Huckabee Hits Daily Show Audience With Crap About Abortion, Slavery

Illustration for article titled Huckabee Hits Daily Show Audience With Crap About Abortion, Slavery

Mike "Huckles" Huckabee made his second appearance on The Daily Show last night, holding Jon Stewart to his promise that he'd allow Huckabee to pick the topic. Huckabee chose abortion; Stewart broke out the booze.


The interview, which lasted nearly twenty minutes, was heavily edited for broadcast, so Stewart encouraged people to watch it in its entirely on the site. It's broken up (relatively poorly) into three segments.

<td style='padding:2px 1px 0px 5px;' colspan='2'Mike Huckabee Extended Interview Pt. 1

In this first segment, Huckabee states that his position on abortion comes down to his respect for human life and his belief that every human life has value. If you're curious, Huckabee — by his own admission — authorized more executions than any other governor in Arkansas' history. When asked to explain his feelings about executions, he said:

I authorized other executions after that one, but it never became easier. If it had, there would have been something wrong with me or the process. To this day I am confident that I did the right thing—"right" defined against moral absolutes in the midst of an imperfect world.

He added that he felt that God, not taxpayers, should judge his actions.

Stewart asked Huckabee if he really believes that pro-choice advocates don't value life. Huckabee agreed that they're not necessarily callous, but that they haven't thought their position through enough.

For example, if we tell the generation coming up after us that it is okay to take a human life because that life represents to us an interference or an interruption to our lives, either economically, or socially, or whatever the reason — and, by the way, 93 percent of abortions are elective abortions. It has nothing to do with the health of the mother, it has nothing to do with the health of the baby, and it's not a matter of rape...


Actually, Huckabee is completely incorrect on that last point — abortions in the case of rape and incest are still generally classified as elective abortions. But, more to the point, Huckabee has also made a great argument against the death penalty, which he supports and acted out.

Huckabee goes on to make the argument that life begins at conception, and that, since a fetus is a cluster of human-DNA- containing cells (and not another species) it is therefore a human life. His final point is that he wouldn't want his children to be able to determine his life in old age based on their convenience.

I do not want to give my kids the opportunity to say, "Dad, you are an interference. Coming to see you in the nursing home is messing up my social life. You are very expensive, Dad. Your long term care bill is breaking us."


Yeah, no shit Huckabee doesn't want his kids determining his fate — at age 18, his son David found a skinny dog with a rash, tortured it and hung it at a Boy Scout camp to "put it out of its misery." Stewart, thankfully, pointed out there's a bit of a difference because Huckabee wouldn't be living inside the bodies of his children.

<td style='padding:2px 1px 0px 5px;' colspan='2'Mike Huckabee Extended Interview Pt. 2


In segment 2, Huckabee and Stewart got into the current debate about abortion reduction. Huckabee went straight to the idea of parental notification — because, as is the anti-abortion movement's biggest canard, if you can prevent access to abortion, you're preventing abortion, full stop. Who cares about preventing unwanted pregnancies, if you can just force women to keep the babies?


Stewart countered with the crazy idea that maybe women don't want the government telling them what they can — and what they should have to — do with their bodies. Huckabee had an answer for that, though.

See, Jon, I don't know of a pro-life person that believes if the mother's physical health is in jeopardy that you just let the mother die in order to save the child. Your ideal would be to save both.


For one thing, in fact, there are plenty of people in the anti-abortion movement who deny the fact that pregnancy carries dangers for the mother or that, when it does, abortion is truly justified — Amanda Marcotte found that out from one of the movement's campus advocacy handbooks not too long ago. For two, the GOP's own Presidential candidate dismissed the idea that abortion could be necessary for the health of the mother in a televised debate less than a year ago with a spectacular application of "dick fingers." So, actually, there are plenty of people in the anti-abortion movement who could give a shit about the health of the mother.


Stewart attempted to bring the discussion back to abortion-reduction strategies other than access-reduction. Huckabee, however, refused to get drawn into a debate about contraception education and started talking about the recent Gallup poll seized on by anti-abortion advocates in order to "prove" that the United States is a pro-life country.


Failing to draw Stewart into that discussion, Huckabee — in his gentle, folksy, not-crazy-sounding way — hit on the final, most absurdist talking point on abortion: he compared women who have abortion to slave holders.

I think one of the fundamental questions that we would have to come to is does a person have a right to own another person. That really is the issue. Can a person own another person? Can a mother totally own the child? Can the father totally own the child?


The abortion-as-slavery comparison isn't new. What is scary about Huckabee, though, is he managed to convey the exact same points as other anti-abortion conservatives without resorting to the kind of scare rhetoric that soothes the base and inflames the rest of us. Instead, he came across sounding thoughtful...if you didn't think too hard about what he was saying. He even quoted the Declaration of Independence in support of his point — if you define a fetus as a human, then, according to Huckabee, fetuses are entitled to the same right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" as the rest of us. Maybe we ought to stop calling it abortion, and start calling it "fetal liberation"?


<td style='padding:2px 1px 0px 5px;' colspan='2'Mike Huckabee Extended Interview Pt. 3


Huckabee continued with his oblique slavery references in the third segment. He said:

The question is, is that life inside the mother a human life? If it is, then that human life has equal value to the 70-year-old man, to the 7-year-old child. There is no point at which human life loses its intrinsic worth and value. Do we have the right to own another person?


What Huckabee was doing is taking part of the reasoning of Roe v. Wade (that as the fetus approaches viability, its rights increase in relation to the mother), throwing in a little science (the fetus has human DNA, therefore it is human), mixing it up with the rhetoric of our forefathers and pouring listeners a strangely vomit-flavored concoction based on the idea that the uteruses of American women are carrying their country's citizens.


Unfortunately, after this, Stewart went off the rails, using language about stem cell research to try to draw Huckabee into a debate about IVF treatment, which Huckabee used to turn into a debate about "snowflake babies" (kids born from frozen embryos designated for destruction) — which is, after all, already on the anti-abortion movement's agenda.


Stewart did, however, finally get back to the idea of abortion-reduction through education, which Huckabee expressed limited support for before returning to the abortion-as slavery analogy.

The problem with Mike Huckabee is that, despite his fundamentalist Christian beliefs and strong social conservative streak, he comes across sounding so damn reasonable. Luckily for us, fiscally conservative Republicans hate him even more than John McCain meaning he probably couldn't be able to could pull something off in 2012.


Related: Mike Huckabee on Crime [OnTheIssues]
Can a Naughty Boy Bring Down a Wannabe President? [Wonkette]

Earlier: Stop The Presses: Abortion Protesters Are Disingenuous?
John McCain Spews Rhetorical Chunks Into The Lap Of America
Has A Pro-Choice President Made More Americans Pro-Life?
Abortion Is The Same As & Cause Of Everything: Obama Edition
When Viability Starts Earlier, When Does The Right To Abortion End?
Nadya Suleman Is The New Poster Girl For Restricting Reproductive Rights


meritxell: an erotic life

I still think in this debate to me all touchy-feely middle groundy about sex education, better child care things, exceptions for the life of the mother, adoption counseling and shit is the fact that anti-choice men and women just think that pregnancy is no big fucking deal for all women. That it doesn't matter if a woman gets pregnant as long as she has options after birth.

Which of course ignores the big fucking point that no woman should have to give birth against her will. It's all sunshine and rainbows to make some token gesture about providing for teh bebehs after you've carried it for 9 months and pushed it out of your ute.

Bodily integrity is one of the most fundamental rights in the law since, like, forever. I'm sure I'm in the minority here, but the whole idea of pregnancy and giving birth is really unappealing to me. No, I don't want my body hijacked. It's violative. I don't care if I have a million dollars and some supportive long term partner that makes it technically feasible to RAISE a child. First you have to give BIRTH to a child. Some women may never ever want that.

Antichoicers are demanding that prochoicers make all these concessions to muddy the waters so that nobody will notice what I think they really, truly believe: that pregnancy will make all women into Madonnas, and that former "Mary Magdalenes" will find the Light and once they drop the bebeh they'll reform and start going to church or something.

It's ridiculous, and this is their motive, and I almost think abortion rights are better defended under establishment of religion rather than privacy because I've never heard an antichoice argument that didn't basically come down to "it's in the Bible" (even if it's apparently really not).