Sex, Meth, and Elmo: Kevin Clash's Accusers Tell All

Image for article titled Sex, Meth, and Elmo: Kevin Clash's Accusers Tell All

The three men who came forward in the past month alleging that former Elmo puppeteer Kevin Clash had sex with them when they were minors have since been on the receiving end of a lot of negative attention. With lawsuits being filed and settlement money on the table, they've been called liars, gold-diggers, and much worse. But now they're finally speaking out, giving lurid, detailed accounts of their alleged relationships with Clash and what they say are the predatory grooming methods of the man who created one of the most beloved children's characters of all time.


For the first time since the scandal emerged in the press, the three men are speaking in-depth about what they claim happened between them and Clash, recounting their version of events to The Daily Beast. Some of what they say is disturbing, and while the allegations of people who claim to be victims of sexual abuse should certainly (and always) be taken seriously, the three men have pointed out that they didn't consider themselves to be victims. Furthermore, they aren't pressing charges against Clash. So have they made their claims out of a courageous response to the "adverse psychological and emotional effects" their interactions with Clash imposed on them? Or are they playing this out in the public sphere for what their individual cases all have in common: Money?

The news started with the first accuser, a 24-year-old college student from Harrisburg, PA, Sheldon Stephens, who says he met Clash when he was 16 at a charity event, and began a sexual relationship with him sometime after that, which he says lasted, on-and-off, for about seven years.

In his interview with The Daily Beast, Stephens says that the first time he visited Clash in Manhattan, he, Clash, and Clash's driver all did crystal meth together, engaged in some foreplay, and then he had intercourse with Clash (but not the driver):

"I knew it was wrong, but I also felt like I was growing up and they were very smart about it. I can't even really explain it. I always felt it was creepy. I always felt it was wrong. But I stayed. I wasn't raped. I just told myself it was OK so I would not be constantly depressed or confused."

Prior to Stephens' allegations, Clash was not publicly out of the closet. A divorced father of a 20-year-old daughter, he made no mention of his homosexuality in his 2006 memoir My Life as a Red Furry Monster or in the 2011 critically acclaimed documentary about his life Being Elmo.

Stephens was aware of Clash's orientation, though. He admits that the two bonded emotionally, and that Clash told him he loved him. "He was mentally confused about his sexuality," Stephens says of Clash.


When Clash ended their relationship and said they could no longer speak, Stephens' first action was to write an angry letter: "I wrote him that instead of helping me out [with a modeling career], he focused on stealing my manhood. He never replied."

His next step was to contact Clash's employer, Sesame Street, instead of the police. (He says that his grandmother, a Jehovah's Witness, convinced him not to go to the police, because her religion doesn't believe in involving the authorities.)


A source close to Sesame Street says that the company responded "seriously and without delay" to Stephens' accusations. They did an internal investigation and also hired a third party to look into the claims, but couldn't find anything to prove that a sexual relationship took place when Stephens was underage. They met with Stephens twice over the summer, and he could not provide the documentation that he promised would prove he had sex with Clash when he was a minor.

In his interview with The Daily Beast, Stephens repeatedly insisted that he didn't want Clash fired from Sesame Street, nor did he want any money. If he didn't want Clash to lose his job, then why involve his employer? If he didn't want money, why go to a wealthy non-profit that relies solely upon its good reputation to sell the merchandise that keeps it afloat?


"I just wanted them to know because he works with children," said Stephens.

Representatives met with Stephens twice over the summer and a source there said that Stephens suggested, "as a resolution 'substantial monetary payment.'" After the meetings, he hired Ben Andreozzi, an attorney who specializes in sexual-abuse cases, and represented one of the victims in the Jerry Sandusky case, to handle a settlement deal.


But then the news was leaked to TMZ.

Stephens said Andreozzi told him that if there hadn't been a leak, he probably would have been able to get close to $1 million. But because of the press reports, the lawyer told him, negotiations began at $250,000 and went down from there, Stephens said.


Stephens, who had insisted that this wasn't about money (although he did have a representative ask for monetary compensation for his interview with The Daily Beast) said that he would take what was offered. "I'm going to finish school, my mom needs help paying bills, my niece is about to go into pre-school. I'm taking the money to better other people's lives and my own."

Even though he agreed to recant his allegations about having sex with Clash while he was underage, Stephens then reportedly recanted that recantation. Yet, he still thinks he's getting the settlement money that was contingent upon his denial that he was underage when he had sex with Clash. His lawyer, Andreozzi, is no longer speaking to him.


And then The Smoking Gun revealed Stephens' criminal record, which consisted of a few smaller crimes (writing bad checks, reckless driving), and one big one: In 2009, Stephens was arrested for two felony counts of receiving stolen property after a man named Darian Pollard called the Beverly Hills Police Department to report that Stephens, whom he said was an intern he had just fired, held him up at knifepoint and stole $250,000 worth of diamond jewelry. Stephens insisted they were gifts and that it was all a "misunderstanding." The charges were eventually dropped. For some reason, when his connection to Stephens was revealed, Pollard denied ever knowing him and hired Gloria Allred as an attorney. Stephens says he and Pollard are still friends.


Now that he has breached his settlement terms, the only course of action Stephens has left is to report the alleged sexual abuse to the police, since the statute of limitations has not run out. But he says he has no intention of doing so.

The second man to come out with allegations against Clash is Cecil Singleton, a 24-year-old college student from Harlem, who says he began a relationship with Clash when he was just 15. He came forward with his claims after he saw a news report about Stephens' allegations. Singleton, another aspiring model, hired a lawyer and filed a $5 million lawsuit.


Singleton came from a troubled background, having spent two years in foster care before meeting Clash on a gay chat phone line. Although he was only 15, he told Clash he was 18. The two met up for a date, where he says he came clean with Clash about his age, adding that Clash was undeterred. Singleton admits it wasn't unusual for him to date older men. He'd had sex with adult men before meeting Clash. While he says the two "engaged in sexual behavior," they didn't have intercourse.

"I allowed him to pursue me to see what would develop. The one thing I can say that was consistent the entire time that I've known him is that he was a gentleman. He was never disrespectful or aggressive verbally with me. If there's anything I was seduced by, it was that fact. That distinguished him. He was very nice."


Singleton says he and Clash saw each other casually, off and on, for about four or five years. Clash would give Singleton "small amounts of cash" to help him get by. He says they didn't have sex until he was 19 or 20. They stopped seeing each other shortly after that.

The way Singleton puts it, he wasn't upset about his relationship with Clash until he learned of Stephens' allegations.

"It's like if you date a teacher you have a crush on and you believe it's something special. You know you shouldn't do it but you can't help it. I thought it was all about me. But I realize that whether it's a man or woman, gay or straight, it's inappropriate, illegal, and immoral. I'm not saying I'm not responsible. I did play a part. But I feel strongly now that he's a predator."


Singleton says that he will drop his $5 million lawsuit if Clash acknowledges "what happened."

Jeff Herman, the attorney handling Singleton's case, is also representing a third accuser, a 28-year-old anonymous man known only as "D.O.," who is also suing Clash. Like Singleton and Stephens, D.O. was an aspiring model when he met Clash on a gay chat phone line in 2000. He was 16 at the time. D.O. says they engaged in sexual activity but didn't have intercourse. They remained in touch and eventually had sex for the first time when he was 18. Like Singleton, D.O. had not "realized he had been victimized until he learned about [Stephens]."


In 2009, D.O. began writing a memoir, which included a chapter about his relationship with Clash that his lawyer has since leaked to the media. It reads like erotica, referring to Clash as "The Tickler" and their sexual relationship as a "father and son" game.

Of course, the motives of the men speaking out don't negate any of their allegations. But the money they're seeking casts a shadow on an already dark situation. As for Clash, although he's technically innocent until proven guilty, the allegations have already had severe and lasting damage on his career, which is all but destroyed. He resigned from Sesame Street — where he'd worked for 28 years — two weeks ago. And just this week, a lucrative deal he'd signed with Warner Bros. Pictures — he was working on a new character for a live action/puppet feature film — fell through after the studio cut all ties with him.


Elmo's Lovers Open Up [Daily Beast]
Exclusive: Warner Bros. Cuts Ties With Secret Kevin Clash Puppet Movie [Vulture]



Why is no one discussing the fact that he basically was single-handedly responsible for taking the intelligence of the show (I know its a kids show) downhill since the introduction of Elmo. Sesame street was a show for ages 2 to 12 when I grew up, but if you ask a 9 year old what he thinks of Sesame Street now, he will undoubtedly say that they think now the show is for kids (younger than them). Elmo did more to dumb down the learning process of what Jim Henson was trying to bring to life. Learning that can be fun and fast-paced. Have a joke that goes over your head at 4 but that you get at 8. That magic has since dwindled by the introduction to the brand that is Elmo, but after the Tickle Me dolls came out and the subsequent corporate tie-ins that came along, I've never believed that he was out there for anyone other than his own advancement.