One student featured in the video, Sophia Yapalater, told us in an email that she had been subjected to "an unusual amount of personal, social, and sexual harassment on the site — constant posting of my name, evaluation of my weight/attractiveness, attacks on my sexuality, slut-shaming, talking about my sex life (both in truth and falsified), evaluating every single one of my facebook pictures, claims that they would save a suggestive photo of me from a campus publication and send it to my employers" over the past three and a half years.

Advertisement

The administration told Yapalater exactly what they told Minall: that their hands were tied. But official complaints from students and parents continued to pour in and they finally proposed a self-monitoring community monitoring system near the end of April. "I don't think the administration should be monitoring Obietalk," Dean of Students Eric Estes told The Oberlin Review in the article announcing the proposal. "I think the key is empowering students to help shape acceptable discourse for themselves."

Some students disagreed. "Does [Vice President of Communications Ben Jones] have any understanding of what it's like for someone to read that they should be 'put in the fields to pick some cotton to get your lard-ass into shape', as a recent post told a certain individual to do?" sophomore Ruby Turok-Squire, a contributor to Oberlin's official Student Life blog, wrote last April, pointing out that most of the posts on Obietalk targeted women, minorities, and freshman. "Does he understand that as soon as hate speech has been published online, the damage is done? Moderation comes after the fact. All it really takes is one comment to deeply hurt someone and ruin their lives at Oberlin." She wondered why Oberlin didn't do more to combat the hate.

Advertisement

"[President Marvin] Krislov also told me that he's never been on Obie Talk," she wrote. "He doesn't want to know what's going on. The administration turn a blind eye and pretend that the problem has gone away."

Advertisement

Obietalk mysteriously disappeared soon after the administration's moderation proposal, but, as of this week, it's back. Right now, the site tells visitors that "Obietalk is only accesible to students on campus at the moment. Student email login will be added shortly..." but yesterday, before I spoke with Obietalk founder Will Adams-Keane, anyone could access it.

Adams-Keane, the 22-year-old senior who created Obietalk when he was a freshman, told me he took the site down for a few months so he could rewrite it and include some form of community moderation. Now, students can "report" posts to add them to a moderation queue. "Obietalk will automatically review reported posts and if deemed offensive through a sentiment analysis, then they will be immediately hidden until further review," he wrote in an email. "Otherwise, they will remain visible until I can take a look at them."

Advertisement

As of now, Adams-Keane is the site's only moderator. A banner warns users that offensive comments naming names will be deleted, but when I checked it yesterday, one post said someone was "a gigantic mark of shame on Oberlin as both a school and a community," there was a list of the "Hottest Oberlin virgins" and someone had commented on "some fine ass minorities in the freshman class." There were tons of first and last names up there for everyone to see.

Adams-Keane said he felt bad for students who had been hurt because of his site. "While there are a number of forms of anonymous communication at Oberlin, it seems that Obietalk has been more widely used and I wish that students would have the same respect for their peers on Obietalk as they do in real life," he wrote. "I've always been willing to remove anything if someone asks me to, but I know that even just seeing it once can be damaging enough."

Advertisement

Why did he make it in the first place? To replace Oberlin Confessional — the site that forced Minall to withdraw back in 2007. "I thought it would be cool to make a replacement for it and improve on some things," he said. Cool, indeed.

Dean Estes told me in an email that sites like Obietalk are "often unproductive," and suggested we check out the new Oberlin Compliments Facebook page, which allows students to anonymously compliment others. Estes said the administration had "zero purview" over Obietalk, no more control "than we do over Facebook or any other public networking site. It isn't housed on our server and Obie isn't trademarked." He suggested that concerned students contact Adams-Keane, who "has said all along that he will remove flagged posts or posts students contact him to remove. I know that isn't good, but it is what it is…"

Advertisement

Why is the Dean of Students at a private college advising legitimately fearful undergrads to get in touch with a rather dispassionate 22-year-old?

"It's Oberlin," said Minall, who is now a paralegal in Manhattan, studying for the LSATs. "It's a liberal school. They want to protect the rights of students."

Advertisement

It's understandable that Oberlin would be wary about restricting free speech by, say, blocking Obietalk on campus. But Oberlin students and their families pay $44,905 a year to take classes like "Visible Bodies and the Politics of Sexuality," not to be forced out of school by internet trolls; the administration should work more actively to ban hate speech from the site instead of suggesting students police it themselves. Will Obietalk's new moderation system actually work? Moreover, how long will it take the administration to notice?



Photo via baslow's Flickr.