The Socialites At The New Yorkers For Children Soiree Looked Kinda Silly

Illustration for article titled The Socialites At The New Yorkers For Children Soiree Looked Kinda Silly

High-society events, like last night's New Yorkers for Children's Ninth Annual Fall Gala, are a nice change from celeb ones. On the one hand, you're less likely to see flat-out Uglies. But there's always a lot of subtle "bad" that's technically tasteful but really weird. Not that there weren't celebs there - think Blake Lively, Julianne Moore, Joy Bryant - but the evening belonged to Tory Burch, Celerie Kemble and their similarly-named cronies. And as a New Yorker who's, you know, for children, I feel unusually qualified to judge them. After the jump!



The Good:

Advertisement
Illustration for article titled The Socialites At The New Yorkers For Children Soiree Looked Kinda Silly

Do I even need to say it? Joy shut. It. Down.

Illustration for article titled The Socialites At The New Yorkers For Children Soiree Looked Kinda Silly

Am I slightly obsessed with Celerie Kemble's name to the point of seriously considering naming a doll after her?? Maybe. But my admiration for her diaphanous gown is sincere.

Illustration for article titled The Socialites At The New Yorkers For Children Soiree Looked Kinda Silly

I mean, if you're gonna do a red benefit gown, do a red benefit gown. Dayssi Olarte de Kanavos.

Illustration for article titled The Socialites At The New Yorkers For Children Soiree Looked Kinda Silly
Advertisement

Kind of digging how, from the neck up, Nanette Lepore just rolled out of bed, yet is wearing this rad boho frock. It's stupidly rebellious in a way my inner 14-year-old appreciates.
The Bad:

Illustration for article titled The Socialites At The New Yorkers For Children Soiree Looked Kinda Silly
Advertisement

There's a lot to be said for the "Go Big Or Go Home" school of "Bad." Deborah Bancroft showcases this spirit with what may or may not be a satin shower curtain.

Illustration for article titled The Socialites At The New Yorkers For Children Soiree Looked Kinda Silly
Advertisement

This, ladies and germs, is what we like to call a "scroll-down fug." Julianne Moore's shoes are covered in moss.

Illustration for article titled The Socialites At The New Yorkers For Children Soiree Looked Kinda Silly
Advertisement

I can see how in theory - like, lying on the bed - this is pretty. Guess Tory Burch thought so too.

Illustration for article titled The Socialites At The New Yorkers For Children Soiree Looked Kinda Silly
Advertisement

Normally Blake Lively's pretty infallible because she does fresh and young so well. But this Buckingham-Nicks look is not only neither, it's kinda benefit-inappropriate, no? You'd think Serena would know that!

Illustration for article titled The Socialites At The New Yorkers For Children Soiree Looked Kinda Silly
Advertisement

I get how a little peep of skin is supposed to be sexier than revealing too much, but it can't just be a random patch, like on Stephanie LaCava 's.

Illustration for article titled The Socialites At The New Yorkers For Children Soiree Looked Kinda Silly
Advertisement

I'm aware I've brought up the My Fair Lady "Ascot" scene like three times this week and it's Wednesday, but if the shoe fits...or, in the case of Jamee Gregory, the double bow tie...

Images via Getty

DISCUSSION

jennyoh
Stranger Bird

I love the color of Blake Lively's dress, but it looks as if it's seamed specifically for a pregnant belly, which, if one is not pregnant, is a little unfortunate.

(She isn't pregnant, is she? My only impression of her is "Plays teenager on tv" so I immediately assumed not)

And yeah, I can't help fearing that the moss on Julianne Moore's shoes is about to start crawling up her legs, but hurray for being proud of your freckles!