True confessions: I have actually worn the mary-kateandashley makeup. They made a really kick ass gold metallic eye shadow pencil that I used to rock in high school. #zoekravitz
@Zombie Ms. Skittles: I still have a couple of their eyeshadows. I've had them for years and should probably toss them, but now it's like they're a relic or something ... #zoekravitz
@Zombie Ms. Skittles: I have too! I bought a bunch of it at once, like 5 years ago, because they had things packaged together and then they were buy one get one free, and they were cheap. It was good makeup, especially the lip gloss. I used everything until they were done and I still have the dark brown eyeliner.
It is a little embarrassing. One of my friends peeked in my makeup bag and was like "I didn't know you were a Mary Kate and Ashley fan" #zoekravitz
I have very strong opinions about Eileen Fisher. I worked in a boutique that sold her things when I was in college and, regardless of the "image" she's going for (fuck, it's fashion), she IS a godsend to a lot of women. If you can sell a cute pair of linen drawstring pants in XS to a 19 year old like me and dress a size 22 who is 50 and a professional, you're doing something right.
Fisher's ads feature a pretty wide range of women (ages, races and yes, sizes). She doesn't need to target the plus-size market because they already flock to her.
Also, Rosie bugs me. Does Donna Karan go for a plus size image? No. #ragtrade
@Penny: It's not my kind of style, but Eileen Fisher clothing seems to be very well made. Many of the brands catering to plus sizes seem to be very cheaply made.
If I go to a higher end department store and look at plus sizes, the style is very dowdy and matronly. There are young, plus size women who have the money to buy nice things.
@Penny: I agree about the designs -- I actually love some of Eileen Fisher's pieces. (Most of them I stole from my mum, but you know.)
However, it is true the company is consciously chasing a younger "hipper" customer -- they certainly collaborated with a Times article stating same -- and that strikes me as foolish.
And if Fisher herself said what O'Donnell reports, to her very face, that is just downright mean.
@Jenna: I agree. I'm not one to ditch good design willy nilly, but Fisher's rudeness to a happy, loyal customer tells me I shouldn't express any more gratitude to Eileen Fisher with my hard-earned money because clearly my fat behind insults her business.
Famous person talking about and wearing your clothes = great advertising. Famous person telling fans how rude and ungrateful clothing designer is = bad advertising. That's how social media works, lady. #zoekravitz
@Penny: "...And then, he's gonna make her Lady Wintour, Viscountess of 4 Times Square, and Marchioness of the Leaping Brazilians, and he'll take her as his vassal for Long Island, and then they'll all eat pizza and cupcakes." #zoekravitz
I was reading through the UK Vogue with Georgia May on the cover last night. It's literally the first time I have flipped through a magazine and felt frightfully old. #ragtrade
Given the fashion industry's generally overwhelming insensitivity with regards to racial issues (among many, many others), I'm NOT going to give French Vogue the benefit of the doubt. I remember an American Vogue spread from the mid-to-late '90s that featured a model of Euro descent covered in bronzer and wearing 'tribal'-inspired clothing (fringed leggings, feathered headdresses, etc.) This feels like a slightly subtler version of that.
And I don't think the "But we're French!" excuse flies anymore. It's not like France is hermetically sealed off from the rest of the world or doesn't have its own racial problems. I'm sorry to say that from my perspective, Europeans seem to be behind Americans in terms of racial sensitivity. I still clearly remember the slanty eyes pictures of the Spanish Olympic basketball team and the repeated, lame Berlusconi jokes about the Obamas being "tanned." Both of those were excused as instances of cultural ignorance, usually accompanied by a "hey, it was a joke you PC Americans. Lighten up!"
@lodown: I totally agree. I think it's safe to say that the problem isn't Americans being too PC (as if) but that many Europeans are quite comfortable with their racism because it's still the status quo in many parts of Europe. A head of state makes racist comments on a regular basis and there doesn't seem to be much condemnation from the European community.
@topsy: Right, because Europeans are automatically more enlightened than we prudish, Bible-thumping Americans. It's kinda like how some lefty men feel their liberal social views gives them the license to say/do the most sexist things.
I don't think it's fair to judge people when it comes to this sort of thing as racist when you don't know how certain things are or aren't perceived in another continent. I am european and I never know what might offend an american. Most things one notices when others react to them. Things that an american might find offensive aren't always offensive to other cultures. These pics to me look like what Lady Gaga did maybe a couple of months ago, when she did that photoshoot for ID magazine, sort of like a negative of a photograph. Plus, the model is completely painted in one colour, does that still qualify as black face? It doesn't look like it's done with the intention to be racist and to mock someone.
@ninles: I'm sorry, but I'm European too, and from quite a monoracial place that is fairly racist. When I first moved away I iwas incredibly ignorant and said all kinds of accidentally racist stuff. It took my friends firmly pointing out that to me to make me start educating myself. Ignorance is not an excuse, it doesn't make stuff not racist. Some French people might find racist stuff ok (like some Americans do), but that doesn't excuse them. And instead of suggesting that you 'never know what might offend an American, putting yourself in the place of the other culture.
@ninles: I'm from Europe, and I find this offensive. Just sayin'. Sure, not knowing what others find offensive is not in itself bad...but it is bad if we don't choose to educate ourselves about why they might object.
The shoot is apparently intended to be arty, to be edgy; fine. But it feels cheap and attention-seeking, and the lack of non-white models in the rest of the issue suggests that the editors are actually the opposite of edgy - they are just lazy and conservative.
This is pitiful and sad. Interestingly, Miss France 2009, Chloe Mortaud, is a biracial black woman born and raised in France. However, many of her white countrynmen felt she didn't adquately represent the country, despite the many peoples of color living there (especially those from former French colonies). She's been called Miss Obama and mongrel among other names. (sigh)
@MyEyesSee: Why am I not surprised? Europe could teach the US a lot about racism; they've been at it longer. This is the New Face of Europe folks, so get used to it. My black children will be able to claim that they are of European descent because their Mummy is European. And has the passport to prove it!
Regarding the term "blackface", I think there's a real difference between a white person putting dark makeup on, and blackface. Traditional blackface was intended to parody African Americans. I don't think that playing with identity in this way is the same thing. The same goes for men who dress up as women. When it's a parody of women I despise it, but when the intention is to parody social norms or to portray real characters I'm ok with it. Consider when Robert Downey Jr.'s character played an African American in Tropic Thunder. There the intention was to make fun of acting, and it worked even though the character was clearly racist. In the Vogue spread there are images where the model is painted black, painted white, and painted a combination of the two. For this reason, it seems that the intention was to acknowledge race in a provocative way. Whether it was effective or just offensive is another matter. What's more telling to me, is the fact that neither in this spread or anywhere else are models other than standard sized, white women featured - even though it's supposedly a tribute to models.
@topsy: Well of course if the group disagrees the comments must be wrong. Ironic that you are touting the group mentality in a story that involves the French. I believe they had an issue with mob rule a while back.
As I mentioned in the first story about this, racism does not exist on its own. It is an intent. There is no way there was intent here. Brown paint on white skin is not in and of itself a minstrel show, and it does not inherently make the pictures racist. So by the logic of the detractors on the board, no one is ever allowed to wear white robes anymore just because the Klan does? Or is it the pointy hats that make them racists? The people involved in this are not racists. So the pics cant be either.
The most disturbing thing about this is that if they had used a black model wearing white paint in the spread, this article and these discussions would not even exist. Everyone here that is offended by this would be appeased by that simple tit for tat. And for anyone to think that actual racism could be resolved so easily is dangerous. If your resolution to "racism" can be resolved that simply, then it wasn't real in the first place. And please spare me the forth coming "I didn't say that would appease me" line. Its the truth, and if you're being honest with us and yourself you know it is.
@ohayou_kun: I thought 'White Chicks' was VERY offensive. Of course, I'm going by what I saw in the trailer, since I nor any other black person I know has never seen it. Now what?
@cainemarko: I think it is spectacularly reductive to bring complex discussions of how images are embedded in a network and a history of racial stereotyping down to 'the people involved in this are not racists. So the pic can't be either'. A: how on earth would you know what their private beliefs are? B: Racism, or any other ideological position, doesn't function overtly. Most of us are unaware of our own prejudices. C: Nobody has suggested that the editors of Vogue 'are racists'. You are setting that up as a straw man. To adopt the Tom Cruise debating style you seem to favour: you can't handle the truth.
@DexterHaven: It's easier to set up a straw man when you don't have a leg to stand on. It's supposed to be a distraction but I don't think it's working.
@DexterHaven: The same can be asked of you. You are applying racial claims to these people and this incident.
A: how on earth would you know what their private beliefs are?
The same way you do apparently. Your assumption that they are racists is as valid as my assumption that they aren't.
B: Racism, or any other ideological position, doesn't function overtly. Most of us are unaware of our own prejudices.
Exactly. Real racists don't go around promoting it. Much less produce multipage photo shoots in international magazines touting that racism.
C: Nobody has suggested that the editors of Vogue 'are racists'.
Ok, lets say hypothetically that's true. So then what you are saying is that the the images are racist instead. No actual person is, just the pictures. Talk about a strawman argument.
You and others on this board will never concede any of my points as it gets in the way of you politically correct agenda. No one ever actually wants to discuss race. You just want to bludgeon the other side into submission in hopes of them just going away. That does nothing to actually help resolve the race issues in the world.
I can only assume you would have made equally as forceful an arguement for Tawana Brawley, or the Duke Lacrosse "victim", up to the point where they were both proven to be liars. You much like the professors at Duke who condemned the entire team immediately, see race first and no further discussion is warranted. And god help the person that does. They are obviously (moronic, deficient, dense, witless, dim, foolish, brainless, half-witted, idiotic, shortsighted, simple, slow, sluggish, thick, imbecilic, unintelligent, insert your own...) Although I have to admit being called Tom Cruise is a new one. Kudos for that. #vogueblackface
I'm black, and I don't find this very offensive. What I am offended by is the fact that they could've hired at least ONE black model for the magazine.
I don't think there's anything wrong with this because really, she's just painted brown. They didn't enhance her lips or give her an out of control afro wig, or any of the stuff that really makes me think "blackface". She's just darker.
@unalteredone: So you're not offended? Lucky for you. What about those of us who are? I have white folks asking me if I'm offended by this or that and I always respond that just because ONE of us thinks something's okay isn't a general 'get out of jail free' card. There's no King/Queen of the Negroes.
@topsy: I don't believe that I've attacked, degraded, or made less important the opinions of anybody else who has commented here and stated that they were offended. You're right, it is lucky for me that I'm not offended, because now I can carry on being offended by the millions of other offensive things about the world.
I added in my race because, like it or not, it does kind of matter who the "I'm NOT offended" comment comes from. I in no way meant it as a green light for white folks to start jumping in brown paint and walking around all day talking about massa' and what not. I'm just saying, I'm more offended by "mammy" type of images, like Aunt Jemima, than I am by some white girl covered in brown concealer.
I understand wanting to caution people against the "well my one black friend says...." effect, but don't put that shit on me, because I never said, "hey chill out everybody, I've just made it OK to love blackface!" #vogueblackface
knowing a little bit about race relations/(im)migration in france, i am not at all surprised. french cultural elites and the middle-class are very reluctant to reconceive of french identity as anything besides white european and are very resentful of migration to the country by afro-carribean persons living in french territories and departments and immigration by north africans/arabs. france was a colonial power and now they're upset that in the post-colonial world have to live alongside those they used to rule.
@KATE!: Yes, I've heard this too. It's kind of amazing that in 2009, when non-white immigrants have been coming to France for decades, they still refuse to acknowledge larger racial issues or to see themselves as anything other than the superior white colonizers (I can't think of another good explanation for this spread)
@Highsmith: Yeah, though I don't think one could argue that Baker's reception in France was particularly progressive, what with the banana skirt and the cheetah..
@Highsmith: enjoying the artistic output of two black entertainers does not trump, erase, or undue historical and cultural racism/xenophobia that affects the lives of hundreds of thousands of french citizens and residents. they are exceptions that don't change the rule.
you can even make the argument that one of the reasons josephine baker was so welcomed by french people was BECAUSE she was a highly eroticized other that played into colonial myths about the hypersexuality of native peoples. I mean, come on, her most famous dance performance was called the "danse sauvage" and she wore a skirt made of bananas. she became a citizens through marriage, but she was first and foremost a PERFORMER. that being said, baker was still a badass who fought for civil and human rights but i doubt that her acceptance into the french mainstream is a whole-hearted/wholesome as you make it to sound.
Indeed. As an African America woman who has traveled extensively throughout France while reading for my PhD in French History I can honestly say that this perceived prejudice seems to stem more from class and economics than it does to your actual skin tone. As in England.
I don't think you can say that by and large French society as a whole is more or less racist than any other place. Their problems with immigration are also something that should be viewed in a wider spectrum, such as the lack of desire on the part of many of these North Africa/Arab/Afro-Carribean minority communities to integrate.
Let's try to refrain from broad and sweeping generalizations. This editorial is outrageous, but it simply cannot be attributable to the whole of the French peoples perceived prejudice.
@KaneBaker: that would be dumb considering that the french are not a minority racial or cultural group living within a dominant racial or cultural community that is disinclined to recognize them as equal.
@AtelierCeleste: class is completely tied into race though, especially when economic opportunities are denied to you because of your skin color/ethnic background.
as far as assimilation and integration go: why should these groups be forced to forget their cultural heritage and adopt the cultural markers of a society that doesn't really want them AS THEY ARE but would only accept them if they were more like them? and how do you integrate into a culture when you go into a job interview are immediately taken out of consideration when you open your mouth and the interviewer hears your accent?
the riots in 2005 happened because immigrant youth couldn't find jobs BECAUSE they were immigrants. they wanted to work and many of them did conceive of themselves as french but weren't treated as such.
im not saying france is any more or any less racist than anywhere else. im just saying that it IS and it is something that they cultural minister is going to have to address at some point. either french culture needs to reimagine itself as more inclusive or these sorts of problems are going to continue indefinitely.
@DexterHaven: I don't think Baker was FORCED by the French to put on the banana skirt & play up the whole "exotic animal" thing. She was a very liberated women & owning her own sexuality (as is Grace Jones). Beyond the obvious racial implications the artistic output of these two extraordinary women has, there clearly was & is an artistic appreciation (by the French & internationally) of Baker & Jones. I don't want to ignore the racial issues but I don't think it's fair to discuss these two groundbreaking & talented performers in terms of their race foremost & all.
@Highsmith: Absolutely, and as stated above Baker was a total badass. But the history of her popularity in France is inextricably tied to the idea of blackness as primitive exoticism.
@KATE!:
You basically just said that French people are racist. I am hugely offended by this unqualified, unequivocal statement which is in itself racist.
@Highsmith: I think you're being rather blind to the specificity of racial stereotyping and how it is often gendered. Ideas of primitivism, animality or savagery, even when couched in admiring terms, are othering, a way of considering these women as less than human, even while admiring their glamour.
@Highsmith: They have embraced non-French black entertainers. As long as a black person has a return ticket to where-ever they come from, things are cool. Most of the French people I encountered LOVED me, especially once I opened my mouth and mangled their language. The same friendly faces turned really ugly real quick when a actual French born black person or Francophone African joined in.
@chinaplate: i never said that french people are racist. pointing out that french culture sets up a hierarchical relationship in opposition to the minority and immigrant cultures that exist within the larger civil society does not mean that every individual person in france is a racist. america society is structured the exact same way and i wouldnt say that everyone in the united states is a racist. there is a difference between a culture of racism and a nation-state being made up solely of individual racists.
also, both france and the us have large communities of poc. if i were to say that ALL french or ALL americans are racist i would be making the assumption that ALL people in those countries are members of the culturally dominant group and be ignoring the existence of the communities of poc.
Somewhere in New York, Anna Wintour is breathing a sigh of relief. Unsubtle racism is an American Vogue no-no (now subtle? that's another whole shebang). Carine was supposedly in the running if Wintour's contract wasn't renewed.
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/07/09
It is a little embarrassing. One of my friends peeked in my makeup bag and was like "I didn't know you were a Mary Kate and Ashley fan" #zoekravitz
11/06/09
Fisher's ads feature a pretty wide range of women (ages, races and yes, sizes). She doesn't need to target the plus-size market because they already flock to her.
Also, Rosie bugs me. Does Donna Karan go for a plus size image? No. #ragtrade
11/06/09
If I go to a higher end department store and look at plus sizes, the style is very dowdy and matronly. There are young, plus size women who have the money to buy nice things.
11/06/09
However, it is true the company is consciously chasing a younger "hipper" customer -- they certainly collaborated with a Times article stating same -- and that strikes me as foolish.
And if Fisher herself said what O'Donnell reports, to her very face, that is just downright mean.
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
Famous person talking about and wearing your clothes = great advertising. Famous person telling fans how rude and ungrateful clothing designer is = bad advertising. That's how social media works, lady. #zoekravitz
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
I didn't know the President was able to do this. Are we in England? #ragtrade
11/06/09
11/06/09
10/14/09
And I don't think the "But we're French!" excuse flies anymore. It's not like France is hermetically sealed off from the rest of the world or doesn't have its own racial problems. I'm sorry to say that from my perspective, Europeans seem to be behind Americans in terms of racial sensitivity. I still clearly remember the slanty eyes pictures of the Spanish Olympic basketball team and the repeated, lame Berlusconi jokes about the Obamas being "tanned." Both of those were excused as instances of cultural ignorance, usually accompanied by a "hey, it was a joke you PC Americans. Lighten up!"
Ugh.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
The shoot is apparently intended to be arty, to be edgy; fine. But it feels cheap and attention-seeking, and the lack of non-white models in the rest of the issue suggests that the editors are actually the opposite of edgy - they are just lazy and conservative.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
As I mentioned in the first story about this, racism does not exist on its own. It is an intent. There is no way there was intent here. Brown paint on white skin is not in and of itself a minstrel show, and it does not inherently make the pictures racist. So by the logic of the detractors on the board, no one is ever allowed to wear white robes anymore just because the Klan does? Or is it the pointy hats that make them racists? The people involved in this are not racists. So the pics cant be either.
The most disturbing thing about this is that if they had used a black model wearing white paint in the spread, this article and these discussions would not even exist. Everyone here that is offended by this would be appeased by that simple tit for tat. And for anyone to think that actual racism could be resolved so easily is dangerous. If your resolution to "racism" can be resolved that simply, then it wasn't real in the first place. And please spare me the forth coming "I didn't say that would appease me" line. Its the truth, and if you're being honest with us and yourself you know it is.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/15/09
A: how on earth would you know what their private beliefs are?
The same way you do apparently. Your assumption that they are racists is as valid as my assumption that they aren't.
B: Racism, or any other ideological position, doesn't function overtly. Most of us are unaware of our own prejudices.
Exactly. Real racists don't go around promoting it. Much less produce multipage photo shoots in international magazines touting that racism.
C: Nobody has suggested that the editors of Vogue 'are racists'.
Ok, lets say hypothetically that's true. So then what you are saying is that the the images are racist instead. No actual person is, just the pictures. Talk about a strawman argument.
You and others on this board will never concede any of my points as it gets in the way of you politically correct agenda. No one ever actually wants to discuss race. You just want to bludgeon the other side into submission in hopes of them just going away. That does nothing to actually help resolve the race issues in the world.
I can only assume you would have made equally as forceful an arguement for Tawana Brawley, or the Duke Lacrosse "victim", up to the point where they were both proven to be liars. You much like the professors at Duke who condemned the entire team immediately, see race first and no further discussion is warranted. And god help the person that does. They are obviously (moronic, deficient, dense, witless, dim, foolish, brainless, half-witted, idiotic, shortsighted, simple, slow, sluggish, thick, imbecilic, unintelligent, insert your own...) Although I have to admit being called Tom Cruise is a new one. Kudos for that. #vogueblackface
10/14/09
I don't think there's anything wrong with this because really, she's just painted brown. They didn't enhance her lips or give her an out of control afro wig, or any of the stuff that really makes me think "blackface". She's just darker.
10/14/09
10/16/09
I added in my race because, like it or not, it does kind of matter who the "I'm NOT offended" comment comes from. I in no way meant it as a green light for white folks to start jumping in brown paint and walking around all day talking about massa' and what not. I'm just saying, I'm more offended by "mammy" type of images, like Aunt Jemima, than I am by some white girl covered in brown concealer.
I understand wanting to caution people against the "well my one black friend says...." effect, but don't put that shit on me, because I never said, "hey chill out everybody, I've just made it OK to love blackface!" #vogueblackface
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
you can even make the argument that one of the reasons josephine baker was so welcomed by french people was BECAUSE she was a highly eroticized other that played into colonial myths about the hypersexuality of native peoples. I mean, come on, her most famous dance performance was called the "danse sauvage" and she wore a skirt made of bananas. she became a citizens through marriage, but she was first and foremost a PERFORMER. that being said, baker was still a badass who fought for civil and human rights but i doubt that her acceptance into the french mainstream is a whole-hearted/wholesome as you make it to sound.
10/14/09
10/14/09
Indeed. As an African America woman who has traveled extensively throughout France while reading for my PhD in French History I can honestly say that this perceived prejudice seems to stem more from class and economics than it does to your actual skin tone. As in England.
I don't think you can say that by and large French society as a whole is more or less racist than any other place. Their problems with immigration are also something that should be viewed in a wider spectrum, such as the lack of desire on the part of many of these North Africa/Arab/Afro-Carribean minority communities to integrate.
Let's try to refrain from broad and sweeping generalizations. This editorial is outrageous, but it simply cannot be attributable to the whole of the French peoples perceived prejudice.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
as far as assimilation and integration go: why should these groups be forced to forget their cultural heritage and adopt the cultural markers of a society that doesn't really want them AS THEY ARE but would only accept them if they were more like them? and how do you integrate into a culture when you go into a job interview are immediately taken out of consideration when you open your mouth and the interviewer hears your accent?
the riots in 2005 happened because immigrant youth couldn't find jobs BECAUSE they were immigrants. they wanted to work and many of them did conceive of themselves as french but weren't treated as such.
im not saying france is any more or any less racist than anywhere else. im just saying that it IS and it is something that they cultural minister is going to have to address at some point. either french culture needs to reimagine itself as more inclusive or these sorts of problems are going to continue indefinitely.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
You basically just said that French people are racist. I am hugely offended by this unqualified, unequivocal statement which is in itself racist.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
also, both france and the us have large communities of poc. if i were to say that ALL french or ALL americans are racist i would be making the assumption that ALL people in those countries are members of the culturally dominant group and be ignoring the existence of the communities of poc.
10/14/09
In fact, this is a sad face. A SAD FUCKING FACE.
10/14/09