Some Men's Sports Are Losing Funding Because Of Title IX Interpretation

Illustration for article titled Some Men's Sports Are Losing Funding Because Of Title IX Interpretation

Billie Jean King was on NPR's Morning Edition today talking about the impending 35th anniversary of the "Battle of the Sexes" she fought with professional jerkface Bobby Riggs. For those too young to remember, Riggs, an aging tennis star, challenged King to a tennis match, saying he would beat her because women are too weak to compete against men. Well, Billie Jean handed Riggs his ass in three straight sets, and it was a very public victory for all women in sports. Flash forward to now, and the battle of the sexes is no longer about athletic prowess: on the college level at least, it's about athletic funding. According to the Wall Street Journal, some think that money going to female athletes is making it hard for college athletic programs to provide for less popular men's sports, like gymnastics.China beat the U.S. in the medal count this year, and according to the Journal, " while Chinese athletes rely on state sports schools," the men's gymnastic team at Arizona State, which has lost school funding, depend on their own fund raising to continue training. Some schools are choosing to implement Title IX, which forces colleges to spend the same amount of money as men's and women's sports, by the gender breakdown of their entire student body. In other words, if a school is 54% female, then 54% of their athletic budget goes to women's sports. It seems to me that more of the blame should be placed on the football teams that eat the bulk of the men's sports budgets at many large universities. But, as the Journal points out, the Arizona State athletic department chose to cut gymnastics and two other sports that were Olympic feeders "because, unlike the football program, they don't generate much revenue. The department's $41 million budget depends on ticket sales, team souvenirs, event parking and other game-related revenue, about half of which comes from football." And ultimately, shouldn't we be more concerned with the cut backs on the academic side of the fence when there is a finite amount of university money to be shared? When it comes to choosing between a men's gymnastic team or paying a few more writing teachers, it doesn't seem like a tough decision to make. Cutbacks In College Sports Risk U.S. Olympic Future [WSJ] Billie Jean King Remembers 'Battle Of The Sexes' [NPR]



Suck it whiners, from a gal who wanted to play sports in the 70s but had precious few choices. I ended up playing softball in the 4th grade. Our fields were the old baseball fields, in the back of the park. This was in Texas, so the grass sucked and was full of sticker burrs. Our dads had to maintain the fields. We barely had bleachers and usually someone's parent had to be the umpire. The baseball boys? You can imagine. We didn't even have lights on our fields. Hmph.

Title IX didn't solve everything. There are still ways to keep girls' athletics on a sub-par level. It's better, though.

I agree: the real culprit is football. But oh, how I love thee, Texas Longhorns! Hook 'em!