Jezebel

  • Jezebel
  • celebrity
  • sex
  • fashion
Profile logout login
Writer Pins Concern For Fashion Models On Female Jealousy

Writer Pins Concern For Fashion Models On Female Jealousy #weightymatters #lisahilton

J. Crew: Socks & Sensibilities

J. Crew: Socks & Sensibilities #todayincatalogs #jcrewcatalog

Fat Like Him: Self-Help Writer's Ex Speaks Out

Fat Like Him: Self-Help Writer's Ex Speaks Out #backtalk #marryhim

Does Sexism Sell? With Super Bowl Commercials, Not Really

Does Sexism Sell? With Super Bowl Commercials, Not Really #badvertising #superbowladssexist

<i>Kell On Earth</i>: Idiot Interns, Idiot Journalists

Kell On Earth: Idiot Interns, Idiot Journalists #realitybites #kellonearthgeorgew

Dita Von Teese Gets &quot;Scared&quot; On <em>RuPaul's Drag Race</em>

Dita Von Teese Gets "Scared" On RuPaul's Drag Race #youbetterwork #rupaulsdragrace

<i>Weekly Standard</i> Writer: The Real Victims Of &quot;Hookup Culture&quot; Are Guys

Weekly Standard Writer: The Real Victims Of "Hookup Culture" Are Guys #betablues #hookupculture

Jezebel

FAQ. Include # before tag:
#tips, #snapjudgment, #groupthink, etc.

New York, 6:39 AM
Wed Feb 10
67 posts in the last 24 hours

JEZEBEL TEAM

Tip your editors:


Editor-in-Chief:
Anna Holmes
| Twitter

Deputy Editor:
Dodai Stewart
| Twitter

Senior Contributing Editor:
Tracie Egan Morrissey
| Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Anna North
| Twitter
Sadie Stein
| Twitter

Reporter:
Irin Carmon


Editorial Assistant:
Margaret Hartmann
| Twitter

Contributors:
Rich Juzwiak
| Twitter
Latoya Peterson

Jenna Sauers


Contributor/Intern Coordinator:
Katy Kelleher
Twitter

Interns:
Maura Canavan
Madeleine Desmond
Noorain Khan
Lucy Zhihui Zhu

Weekends/Commenter Moderator:
Hortense
| Twitter

SUBSCRIBE TO JEZEBEL RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
1770 Subscribers


Please confirm your birth date:

Please enter a valid date
Please enter your full birth year
This content is restricted.

Embrace Of Embryonic Testing During IVF Doing More Harm Than Good?

Older women who undergo in vitro fertilization are often encouraged to shell out for pre-implantation genetic screening in an effort to determine the best embryos to implant. But there's increasing evidence that the screening does more harm than good.

Gautam Naik writes in the Wall Street Journal that, despite a 2007 guidance from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, there is zero evidence that PGS increases the rate of live births among older women undergoing IVF procedures, and doctors have continued to perform (and encourage women to have) it. Why? Naik has a potential answer.

Backed by limited positive data from a decade ago, some U.S. fertility clinics have aggressively marketed the PGS technique to older women. It isn't cheap. Embryo screening can add $2,000 or more to the typical cost of roughly $10,000 per treatment cycle of in-vitro fertilization. While some insurance companies cover IVF treatment, very few pay for PGS, which insurers consider experimental.

In other words, PGS is the new undercoating.

While doctors who use and market PGS in their practices despite the ASRM's guidance defend its use and effectiveness, rigorous studies showing otherwise have been available since 2004.

A randomized trial in 2004, in which a Belgian research team studied nearly 300 fertilization procedures, was among the first to indicate that embryo screening may not improve the live birth rate.

A recent Swedish trial, which included more than 100 women over the age of 38, suggests that embryo screening may actually hurt a woman's chances of having a baby. The study found that the pregnancy rate in a PGS group was 8.9% compared with 24.5% in a control group that didn't use PGS. The study, published in the journal Human Reproduction in December, was stopped midway after the data showed the sharply lower pregnancy rate.

Most randomized studies (and sometimes even the doctors don't know which is the control and which is the experimental group) are only stopped if the evidence shows convincingly that they are doing more harm than good.

Scientists have a potential hypothesis for why the post-PGS pregnancy rate was nearly 3 times lower than the non-PGS rate: PGS is often performed on a 6-cell embryo, likely to mitigate the political hot potato of destroying the embryos that are found to be malformed. This, however, might represent a bigger problem than doctors initially envisaged.

Doctors postulated that in performing PGS, the process of removing a single cell could damage other cells in the embryo. "The probability of doing harm with PGS turned out to be higher," says Thorir Hardarson, biologist at Carlanderska Hospital Fertility Center in Gothenberg, Sweden, who led the trial.

Doctors looking at embryos from otherwise healthy fertile couples have a further explanation, after discovering that the rate of abnormality in their PGS screenings was very despite the theoretical probability being very low.

The answer appears to be that the single cell extracted from each embryo could be genetically slightly different from the others, and therefore not representative of the overall embryo, a condition known as mosaicism. In fact, removing an error-free cell from an embryo might lower the chances that that embryo will grow into a healthy baby, because the remaining cells might not be as viable, Dr. Vermeesch says

Either way, women being pressured into or sold on PGS as a way to improve their chances at conceiving through IVF are paying money for something that, at best, has little effect on their chances of conception and, at worse, might actually be harming it.

Fertility Method For Older Women Spawns Doubts [Wall Street Journal]


Send an email to Megan Carpentier, the author of this post, at askalobbyist@gmail.com.


Upload an image | Add an image URL ×
×
×
Choose a file to upload:
×
Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
Loading comments ... -/|\
Earlier discussions Paging in progress... | Other discussions | Show all discussions | Show featured discussions only | Expand all replies Hide all replies
Start a new discussion
By Megan
Jul 1, 2009 04:00 PM 0 14
Edit » Set to Draft » Invite » Syndicate »

Syndicate this post


Site:
Mode:

sending request
cancel
more about #pgstestingivf
read more: #testingwoes, #pgstestingivf, #invitrofertilization, #pregeneticscreening, #infertility, #medicalindustrialcomplex, #gettypic
 
  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Jezebel account.

Sign up here.



Send An Invitation

To invite commenters to this page, paste in a list of comma-separated email addresses, and then select send invites.

Please enter at least one email address.
Please use valid email addresses.
Please use unique email addresses.
Please enter fewer addresses.
requesting invites

Send a link

Send a link to this post 'Embrace Of Embryonic Testing During IVF Doing More Harm Than Good?' via email:

Please enter your name.
Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter your recipient's email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter your message.
Sending message