NPR Temp Workers Are Frustrated With Their Precarious, 'Exploitative' Employment

Image for article titled NPR Temp Workers Are Frustrated With Their Precarious, 'Exploitative' Employment
Image: Getty

Today in unfair and unjust labor practices in the media industry, we look towards NPR, where temporary workers are hired to do the same work as other producers and editors, but regularly have to worry about their assignments ending for no reason, or worse, for a bad reason, like the fact they took a vacation.


The Washington Post spoke to current and former temp workers about the precarious nature of their employment at NPR, and found that several of them described the system as “exploitative.” One temp (most were anonymous) compared her employer to “the boyfriend who’s never going to put a ring on it” in a conversation with union organizers. (Although temp workers have access to health care and a guaranteed minimum wage through SAG-AFTRA, “not much else is assured” to temp workers.)

Union representatives at NPR said that about one in five workers in the newsroom is a temp worker. NPR attempted to downplay its reliance on its temp workers, but simply fluffed that statistic by including employees who aren’t eligible for the union, like managers and interns, in it. Still, according to NPR’s number-crunching, temps still account for a significant percentage of the company—around 16 percent—while a study last year showed radio stations on average have just have one temp worker.

Some of the former temps interviewed for the Post’s story spent years in their position before being hired full-time—but some are never hired and eventually leave, and they’re referred to as “permatemps.” All this, despite the fact temps’ workload often sounds comparable to that of their full-time colleagues. Here’s how the Post described one former temp worker, who worked at “Morning Edition” for three years and held various jobs:

Her responsibilities ran the gamut: editing, research, pitching story ideas, writing segment introductions, mixing recordings, doing interviews.

She applied for jobs when they came open, but never got hired permanently. “At that point, I was really frustrated,” she said. “You ask yourself, why am I still doing this and no one will hire me?”

By its very nature, temporary work assignments allow companies the flexibility not to pay them as much:

In a lengthy response via email, Mayor made no mention of any financial advantage in employing temps. But the potential seems obvious: Temporary employees are paid only when they work, and they work only when managers decide. This gives NPR, a nonprofit organization, flexibility in managing its payroll and broad discretion over work assignments.


But temp workers are still subject to the same working conditions as everyone else, even if those working conditions are potentially terrible. As the Post points out, a “then-temp worker” was among the women who accused NPR’s former head of the newsroom, Michael Oreskes, of misconduct, which led him to eventually step down.

The media industry runs on one well-greased lie: That working for prestige journalism outlets—and increasingly, working for any journalism outlet—is something that journalists within the system should be eternally grateful for, regardless of the pay or working conditions. That is not true, and workers have been realizing that for a long time. NPR may feel some pressure to do better—it offered full-time jobs to 26 temp workers in April—but if the status quo continues, it will surely hear from more of the workers it’s stringing along. It’s only a matter of when.


How About It, Torgo?

Is there any industry where this ISN’T happening? I completed 4 separate contract assignments and spent a total of 3.5 years with the corporate office of a large financial institution. Sure as shit, this company valued what I brought to the table, as they kept asking me back for assignment after assignment; but never sought to hire me on full-time. I always characterized my role there as being “disposable”, but “precarious” as a descriptor seems to be just as effective.

I knew that this practice of relying heavily on contract workers was prevalent in the corporate world (at least where I’m at in the midwest). I’m disheartened to hear that my favorite news source also takes full advantage of the practice.

And yet it seems that my daily LinkedIn feed consists of posts bitching about “we can’t find skilled workers” or “millennial workers aren’t loyal” and crap like that. Infuriating. This is on you, corporate America. This is on you.