@Trixie from Toronto: I agree. Read more
TruculentandUnreliable
truculentandunreliable-old
@J.D.Regent: Exactly. And I think we should actually find her success encouraging. Honestly, I expected much, much worse. She's definitely paved the way for a female president. Read more
@J.D.Regent: Yeah, I don't see how he's any different. He wants to be in Iraq indefinitely, his answers to our economic problems are to cut taxes and stop filling up the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Whoo hoo. Sounds pretty traditionally republican to me. Read more
@J.D.Regent: There are a few issues with the book (for example, saying that the vast majority of drug research is done at universities and other institutions), but it's really good at breaking down how the patent system works and the way that big pharma has basically re-marketed what are basically the same drugs to us… Read more
@J.D.Regent: Have you read this? Read more
I wish I were that badass. Read more
@TruculentandUnreliable: Also, why won't my new avatar fucking upload already? Damn! Read more
@BiscuitDoughJones: I want to see that shit, yo. Read more
Yeah, super uber douchetastic. That is all. Read more
@stoprobbers: Okay, just making sure. It's crazy to me how many people with horrible allergies that I know who just pop a Benadryl and expect it to be better. Read more
@Entonces loves BACON: I completely see your point, and I'm afraid of the Reagan democrats, too. I think that most women who are pissed off about the nomination are still going to vote for Obama in November, even if they have to hold their noses. The Reagan dems, however—who the fuck knows??? Read more
@MattapanTrolley: I know, and I'm sorry that she didn't get the thanks/recognition that she deserved. My point is that her not getting recognition is definitely NOT more dangerous to pro-choice causes than having an anti-choice president who would appoint anti-choice judges. Read more
@BowlingForDollars: Yeah, plus, it was "country" talk, not "trailer park" talk. :) Read more
@myrtlebeachbum: It must be a Kansas thing. In the mid-90s Always pissed me off. Read more
@NOLAgirl: Exactly. I don't expect either Clinton or Obama to come out and say, "See those retards who keep saying sexist/racist shit? They're retards." I mean, it would be great if they did, but I don't think they're bad people for not doing it. They're not the ones who are spewing that shit. Why should they… Read more
@MattapanTrolley: You seriously think that? I don't think that Clinton worked for choice to get an endorsement from NARAL. I mean, this probably kind of stings, but that's not why she does what she does, and I doubt that not getting recognized for her contributions is going to keep her from fighting for choice. I… Read more
@myrtlebeachbum: Thuh dogs were all barkin and I said "Katie*, watchu barkin about" and then I looked up and there was a tornada comin down!" Read more
@SarahMC: That makes sense, and I was trying to find out when NARAL normally endorses candidates; in other words, is it common for them to endorse the presumptive democratic nominee even before the whole show is over? I couldn't find anything out about that. I agree that it wasn't well-timed, but I don't think it… Read more
@GoodMorningAngels: See, I'm totally confused by this, and I'm not being confrontational here, because I'd really just like to understand. I see why Clinton supporters feel betrayed by NARAL, and really, it would've been nice if they had declared their support for one candidate or another earlier. However, they… Read more