Scientists Predict That Babies Of The Future Will Be Born To Centarians With Artificial Wombs

Illustration for article titled Scientists Predict That Babies Of The Future Will Be Born To Centarians With Artificial Wombs

2007 marked a baby boomlet, with the most babies born in the United States since 1957. One of the factors behind the baby landslide is the fact that more "professional women who delayed childbearing until their 40s" are having kids, says USA Today, and at least some of those women probably had some help in the fertility department with in vitro fertilization. To mark the 30th birth of Louise Brown, the first baby who was born using IVF, Nature magazine surveyed several fertility experts for an article called Making Babies: The Next 30 Years. And what scientific advancements are these experts predicting in the baby making arena? They're forecasting that women of any age (as old as 100!) will be able to conceive, that artificial wombs will be created, that infertility will be a thing of the past, and that the price of IVF will plummet to less than $100.


Of all those advancements, I was most interested in the comments by Alan Trounson, an IVF pioneer and director of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine in San Francisco. Trounson said, "I think there will be a further expansion of low-cost IVF, especially for women in developing countries who experience social discrimination with infertility. If you remove all the expensive stuff and use low-cost drugs (such as clomiphene) and remove just one or two eggs, and only transfer one embryo, it can be done for less than $100." While I'm glad that these women in developing countries will no longer face the stigma of being infertile, it was upsetting that rather than help fight that stigma, doctors just want to pump them full of fetuses instead.

Creepiest sci-fi prediction? That we won't need real people at all to make babies! Scientists are talking artificial sperm, artificial eggs AND artificial wombs. I can't wait for the army of evil artificially spawned babies to take over the nation.

Is This The Next Baby Boom [USA Today]

The Future Of Fertility [Independent]

Making Babies: The Next 30 Years [Nature]



@limoniastrum: I don't think it's a question of hating one's body so much as... ya know... not being able to actually have kids in the body given.

"Also, there are studies that show that when children are not born naturally, then the "love cocktail" of hormones does not get released, and mother-child bonding is compromised. (ie. chimps that deliver via c-section abandon their babies)."

okay, TOTALLY calling bullshit on this one— not to you, to the theory. Chimps who delivered by c-section had OTHER abnormal SOCIAL factors (like, you know, being raised in captivity and therefore away from normal chimp social interaction that, among other things, helps prepare them for motherhood) that obviously something to do with that.

Also, how does all that figure into adoption?