Conservative Dennis Prager Knows It's Not Rape If His Wife "Submits"

Illustration for article titled Conservative Dennis Prager Knows It's Not Rape If His Wife "Submits"

Conservative pundit and marital rape apologist Dennis Prager has some advice for you ladies with faltering marriages: don't think that just because you don't want to have sex your husband shouldn't try to fuck you.


Like Tucker Carlson before him, Prager thinks the key to a successful marriage is just doing it even when you don't want to. In Prager's case, he means "whenever your husband wants," regardless of your "mood," which shouldn't matter. Of course, you could be in that mood because your husband is a liar and a cheat, or because he's just driven your family into debt or hit you (not too hard, of course, but things happen), but as long as he wants to fuck, well, you should suck it up and submit.

According to Prager, women just don't understand that men view your willingness to "submit" to his penetration of your body as the way that you show love.

First, women need to recognize how a man understands a wifes refusal to have sex with him: A husband knows that his wife loves him first and foremost by her willingness to give her body to him. This is rarely the case for women. Few women know their husband loves them because he gives her his body (the idea sounds almost funny). This is, therefore, usually a revelation to a woman. Many women think mens natures are similar to theirs, and this is so different from a womans nature, that few women know this about men unless told about it.

I mean, of course women don't desire sex for the sake of, you know, "pleasure" (and certainly not in Dennis Prager's house), so it's obviously all about love. Deep, deep love, which your husband returns so deeply that he has to stick his dick in you all the time whether you want to or not!

Prager adds that women should just accept that men are filthy dirty pigs about sex even when they love you, and women are not being kind if they refuse to let their husbands penetrate them vaginally anytime their husbands want. I mean, look at all the self-denial husbands engage in by not fucking every other woman in the world!

Compared to most womens sexual nature, mens sexual nature is far closer to that of animals. So what? That is the way he is made. Blame God and nature. Telling your husband to control it is a fine idea. But he already does. Every man who is sexually faithful to his wife already engages in daily heroic self-control. He has married knowing he will have to deny his sexual natures desire for variety for the rest of his life. To ask that he also regularly deny himself sex with the one woman in the world with whom he is permitted sex is asking far too much.


I mean, right ladies? Your husband could be regularly having sex with other women [Ed.: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA] so it's your solemn duty to shut up, lie down and spread them whenever he wants to thank him for that daily, nay, hourly sacrifice of not fucking other people like he promised to do "for richer and for poorer and in sickness and in health." Otherwise, you know...

Deny him enough times and he may try to fill this need with another woman.

Also, by the way, his desire for constant fucking regardless of your needs or desires is, after all, why you didn't marry a pussy.

Most women will readily acknowledge that it is certainly not enough for a man to be kind to her. If it were, women would rarely reject kind men as husband material. But as much as a woman wants a kind man, she wants more than that. If a man is, let us say, lacking in ambition or just doesnt want to work hard, few women will love him no matter how kind he is. In fact, most women would happily give up some kindness for hard work and ambition. A kind man with little ambition is not masculine, therefore not desirable to most women.


See, if your husband is understanding of your sex drive and needs, he's just a pussy and you didn't date a pussy because you wanted some asshole with enough drive to take care of your material needs like all women do, so put out already, Jesus. Quid pro quo, ladies.

I mean, not that it's actually enough to only tell your husband "no" so infrequently that he barely notices. Because, really, even once will mean he's unfulfilled and will fuck around on you anyway.

But, to repeat the key point, rejection of sex should happen infrequently. And it should almost never be dependent on mood...At the same time, men need to recognize that complete sexual fulfillment is unattainable in this world.


So, as long as you never refuse to have sex, happily accommodate his every sexual whim and never think about what you want or need sexually, Dennis Prager will happily inform your husband not to seek actual complete sexual fulfillment because he'll never have that no matter how much you "submit."

Gosh, it must be so much fun to be married to Dennis Prager, what with all the submission and fucking and being told what to do to make him happy even if you can never fulfill him sexually. Guess that's why he's been divorced twice.


When a Woman Isn't in the Mood: Part I [Townhall]

Related: Dennis Prager [Wikipedia]

Earlier: Tucker Carlson's Guide To Not Getting Divorced