed that monstrous births were sent from God to tell you you'd sinned. No, seriously - some of the first Puritan ministers would dig up miscarried fetuses from graveyards to prove that their mothers were no longer right with God. #rachelmaddow
purpleshoes reminds everyone to take typing breaks and stretch, ow was starred
purpleshoes reminds everyone to take typing breaks and stretch, ow was unstarred
@Ineedmorecowbell: I believe in the case of Anne Hutchinson it was because both parents associated with that loud-mouthed midwife, so the disdain was pretty widespread. I recommend The Wordy Shipmates by Sarah Vowell for some skimming on the topic, if you're curious! #rachelmaddow
howdybeep (runs with monkey wrenches) promoted this comment
purpleshoes reminds everyone to take typing breaks and stretch, ow was starred
purpleshoes reminds everyone to take typing breaks and stretch, ow was unstarred
I got in an argument with my boyfriend about this last night. Granted, we both had a buzz on and I was downright pissy about the amendment.
His view is that if it needed to happen to get this bill passed, so be it. Of course, he couldn't leave it at that (I can begrudgingly get behind that) and had to add that the government shouldn't have to pay for that procedure.
Now, the dude is pro-choice all the way, I just don't think he gets it. What about all the other bullshit the government pays for? What about the fact that this amendment will disproportionately impact women with lower incomes?
"Does the government pay for abortions now?" he asked.
WTF? Fuck, how am I even dating you??? #rachelmaddow
@Penny: Yeah, I got into a similar incident with my boyfriend last night. He said he didn't think the taxpayers should cover that and I said (as I also replied last night to the other article), "As a taxpayer, I'd rather pay for someone's $300 abortion than her 8+ children."
@Copper: That was my exact response. Not only that, but tell me, does Medicare pay for Rxs like Viagra? Rxs that, frankly, I think are non-essential?
When he asked me if the government pays for abortions now and I said no, and he got that smug look on his face, I just shut down. I was done.
Who the fuck cares? The government doesn't pay for a lot of shit they should be paying for now. Of course, at least 50% of my taxpayer dollars are funneling into shitty wars and bailing out companies run by assholes, but I suppose that's moot?
He thinks that because PP offers abortions, the ladies are A-OK.
@Penny: "Does the government pay for abortions now?" Um, no, the gov't doesn't pay for a LOT of medical procedures that it could/should cover, for a whole fucking lot of people—that's the whole fucking point of trying to enact health care reform. Ooh, I'd be mad at him, too. #rachelmaddow
What makes me even more angry is that he just likes to argue, and I think he knows he's probably blowing smoke out of his ass. I wish his sister (a doctor) had been around. #rachelmaddow
@Penny: Not to be too presumptive, but it sounds like you're both talking past each other -- looking at the bullet point summary of what you're saying and what he's saying, it sounds like you've both got a deeper underlying logic for why it is/isn't an unambiguously good idea that you're having trouble clearly articulating to each other.
It sounds like the general direction his mind is going in is "The government getting directly involved in funding abortions might create more problems than it solves". Not so much directly opposed, but focusing on all the ways full government coverage might backfire. There are some good reasons to be wary; this will give pro-lifers a new 'endless battle' to fight, one that's far more feasible than overturning Roe v. Wade and ultimately shifts our politics in a more pro-life direction.
There's also a big difference between the restrictions on how you spend your medical insurance subsidy (which will likely not survive the conference committee) and restrictions on how the 'government plan' operates, in terms of how agnostic the federal government is on a very thorny question.
Also, considering that on its face this won't restrict abortion access for those who already have it, it's pretty fair to argue it was 'worth' these provisions (Which, again, likely won't last) to get the bill passed (On a very, very narrow vote), with all the good it'll do.
That's just his side of things, or at least, the points it sounds like he's sort of 'getting at' but not really expressing fluently.
From your side of things, you've got a number of excellent points, and I'm guessing you two have more common ground than you think; it just sounds like both of you struck an initial tone that has you rubbing each other the wrong way, and just sort of jumping around from one "Well what about ______, *huh*?!" to another. Sounds like a day off from arguing it, and then both of you approaching it in a less confrontational way, will go a long way toward restoring your boyfriend's pro-choice bona-fides in your eyes.
@CrapCommentFromADude: I'm still unclear on how you think the undemocratic agrarian oligarchy, er, I mean, the senate, won't get hard-ons up to their chins over this amendment. What senate committee do you see taking it out? Are you talking reconciliation? And if it doesn't get removed, Bob Nelson won't support it. #rachelmaddow
@Penny: Look the government hasn't paid for health insurance up to this point, so in what context would they be paying for abortions? It doesn't matter that the government doesn't cover abortions right now, because there is no context in which it could do that, is there (someone correct me if I'm wrong)? Is he talking about not funding programs overseas that carry out abortions? What, exactly, is he talking about?
The point is that if the government is going to fund health care in this country, it should be comprehensive -- and that includes covering abortions. I mean, I'm sure I could think up a lot of things that I think are unnecessary that will be covered by a gov't run health care plan. And it may be that I find some of those things morally problematic. But I also have a big enough brain to understand that a gov't run health care plan has to cover a lot of people besides myself and that my morality cannot dictate who or what that plan covers. #rachelmaddow
@waitinformyman: Ok, I just looked up the Hyde Amendment...sorry for my ignorance on the issue. Still, just because the gov't does not now use federal funds to pay for abortions doesn't mean such funds should be eliminated from the health care bill.
Abortion is still legal in this country. What restrictions on federal funds (even the ones now in place) now does is essentially make abortions inaccessible to many different women, even though they are still legal. That should not be the goal of this health care plan. Just because there is no federal funding for abortions now does not make it ok to continue banning federal funds for abortions. I don't see the logic of your boyfriend's thinking.
I certainly hope that Rachel Maddow is right, and that this amendment is removed from the bill when the time comes. #rachelmaddow
@CrapCommentFromADude: "this won't restrict abortion access for those who already have it"
There are some serious problems with this statement.
For example, my sister is a modern dancer and choreographer. She's an artist. In my opinion, artists are necessary for any culture to be considered worthwhile; without the artists, America would basically be less a country and more a landmass full of people who follow the same rules. Without artists, we're just animals with guns.
But my sister has to work at a shitty restaurant so she can have health insurance, which fucks her art up (because of scheduling conflicts, mostly). If she could work at, say, a small yoga studio or a dance school, she'd be a lot better off in terms of her dancing, but most of those places don't have health insurance coverage. If she could get insurance from the government, she could spend her time working at something far more worthwhile. But she couldn't get abortion coverage (which she has now). So, besides the ethical issues involved with the fuck 'em attitude our government has towards women and their bodies and their health, there are actual material consequences as well. Now my sister has to continue working at a shitty chain restaurant with a cadre of men who constantly harass her, and deal with shitty managers who give her hell about scheduling her work hours around her performance schedule. #rachelmaddow
@Penny: I'm in Mississippi, there isn't one single Planned Parenthood within 50 miles of me and only one abortion clinic in the ENTIRE STATE. #rachelmaddow
OMG I've only watched the first clip and I am in LOVE with her. My boyfriend (who I suspect might actually be a 12 year old girl) loves her song about being the nerd in high school. I am totally going to show him these clips when he gets home.
It's also so cute, she reminds me of my really super tall and lanky friend Kaitlin when she was in high school, like she doesn't quite know how to stand or handle her body yet. So adorable. #clips
@Penny: The monologue was my favorite of all of them, although the Twilight one was pretty funny. But seriously, could not. stop. giggling. during her "musical monologue." #clips
So, it totally wouldn't actually kill them to hire another black actor or even a black actress, but in the Bunny Business clip I was struck by what a pretty girl Kenan makes. #clips
That "Firelight" digital short is the first time in ages that SNL has made me laugh out loud. But mostly because I hate "Twilight," and I like to make fun of it. :)
@Kivrin: Did you notice how she kept putting her hair behind her ear? I never caught on to that in Twilight until my boyfriend told me how much it annoyed him. He's doing to crack up when I show him this clip. #clips
That was one of the best episodes of SNL in ages. Taylor Swift isn't an actress (yet) but it seemed like she was genuinely having fun and that made it all the more enjoyable to watch. I was ecstatic to see Amy back for Weekend Update but her appearance was much too short (why not just all of Weekend Update?) and unsteady. Also, that Sarah McLachlan sketch was HILARIOUS. The Scared Straight was one of the best skits I had seen in a while even though Taylor really didn't participate. Still, Taylor Swift really impressed me. All in all it was a great show.
P.S. I had always thought that the tabloids had made up her relationship with one of the Jonas Brothers or I at least thought it wasn't very serious one. Basically, last night I discovered that I'm completely out of touch with the tweenage gossip. After she mentioned that she's dating "the hot werewolf from Twilight" I was like, "There was a werewolf in Twilight?!" #clips
@JessickerFletcher: "The Scared Straight was one of the best skits I had seen in a while..." Honest question: what's funny about rape? The jokes weren't meant to eviscerate the perpetrators, they were making fun of the victims. #clips
@tallgirl-in-heels: Honestly, I don't really remember the rape jokes (now that I think about it their were some immature prison rape jokes but they didn't really stick with me). I just cracked up at Kenan's 80's movies references and Taylor Swift as a dude with blonde cornrows. #clips
@JessickerFletcher: Fair enough I guess, but I recall a good half of the skit being prison rape jokes. Rape is still so prevalent, and the treatment of rape victims is so abominably poor, and jokes that denigrate victims and minimize the crime add to the problem. I know I'm sounding preachy, but I believe it's important to think about whether we're contributing - even in a small way - to a greater societal problem by laughing at these kinds of jokes. #clips
03:57 AM
11/08/09
11/08/09
And yes, Rachel Maddow, we should revolt. Women should revolt, poor people should revolt, men who give a shit about women should revolt, everyone who isn't poor but believes in de facto reproductive freedom or collective responsibility to care for the less fortunate should fucking revolt. #rachelmaddow
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
Now, I don't think that "mental distress" qualifies as the health of the mother. I think it has to be a serious physical issue that arises in pregnancy, where there are real, significant problems to the mother carrying that child to term. Otherwise, as long as there is such a medical exception in place, I think we can prohibit late-term abortions.
This for me is problematic whether it's about third trimester or first. I can't beleve that as a former constitutional law professor, he wasn't clear on the meaning of all this, either.
Obama's done a lot of waffling and fence sitting on women's rights in his career. I think he'll sign any health bill if it *only* sells women down the river, because he wants to get that victory. I can only hope that he proves me wrong this time. #rachelmaddow
11/08/09
However, I just meant that my understanding from what I have seen him say was that he felt this way specifically about late term abortions and that his view was that the government should stay out of the decision earlier in the pregnancy. I could be wrong about this though.
Regardless of any of this, I also have a sneaking suspicion that the entire Democratic Party (Obama included) will view any health care reform as a victory - even if they had to sell out a woman's right to choose to get it. I also hope I am wrong. #rachelmaddow
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
Please see if there is anything that you can do to get the Stupak amendment out of the health care bill. That amendment is a denial of health care to women, especially low-income women, who will need publicly assisted healthcare the most. Abortion is a legal medical procedure that all women should have safe, affordable access to if they want. I don't get to choose where my tax dollars are spent and they are most definitely used on programs and issues I do not want funded (wars, abstinence only sex-ed). A small but vocal group should not be allowed to run away with women's health. #rachelmaddow
11/08/09
And I hadn't heard about Goldman-Sachs getting the vaccine, but I would LOOOOOVE to hear the CDC's reasoning behind it. I go to school with 30,000 people under the age of 24 (a high-risk population) and we can't find any vaccine, but some rich fucks on Wall Street get it? REALLY? #clips
11/08/09
My crappy insurance currently covers abortion for those reasons (and sluttly slut sex) -- but you're telling me I'm a slatternly whore for having procreational sex within the bonds of marriage and don't deserve coverage of that facet of my health anymore?
Motherfuckers indeed. #rachelmaddow
11/08/09
11/08/09
That's right. And if you die in the meantime, don't worry! God says your husband should marry your sister and make her raise your kids. So it's all good. #rachelmaddow
11/08/09
It's sad but that actually passes as valid and intelligent political discourse today. You can refuse medical treatment for your child and allow them to die a slow painful death, but underage rape victims can't get an abortion in many states without their parents consent, even if it was a case of incest. #rachelmaddow
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
His view is that if it needed to happen to get this bill passed, so be it. Of course, he couldn't leave it at that (I can begrudgingly get behind that) and had to add that the government shouldn't have to pay for that procedure.
Now, the dude is pro-choice all the way, I just don't think he gets it. What about all the other bullshit the government pays for? What about the fact that this amendment will disproportionately impact women with lower incomes?
"Does the government pay for abortions now?" he asked.
WTF? Fuck, how am I even dating you??? #rachelmaddow
11/08/09
He quickly changed his tune. #rachelmaddow
11/08/09
When he asked me if the government pays for abortions now and I said no, and he got that smug look on his face, I just shut down. I was done.
Who the fuck cares? The government doesn't pay for a lot of shit they should be paying for now. Of course, at least 50% of my taxpayer dollars are funneling into shitty wars and bailing out companies run by assholes, but I suppose that's moot?
He thinks that because PP offers abortions, the ladies are A-OK.
He is so on my shit list right now. #rachelmaddow
11/08/09
11/08/09
What makes me even more angry is that he just likes to argue, and I think he knows he's probably blowing smoke out of his ass. I wish his sister (a doctor) had been around. #rachelmaddow
11/08/09
11/08/09
It sounds like the general direction his mind is going in is "The government getting directly involved in funding abortions might create more problems than it solves". Not so much directly opposed, but focusing on all the ways full government coverage might backfire. There are some good reasons to be wary; this will give pro-lifers a new 'endless battle' to fight, one that's far more feasible than overturning Roe v. Wade and ultimately shifts our politics in a more pro-life direction.
There's also a big difference between the restrictions on how you spend your medical insurance subsidy (which will likely not survive the conference committee) and restrictions on how the 'government plan' operates, in terms of how agnostic the federal government is on a very thorny question.
Also, considering that on its face this won't restrict abortion access for those who already have it, it's pretty fair to argue it was 'worth' these provisions (Which, again, likely won't last) to get the bill passed (On a very, very narrow vote), with all the good it'll do.
That's just his side of things, or at least, the points it sounds like he's sort of 'getting at' but not really expressing fluently.
From your side of things, you've got a number of excellent points, and I'm guessing you two have more common ground than you think; it just sounds like both of you struck an initial tone that has you rubbing each other the wrong way, and just sort of jumping around from one "Well what about ______, *huh*?!" to another. Sounds like a day off from arguing it, and then both of you approaching it in a less confrontational way, will go a long way toward restoring your boyfriend's pro-choice bona-fides in your eyes.
Or I could be completely wrong! #rachelmaddow
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
The point is that if the government is going to fund health care in this country, it should be comprehensive -- and that includes covering abortions. I mean, I'm sure I could think up a lot of things that I think are unnecessary that will be covered by a gov't run health care plan. And it may be that I find some of those things morally problematic. But I also have a big enough brain to understand that a gov't run health care plan has to cover a lot of people besides myself and that my morality cannot dictate who or what that plan covers. #rachelmaddow
11/08/09
Abortion is still legal in this country. What restrictions on federal funds (even the ones now in place) now does is essentially make abortions inaccessible to many different women, even though they are still legal. That should not be the goal of this health care plan. Just because there is no federal funding for abortions now does not make it ok to continue banning federal funds for abortions. I don't see the logic of your boyfriend's thinking.
I certainly hope that Rachel Maddow is right, and that this amendment is removed from the bill when the time comes. #rachelmaddow
11/08/09
There are some serious problems with this statement.
For example, my sister is a modern dancer and choreographer. She's an artist. In my opinion, artists are necessary for any culture to be considered worthwhile; without the artists, America would basically be less a country and more a landmass full of people who follow the same rules. Without artists, we're just animals with guns.
But my sister has to work at a shitty restaurant so she can have health insurance, which fucks her art up (because of scheduling conflicts, mostly). If she could work at, say, a small yoga studio or a dance school, she'd be a lot better off in terms of her dancing, but most of those places don't have health insurance coverage. If she could get insurance from the government, she could spend her time working at something far more worthwhile. But she couldn't get abortion coverage (which she has now). So, besides the ethical issues involved with the fuck 'em attitude our government has towards women and their bodies and their health, there are actual material consequences as well. Now my sister has to continue working at a shitty chain restaurant with a cadre of men who constantly harass her, and deal with shitty managers who give her hell about scheduling her work hours around her performance schedule. #rachelmaddow
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
It's also so cute, she reminds me of my really super tall and lanky friend Kaitlin when she was in high school, like she doesn't quite know how to stand or handle her body yet. So adorable. #clips
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
I thought she did a great job last night. It was definitely the best episode this season. #clips
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
On another note: Kenan makes an incredibly beautiful woman which is always a good option. Also, I think I would by the Bunny Business CD. #clips
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
P.S. I had always thought that the tabloids had made up her relationship with one of the Jonas Brothers or I at least thought it wasn't very serious one. Basically, last night I discovered that I'm completely out of touch with the tweenage gossip. After she mentioned that she's dating "the hot werewolf from Twilight" I was like, "There was a werewolf in Twilight?!" #clips
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09