I heard about this business of changing the law in Massachusetts. WTH? So you change it first to suit your needs, and now you want to change it back because it doesn't suit you anymore? It made me really mad, especially because it IS a needed law that should be passed on all states (we don't have that in GA).
Senators are elected by the people. If we lose a Senator, then we should elect another one, not have the Governor of the state appoint one for us without our input (Blago, anyone? The whole Caroline Kennedy fiasco in NY? Zell Miller?).
Yes, in this case it is unfortunate that it happened in the middle of the health care reform and to its biggest advocate, but I really, really dislike knee-jerk reactions that mess around with elections. This must be done the right way.
I'm trying to look for the segment where Rachel Maddow exposed this argument during her show in a better way than me.
@Little Green Frog (Wise Latina): I don't think there's anyone saying that an appointment rather than election will happen - but in Massachusetts, the state law mandates a five month interim period. What Kennedy proposed will not change elections - it will simply allow an interim Senator to represent Massachusetts on the Senate floor while the special state election is held. I, as a Massachusetts resident, do not want to be underrepresented, especially when something as important as the health care reform is up for debate. I agree with the sentiment that it's wrong to change the laws and then change them back, but blame that on the existence of a Republican governor with a super-majority of Democrats in the state legislature. They didn't want Romney to have any opportunities to usurp them.
@royaume de coeur: I agree that 5 months is a long to time to be underrepresented, but now that the state legislature is looking at changing that law, who knows what else they will do in addition to allow for an interim replacement. That is the "scary" part to me.
@Spaceman Bill Leah: here's a completely off topic story about John Kerry: in 1976 then Lt Gov John Kerry spoke at my sister's high school graduation. I remember sitting in the stands at only 8 years old thinking 'who IS this douchebag"
Over 30 years later, my opinion of him hasn't changed.
Just a note of correction: It's Deval Patrick, not Duval.
In Mass. and on Beacon Hill (I work on the Hill) there's been discussion of Mass. Attorney General Martha Coakley, a strong advocate for social justice, taking Kennedy's seat. She would be a great asset to Congress and would follow in Ted's footsteps in fighting for the disenfranchised.
Deval's much more of a managerial type - I don't think he's got the charisma or stubbornness to fight the battles on Capitol Hill.
@royaume de coeur: Oh that's kind of cool. I always liked Martha Coakley. I don't live in Mass anymore, but I understand Patrick's not too popular there these days so i don't know if he could get elected.
@royaume de coeur: That would be perfect, and she'd probably be elected pretty easily, I just hope they can do it VERY quickly. Deval might want it though because he certainly won't be re-elected as governor and this way he can be closer to BO.
@stacyinbean: Deval is on the SCOTUS list, and he could also get a job in justice. Getting beaten badly in a special election would harm those chances. Hopefully he's smart enough not to run.
To be brutally frank, nothing changes, save one of the greatest advocates for change is gone. The House and Senate are still filled with competing bills, there is still savage and vocal criticism of reform, partisanship in Congress, and a White House back on its heels.
What has to come from this is a re-dedication to the cause. The White House has to come out hammering; time for the LBJ treatment. Cajole, harass, glad-hand, stiff-arm, talk, talk, and talk some more, build consensus, call in favors, make threats... whatever it takes.
@NefariousNewt a.k.a. General Awesomesauce: yeah, I have to say, I have lost all hope of a meaningful health care bill being passed and if anything Ted Kennedy's death made it seem even more hopeless. But let me also say, I never really thought he'd be back once he was diagnosed, a family member is dying of the same type of cancer and I know how quick and horrible it is.
@NefariousNewt a.k.a. General Awesomesauce: Unfortunately, the advocate was gone months ago. I was hoping he could make it to Washington for the vote, but he could no longer be the advocate he was.
Are any of the Boston Jezzies going to the "wake" at the JFK Library tonight? I really want to go and pay my respects, but I know it is going to be a mad house.
@Sputnik_Sweetheart: I think I might try for tomorrow morning's instead, although I also anticipate that the lines will be INSANE. If you work in the city, his motorcade will be going through this afternoon passing places in Boston that meant a lot to him (Faneuil Hall, state house, etc), so keep an eye out!
@Sputnik_Sweetheart: I would like to, but think it'll be too crowded to be able to see anything. It'll be on the local news, so I plan on just watching it on tv.
@Sputnik_Sweetheart: Also - I don't know if you've ever been to the JFK library, but it's not really set up for that kind of volume of people. I went to UMass Boston, right next door and there's very little parking and just a long narrow windy road to the library. Of course I graduated in 1994, so things might be better now.
@Penny: But that may be the problem -- I don't want a bill passed simply because it would honor Ted Kennedy. I want a health care reform bill that makes sense and covers all Americans -- that would honor Ted Kennedy.
@NefariousNewt a.k.a. General Awesomesauce: ITA. Just slapping Ted Kennedy's name on a crappy health care bill would be a disgrace to his memory - he'd always been a supporter of universal health care and REAL reform, not empty gestures
The obstacle that Hillary has in the Senate is that she is a relative newcomer there. She can't do as much as the old guard. She doesn't have the seniority of many people, and so it would be years before she would get the choice committees. She could make an immediate diference as SOS. I personally don't think that she wanted the VP spot because if Obama had lost with her on the ticket, it would have hurt her chances in 2012 since it would have looked like she couldn't bring in the votes.
@mizz2bee: if she goes back to the Senate, there is talk she wants to challenge Harry Reid as majority leader. But the Senate doesn't care that she got 18 million votes in the primaries: they care that she's in the middle of her second term and has never been a committee chair. If she is SOS, she gets the big plane, she gets a big staff, she can send Bill off as the special representative to somewhere, she can entertain at her beautiful house. Meanwhile, Obama still has Biden and whomever he choses as NSC advisor, and he can let her do her thing.
The only problem is Bill: would he try to act as SOS himself, speak for her, and get her and Obama in trouble? You can't control him.
Sorry to threadjack, but Rachel Maddow totally just referenced Spencer Ackerman and if I don't type that out, I won't remember to mention it during CH tomorrow.
i'd also like to note that a part of obamas economic plan is offering tax breaks ONLY for companies who do not outsource and close domestic offices. auto makers, take note!
This is taken from a Time article, and explains why GM has us all fucked:
"But ultimately, whether GM is dead or alive, the taxpayers are on the hook for billions, for everything from lost tax revenues to higher unemployment costs to taking over GM's pension obligations. The decision that Washington has to make is whether we pay for GM's survival or for its funeral."
So we either pay to keep everyone employed, or we pay when everyone becomes unemployed. Sounds awesome.
@Crabby Cakes is SOLID AS BARACK!: Yeah, I haven't worked out in, uh, I can't remember and so every day I'm all "today's the day I will do a workout!" and yet? Today was so crappy that I'm all eff that noise, it's time for alcohol and crap food.
All I need is a giant bowl and this day will be THE BEST.
im starting to think i should start a business, but kinda knowing it will fail, continue to operate under the policies that lead to my business losing money and not being competitive, then ill be like, "yo what up guys wheres my billions".
@anonymiss: Anonymiss, demanding money is NO WAY to get money from the government! You have to be WAY more whiny about it, use completely irrelevant statistics and parade them around as fact and scare the American populace into thinking this is the only answer!
08/27/09
Senators are elected by the people. If we lose a Senator, then we should elect another one, not have the Governor of the state appoint one for us without our input (Blago, anyone? The whole Caroline Kennedy fiasco in NY? Zell Miller?).
Yes, in this case it is unfortunate that it happened in the middle of the health care reform and to its biggest advocate, but I really, really dislike knee-jerk reactions that mess around with elections. This must be done the right way.
I'm trying to look for the segment where Rachel Maddow exposed this argument during her show in a better way than me.
08/27/09
[www.msnbc.msn.com]
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
Over 30 years later, my opinion of him hasn't changed.
08/27/09
08/27/09
In Mass. and on Beacon Hill (I work on the Hill) there's been discussion of Mass. Attorney General Martha Coakley, a strong advocate for social justice, taking Kennedy's seat. She would be a great asset to Congress and would follow in Ted's footsteps in fighting for the disenfranchised.
Deval's much more of a managerial type - I don't think he's got the charisma or stubbornness to fight the battles on Capitol Hill.
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
What has to come from this is a re-dedication to the cause. The White House has to come out hammering; time for the LBJ treatment. Cajole, harass, glad-hand, stiff-arm, talk, talk, and talk some more, build consensus, call in favors, make threats... whatever it takes.
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
I think the problem, respectfully, is that he can't be the only one doing it. I don't care how many miles a day you run, that way lies burnout.
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
I thought it was sweet.
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
08/27/09
11/14/08
11/14/08
The only problem is Bill: would he try to act as SOS himself, speak for her, and get her and Obama in trouble? You can't control him.
11/13/08
/threadjack
11/13/08
11/13/08
11/13/08
11/14/08
Me too, me too!
11/13/08
11/13/08
11/13/08
"But ultimately, whether GM is dead or alive, the taxpayers are on the hook for billions, for everything from lost tax revenues to higher unemployment costs to taking over GM's pension obligations. The decision that Washington has to make is whether we pay for GM's survival or for its funeral."
So we either pay to keep everyone employed, or we pay when everyone becomes unemployed. Sounds awesome.
11/13/08
11/13/08
11/13/08
11/13/08
11/13/08
11/13/08
All I need is a giant bowl and this day will be THE BEST.
11/13/08
11/13/08
11/13/08
IM GONNA BE RICH BITCH!
11/13/08
11/13/08