Illustration for article titled Female Soldiers Sue for Their Right to Fight in Combat

Two female soldiers are suing the U.S. military for banning them (and all women) from front-line combat positions, an act which they say violates their right to equal protection under the Fifth Amendment — and affects their salaries, promotion and advancement, and future retirement benefits.


The Pentagon said it would open 14,000 more positions for women in February, but none of those positions are in infantry, armor or special-operations units in which the main job is front-line combat. Given that women make up about 14.5 percent of active-duty military personnel — not that small a portion! — and more than 800 female soldiers have been wounded and more than 130 killed in fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, it seems grossly unfair to tell them what they are and aren't capable of achieving. "The linear battlefield no longer exists," said Command Sergeant Major Jane Baldwin and Colonel Ellen Haring, the Army reservists who filed the suit.

Although the Defense Department's spokesperson wouldn't comment on the lawsuit, the Army's Chief of Staff, General Raymond Odierno, said the Army might make infantry and army positions unisex and " was considering letting women attend its elite Ranger School." Ooh, how big of them! We hope they don't distract the men by prancing around in short skirts and passing notes in class.


It'll be interesting to see how much pressure it takes to convince the Pentagon that women should be given equal responsibility — and therefore benefit from the same honors, financial and otherwise — on the battlefield.

Female soldiers sue to lift combat ban 'solely on the basis of sex' [MSNBC]

Image via Burlingham/Shutterstock.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter


Was navy, my two cents...

This is taking too long already. Had plenty of women in my unit who could kick ass.

Much like DADT, I wonder why this is still even a conversation.